<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Fre_entity's Favorite Links on study from Diigo</title>
    <link>http://www.diigo.com/user/Fre_entity/study</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:34:45 -0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:34:45 -0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Untitled Document</title>
      <link>http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/52/breadcrumb.htm</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;n our last issue of Usability News, we reported on the general usage of breadcrumb trails as a method of navigation on web sites (Lida, Hull &amp;amp; Pilcher, 2003). The term “breadcrumb” derives its name from the Grimm’s fairy tale, Hansel and Gretel. Hansel left a trail of breadcrumbs through the woods as a strategy to find his way back home. Since today’s internet user often has a need to navigate back through a website path, the cyber-version “breadcrumb trail” was named1.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/usability' rel='tag'&gt;usability&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/user+interface' rel='tag'&gt;user interface&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/breadcrumbs' rel='tag'&gt;breadcrumbs&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/navigation' rel='tag'&gt;navigation&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/study' rel='tag'&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity'&gt;fre_entity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:34:45 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Eye Movement Patterns on Single and Dual-Column Web Pages</title>
      <link>http://www.surl.org/usabilitynews/101/column.asp</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This study examines eye movement patterns of users browsing or searching a 1-column and 2-column news article on a web page. The results show a higher number of fixations for information in the second column of an article than for the same information in the lower portion of a single column. In addition, the typical &amp;quot;F&amp;quot; pattern appeared in the left column of the 2-column layout, but not in the right column. Users also fixated more on other page elements, such as ads, when they were browsing than when they were searching.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/usability' rel='tag'&gt;usability&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/eye-tracking' rel='tag'&gt;eye-tracking&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/study' rel='tag'&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/columns' rel='tag'&gt;columns&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/column' rel='tag'&gt;column&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity'&gt;fre_entity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:54:19 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Four Bad Web Designs (Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox)</title>
      <link>http://www.useit.com/alertbox/bad-design.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Bad content, bad links, bad navigation, bad category pages... which is worst for business? In these examples, bad content takes the prize for costing the company the most money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;Bad content, bad links, bad navigation, bad category pages... which is worst for business? In these examples, bad content takes the prize for costing the company the most money.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;The problem is that every &lt;strong&gt;extra design element detracts&lt;/strong&gt; from all the other design elements on the page. When you push irrelevant links at people, you teach them to ignore the ones that matter.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;The &lt;cite&gt;New York Times&lt;/cite&gt; is probably losing the least money; most users will simply skip the no-scent link. At the same time, of course, the generic link has an opportunity cost: in its place, the newspaper could offer a link to content that's closely related to the current article. People who actually read to the end of the page would be quite likely to click the link. The site could thus gain maybe 2–5% more pageviews through better use of that space.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;My bet for biggest business loss is the content-poor jazz page. Our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nngroup.com/reports/ecommerce/productpages.html&quot; class=&quot;new&quot; title=&quot;Nielsen Norman Group report: E-Commerce User Experience Guidelines for Product Page Usability&quot; linkindex=&quot;11&quot;&gt;user testing of product pages&lt;/a&gt; shows that people are much more likely to buy when a page answers their questions about its offerings.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;My guess is that, by adding more information, the site could &lt;strong&gt;sell at least 5 times as many tickets&lt;/strong&gt; to non-fans. In studying the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/roi.html&quot; class=&quot;old&quot; title=&quot;Alertbox: Usability Return-on-Investment Declining, But Still Strong &quot; linkindex=&quot;12&quot; set=&quot;yes&quot;&gt;ROI of usability improvements&lt;/a&gt;, we sometimes find a sales increase of 1,000% or more. So, adding meaningful content might even make this page a tenbagger for non-fanatical customers.  How much the overall sales would increase depends on the ratio between the rabid adherents of this artist and the people who simply like some jazz from time to time. My guess is that the second group is so much larger that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/papers/webwriting/&quot; class=&quot;old&quot; title=&quot;kob Nielsen: Writing for the Web&quot; linkindex=&quot;13&quot;&gt;better content&lt;/a&gt; would make sales explode.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/jakob+nielsen' rel='tag'&gt;jakob nielsen&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/best+practice' rel='tag'&gt;best practice&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/usability' rel='tag'&gt;usability&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/study' rel='tag'&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/content' rel='tag'&gt;content&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity'&gt;fre_entity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:17:24 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Right-Justified Navigation Menus Impede Scannability (Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox)</title>
      <link>http://www.useit.com/alertbox/navigation-menu-alignment.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Users scan lists by moving their eyes rapidly down the left edge. Menu items that are right-aligned make scanning more difficult.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The &lt;strong&gt;menu design guidelines&lt;/strong&gt; are thus clear, at least for vertical menus:
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Left-justify&lt;/strong&gt; the menu, so that the user's eyes can move in a straight line and don't have to re-acquire the beginning of each new line.
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Start each menu item&lt;/strong&gt; with the one or two most information-carrying words.
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Avoid using the same few words to start list items&lt;/strong&gt;, because doing so makes them harder to scan.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;Aligning a navigation menu with the right margin might look cool, but the resulting &lt;strong&gt;ragged left margin severely reduces the speed&lt;/strong&gt; with which users can scan the menu and select their preferred options.
