<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Keulenae's Favorite Links on nuclear from Diigo</title>
    <link>http://www.diigo.com/user/Keulenae/nuclear</link>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:34:16 -0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:34:16 -0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Is nuclear power essential to addressing climate change and energy independence? - NewTalk</title>
      <link>http://newtalk.org/2008/07/is-nuclear-power-essential-to.php</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Calling climate change one of the greatest challenges ever faced by the human race, some former opponents of nuclear power have recently become its advocates, if cautious advocates. Our purpose here is not to debate climate change, but rather &amp;quot;Is nuclear power essential to addressing climate change and energy independence?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/debate' rel='tag'&gt;debate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/carbon' rel='tag'&gt;carbon&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/climate' rel='tag'&gt;climate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:34:16 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>jimharding382007.pdf (application/pdf Object)</title>
      <link>http://www.nirs.org/nukerelapse/neconomics/jimharding382007.pdf</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/myths' rel='tag'&gt;myths&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:43:19 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Environmental Capital - WSJ.com : Nuclear Option: It's Not Verboten Anymore</title>
      <link>http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2008/06/17/nuclear-option-its-not-verboten-anymore</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;A lot of politicians seem to love nuclear power—from John McCain to Angela Merkel and Silvio Berlusconi. But more importantly, public opinion everywhere is getting behind them.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/Germany' rel='tag'&gt;Germany&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/policy' rel='tag'&gt;policy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/wsj.com' rel='tag'&gt;wsj.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:48:22 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Will nuclear-produced electricity be low carbon? - AutoblogGreen</title>
      <link>http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/05/19/will-nuclear-produced-electricity-be-low-carbon</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;Nuclear energy is often touted by its supporters as being cheap, clean and plentiful. It's often stated in articles on the subject that Patrick Moore, &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.archive.org/web/20060514012451/http://www.greenpeace.org/international/about/history/founders&quot;&gt;purported&lt;/a&gt; co-founder of Greenpeace, &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.archive.org/web/20060207170119/http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060113/BUSINESS11/601130327/1071&quot;&gt;is in favor of increased nuclear plants&lt;/a&gt;. In fact, there are about 30 new American nuclear plants currently on the drawing board. So, does nuclear live up to the claims of its supporters? Well, for one, it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sptimes.com/2007/12/12/news_pf/State/Nuclear_power_costs_s.shtml&quot;&gt;might not be as cheap&lt;/a&gt; as we've been told. Two reactors planned for Levy County, Florida may clock in at more than twice their original estimate at $10 billion. You can install a lot of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/04/01/video-huge-solar-project-to-begin-this-year/&quot;&gt;distributed solar capacity for that kind of money&lt;/a&gt;. In fact Moody's Investor Services gave an estimate in October of $6,000 per kilowatt that Jim Hempstead (a senior credit officer at Moody's) stated in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121055252677483933.html?mod=googlenews_wsj&quot;&gt;recent article in the Wall Street Journal&lt;/a&gt; has been &quot;blown by&quot; after reviewing recent estimates from a handful of &quot;experienced different nuclear operators&quot;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/economics' rel='tag'&gt;economics&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/ev' rel='tag'&gt;ev&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/transport' rel='tag'&gt;transport&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 08:07:48 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Technology Review: Invest In Green France</title>
      <link>http://www.technologyreview.com/france</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/france' rel='tag'&gt;france&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/green' rel='tag'&gt;green&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/fuel.cell' rel='tag'&gt;fuel.cell&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/wind' rel='tag'&gt;wind&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:05:04 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nanomaterial turns radiation directly into electricity - energy-fuels - 27 March 2008 - New Scientist Environment</title>
      <link>http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/energy-fuels/dn13545-nanomaterial-turns-radiation-directly-into-electricity.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Electricity is usually made using nuclear power by heating steam to rotate turbines that generate electricity.&lt;/p&gt;
        
    
    

    
    
        
            &lt;p&gt;But beginning in the 1960s, the US and Soviet Union used &lt;a href=&quot;http://technology.newscientist.com/channel/tech/dn13512-reincarnated-material-turns-waste-heat-into-power.html&quot;&gt;thermoelectric materials that convert heat into electricity&lt;/a&gt; to power spacecraft using nuclear fission or decaying radioactive material. The Pioneer missions were among those using the latter, &quot;nuclear battery&quot; approach.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/electricity' rel='tag'&gt;electricity&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/heat' rel='tag'&gt;heat&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/technology' rel='tag'&gt;technology&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:30:47 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Oil Drum: Europe | Why wind needs feed-in tariffs (and why it is not the enemy of nuclear)</title>
      <link>http://europe.theoildrum.com/node/3688</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;An argument often heard against wind is that it costs a lot in public subsidies for a solution that will always have a limited 