&lt;p&gt;
(Of course, the left-alignment guideline is for languages that read left-to-right. For &lt;strong&gt;languages that read in the opposite direction&lt;/strong&gt;, the guideline is reversed: you should right-justify the menu. In either case, the point is to make it easier for users to scan down the side on which they start reading.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;To complicate matters, two of these screenshots also violate the &lt;strong&gt;guideline against USING ALL CAPS&lt;/strong&gt;, which reduces legibility by about 10%. When you &lt;strong&gt;mix cases&lt;/strong&gt;, the ascenders and decenders produce varied letterforms, while all caps produce boxy shapes. Users recognize words faster when you preserve traditional word shapes. (As an example, compare the word &quot;Employment&quot; in the left-hand menu with the word &quot;EMPLOYMENT&quot; in the middle menu.)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/best+practice' rel='tag'&gt;best practice&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/usability' rel='tag'&gt;usability&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/reading' rel='tag'&gt;reading&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/study' rel='tag'&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/menu' rel='tag'&gt;menu&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity'&gt;fre_entity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:12:48 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Little Do Users Read? (Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox)</title>
      <link>http://www.useit.com/alertbox/percent-text-read.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We've known since our first studies of how users read on the Web that they typically don't read very much. Scanning text is an extremely common behavior for higher-literacy users; our recent eyetracking studies further validate this finding.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The only thing we've been missing is a mathematical formula to quantify exactly how much (or how little) people read online. Now, thanks to new data, we have this as well. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;Obviously, users tend to spend more time on pages with more information. However, the best-fit formula tells us that they spend only &lt;strong&gt;4.4 seconds more for each additional 100 words&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;The formula in the chart above indicates that there is a fixed time of about 25 seconds, plus an additional 4.4 seconds per 100 words. (Of course, the numbers are not &quot;fixed&quot; in the sense that they're always the same — these are averages.)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;
This is a very rapidly declining curve. On an average visit, &lt;strong&gt;users read half the information&lt;/strong&gt; only on those pages with &lt;strong&gt;111 words or less&lt;/strong&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
In the full dataset, the average page view contained &lt;strong&gt;593 words&lt;/strong&gt;. So, on average, users will have &lt;strong&gt;time to read 28%&lt;/strong&gt; of the words &lt;em&gt;if&lt;/em&gt; they devote all of their time to reading. More realistically, users will &lt;strong&gt;read about 20% of the text&lt;/strong&gt; on the average page.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/jakob+nielsen' rel='tag'&gt;jakob nielsen&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/usability' rel='tag'&gt;usability&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/eyetracking' rel='tag'&gt;eyetracking&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/study' rel='tag'&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/time' rel='tag'&gt;time&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity'&gt;fre_entity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 01:10:41 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Department for Children, Schools and Families : Byron Review</title>
      <link>http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/byronreview</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; On 6th September 2007, the Prime Minister asked me to conduct an independent review looking at the risks to children from exposure to potentially harmful or inappropriate material on the internet and in video games.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My Review is about the needs of children and young people. It is about preserving their right to take the risks that form an inherent part of their development by enabling them to play video games and surf the net in a safe and informed way.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By listening to children and young people and putting them at the heart of this Review - and by replacing emotion with evidence - I hope I have provided some very necessary focus to what is a very necessary debate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PDF versions of the Full Report, Annexes and supporting documentation are available below.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/technology' rel='tag'&gt;technology&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/children' rel='tag'&gt;children&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/safety' rel='tag'&gt;safety&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/study' rel='tag'&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity'&gt;fre_entity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:49:10 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Study: There is No Tipping Point, Blog Readers Are Skeptical - ReadWriteWeb</title>
      <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/study_there_is_no_tipping_poin.php</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A new study by Canadian research firm Pollara has surfaced data indicating that Malcolm Gladwell's popular theory about key influencers moving markets may not be valid. Gladwell's arguments in the 2000 book The Tipping Point had reached levels of cliche approaching The Wisdom of Crowds, in large part because of its seductiveness to marketers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/blog' rel='tag'&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/e-marketing' rel='tag'&gt;e-marketing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/influence' rel='tag'&gt;influence&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/skeptical' rel='tag'&gt;skeptical&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/study' rel='tag'&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity'&gt;fre_entity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:32:55 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Apple iPhone: Successes and Challenges for the Mobile Industry</title>
      <link>http://rubiconconsulting.com/downloads/whitepapers/Rubicon-iPhone_User_Survey.pdf</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Apple iPhone is easily the most publicized new mobile device in recent memory.&lt;br /&gt;But despite all the discussion about the product, there's relatively little hard&lt;br /&gt;information available to the public on its impact. How is it being used? What effect is&lt;br /&gt;it having on customers and on the technology industry?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/iphone' rel='tag'&gt;iphone&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/mobile+web' rel='tag'&gt;mobile web&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/research' rel='tag'&gt;research&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/study' rel='tag'&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity/usage' rel='tag'&gt;usage&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/fre_entity'&gt;fre_entity&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:15:55 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
  </channel>
</rss>