impact (because it still produces only a small fraction of overall needs, and because of its unreliability linked to its 

intermitten nature). This is an argument worth addressing in detail, especially when it is pointed out, as the graph shows, that 

wind is already almost competitive with the other main sources of electricity, which suggests that it might not even &lt;i&gt;need&lt;/i&gt; 

the subsidies then (and the increase in commodity prices since that graph was prepared using 2004 data, only reinforces that 

argument).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/costs' rel='tag'&gt;costs&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/europe' rel='tag'&gt;europe&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/feedin' rel='tag'&gt;feedin&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/tariffs' rel='tag'&gt;tariffs&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 08:38:15 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IEEE Spectrum: Does Fusion Have a Future?</title>
      <link>http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/feb08/5980</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;U.S. funding reversal for ITER suggests that fusion
            energy—&quot;always just a few decades away from reality&quot; as the
            joke goes—may have finally run out of decades&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/fusion' rel='tag'&gt;fusion&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/spectrum' rel='tag'&gt;spectrum&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:29:15 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Endesa world's top sustainable electricity company | EnerPub - Energy Publisher</title>
      <link>http://www.energypublisher.com/article.asp?idcategory=33&amp;idSub=128&amp;idArticle=14508</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;PricewaterhouseCoopers and the SAM Group chose Endesa as the most sustainable electricity company in their Sustainability Yearbook, based on the company's economic, environmental and social responsibility. Endesa scored 78%, compared to an average for the sector of 60%.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/csr' rel='tag'&gt;csr&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/electricity' rel='tag'&gt;electricity&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/endesa' rel='tag'&gt;endesa&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:27:57 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Iran's nuclear programme | As the enrichment machines spin on | Economist.com</title>
      <link>http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displayStory.cfm?story_id=10601584&amp;subjectID=821240&amp;fsrc=nwl</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;IF YOU are locked eyeball to eyeball with an adversary as wily as Iran, it does not make much sense to do something that emboldens your opponent and sows defeatism among your friends. But that, it is now clear, is precisely what America's spies achieved when they said in December that, contrary to their own previous assessments, Iran stopped its secret nuclear-weapons programme in 2003.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/economist.com' rel='tag'&gt;economist.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/iran' rel='tag'&gt;iran&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:05:42 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ecological Economics: Exclusively Renewable Energy by 2050: Germany Says Yes!</title>
      <link>http://forestpolicy.typepad.com/ecoecon/2008/01/exclusively-ren.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Comments:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;The problem is at least recognised, instead of declaring it a myth. But the video remains a concept. The numbers are not worked out, nor the economics. And while variability can be reduced by combining different renewables, nobody knows whether we will get it right 95, 99 or the current 99.9% of the time. 30 minutes of outage per year does not leave much margin for error. &lt;small&gt;posted by &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;Germany is looking to integrate wind, solar, and biofuel natural gas to supply 100% of its power generation needs by 2050 (40% by 2020).  Germany plans to phase out both Nuclear and Coal-fired power generation.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/2050' rel='tag'&gt;2050&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/ecological' rel='tag'&gt;ecological&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/economics' rel='tag'&gt;economics&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/germany' rel='tag'&gt;germany&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/intermittency' rel='tag'&gt;intermittency&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:50:17 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Quotations</title>
      <link>http://leonardo-web.org/quotations</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/action' rel='tag'&gt;action&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/energy' rel='tag'&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/energy+efficiency' rel='tag'&gt;energy efficiency&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/leadership' rel='tag'&gt;leadership&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:44:31 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Oil Drum: Europe | New Nuclear Reactors For The UK: Is This Really A Good Idea?</title>
      <link>http://europe.theoildrum.com/node/3450</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is a guest article by Dr. David Fleming. Fleming is the Founder Director of the Lean Economy Connection, and an independent writer in the fields of energy, environment, economics, society and culture. The article is based on Fleming’s recent 56-page booklet, The Lean Guide to Nuclear Energy, which expands and references the arguments presented. The booklet is available to download here: The Lean Guide to Nuclear Energy&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:00:28 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Britain Could Get 60% of its Electricity until 2060 from... Nuclear Waste : TreeHugger</title>
      <link>http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/12/britain_nuclear_waste.php</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&quot;We can bury our reactor waste or we can treat it and then use it as free fuel for life. It's a no-brainer.&quot; - Sir David King, Chief Science Adviser&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/reprocessing' rel='tag'&gt;reprocessing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/waste' rel='tag'&gt;waste&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/United' rel='tag'&gt;United&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/Kingdom' rel='tag'&gt;Kingdom&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 08:09:41 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cravens - Home</title>
      <link>http://cravenspowertosavetheworld.com</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;In this timely book, Gwyneth Cravens takes an informed and clarifying look at the myths, the fears, and the truth about nuclear energy.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/global+warming' rel='tag'&gt;global warming&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 02:13:30 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The world of energy in 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.leonardo-energy.org/drupal/node/2478</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Highlights of the energy year 2007&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/batteries' rel='tag'&gt;batteries&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/carbon' rel='tag'&gt;carbon&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/climate' rel='tag'&gt;climate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/energy+efficiency' rel='tag'&gt;energy efficiency&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/greenwash' rel='tag'&gt;greenwash&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:03:43 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nuclear Power Worldwide: Status and Outlook</title>
      <link>http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/PressReleases/2007/prn200719.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;The IAEA makes two annual projections concerning the growth of nuclear power, a low and a high. The low projection assumes that all nuclear capacity that is currently under construction or firmly in the development pipeline gets completed and attached to the grid, but no other capacity is added. In this low projection, there would be growth in capacity from 370 GW(e) at the end of 2006 to 447 GW(e) in 2030. (A gigawatt = 1000 megawatts = 1 billion watts).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the IAEA´s high projection - which adds in additional reasonable and promising projects and plans - global nuclear capacity is estimated to rise to 679 GW(e) in 2030. That would be an average growth rate of about 2.5%/yr.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/electricity' rel='tag'&gt;electricity&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/future' rel='tag'&gt;future&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/roadmap' rel='tag'&gt;roadmap&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 03:47:21 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Oil Drum: Europe | Energy: the fundamental unseriousness of Gordon Brown</title>
      <link>http://europe.theoildrum.com/node/3126</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Guardian &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/oct/23/renewableenergy.energy&quot;&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt; this morning on a private report to Gordon Brown that suggests that Britain should oppose binding target for renewable energies in Europe (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.euractiv.com/en/energy/eu-renewable-energy-policy/article-117536&quot;&gt;20% of all energy by 2020&lt;/a&gt;, as agreed earlier this year at this spring's EU Summit). The Guardian flags the juicy political bits (&quot;&lt;i&gt;work with Poland and other governments &lt;b&gt;sceptical about climate change&lt;/b&gt; to &quot;help persuade&quot; German chancellor Angela Merkel and others to set lower renewable targets&lt;/i&gt;&quot;, &quot;&lt;i&gt;a potentially significant cost in terms of reduced climate change leadership&lt;/i&gt;&quot;), but also provides some of the apparent underlying reasons provided, which are worth commenting upon:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt; it undermines the carbon-trading scheme which &quot;&lt;i&gt;allows wealthy governments to pay others to reduce emissions&lt;/i&gt;&quot;;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt; it costs too much money (£4 billion a year to get to 9% by 2020);&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt; it does not help push for new nuclear plants as it &quot;&lt;i&gt;reduces the incentives to invest in other carbon technologies like nuclear power&lt;/i&gt;&quot;;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let's say it plainly: each of these arguments is stupid, short-sighted and, quite simply, false. Let me take you through them in turn (under the fold).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/costs' rel='tag'&gt;costs&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/policy' rel='tag'&gt;policy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/renewable.energy' rel='tag'&gt;renewable.energy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/United' rel='tag'&gt;United&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:48:22 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUROPA - Rapid - Press Releases</title>
      <link>http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/07/1370&amp;format=HTML&amp;aged=0&amp;language=EN&amp;guiLanguage=en</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/europe' rel='tag'&gt;europe&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/technology.platform' rel='tag'&gt;technology.platform&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:25:10 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Energy Outlook</title>
      <link>http://energyoutlook.blogspot.com/2007/09/nuclear-freakonomics.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;Any answers to these questions would be purely speculative, but if the industry had continued expanding at its previous rate, then instead of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mer/pdf/pages/sec8_3.pdf&quot;&gt;current 104 reactors&lt;/a&gt;, we might easily have 200, contributing 40% of our total electricity supplies. Coal-fired power plants would supply only 32% of our power needs, instead of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epat1p1.html&quot;&gt;50%&lt;/a&gt;, and we'd emit roughly 650 million tons less CO2 per year.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/climate' rel='tag'&gt;climate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/future' rel='tag'&gt;future&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/kyoto' rel='tag'&gt;kyoto&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/nuclear' rel='tag'&gt;nuclear&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae/scenario' rel='tag'&gt;scenario&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/keulenae'&gt;keulenae&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:50:22 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
  </channel>
</rss>