<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Eyalnow's Favorite Links on blog-writing from Diigo</title>
    <link>http://www.diigo.com/user/Eyalnow/blog-writing</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 15:44:24 -0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 15:44:24 -0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Passive Voice Is Redeemed For Web Headings (Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox)</title>
      <link>http://www.useit.com/alertbox/passive-voice.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;Words are usually the main moneymakers on a website. &lt;strong&gt;Selecting the first 2 words&lt;/strong&gt; for your page titles is probably the &lt;strong&gt;highest-impact ROI-boosting design decision&lt;/strong&gt; you make in a Web project. Front-loading important keywords trumps most other design considerations.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;Avoid repeating &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; headline words in the summary, except for the most important one or two keywords. You can repeat these halfway through the summary to reinforce them for people who scanned past them in the headline.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Given that users often read only a couple of words from each text element, you should &lt;strong&gt;reduce duplication of salient keywords&lt;/strong&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Don't use the same initial keywords in your headline and summary. You have 4 words to make your point, so use 4 &lt;em&gt;different&lt;/em&gt; words.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;Users &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html&quot; class=&quot;old&quot; title=&quot;Alertbox: F-Shaped Pattern For Reading Web Content&quot;&gt;scan Web content in an F-pattern&lt;/a&gt;, and often &lt;strong&gt;read only the first 2 words&lt;/strong&gt; of a paragraph. What are the first two words of my draft deck? &quot;Yahoo Finance&quot; — which has zero &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030630.html&quot; class=&quot;old&quot; title=&quot;Alertbox: Information Foraging - Why Google Makes People Leave Your Site Faster&quot;&gt;information scent&lt;/a&gt; for article's target audience.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;Usability increases when users need fewer mental transformations to convert a sentence into actionable understanding.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;When structuring a sentence, &lt;strong&gt;active voice&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;(&quot;Actor does X to Object&quot;)&lt;/em&gt; is usually better than &lt;strong&gt;passive voice&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt; (&quot;Object has X done to it by Actor&quot;)&lt;/em&gt; because it more directly represents the action. As a result, readers don't have to jump through as many cognitive hoops when trying to understand what's going on.
&lt;p&gt;
For the same reason, it's usually better to write a &lt;strong&gt;positive statement&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt; (&quot;do X&quot;)&lt;/em&gt; than a &lt;strong&gt;negative statement&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt; (&quot;avoid Y&quot;)&lt;/em&gt;, and it's almost always horrible to use &lt;strong&gt;double negatives&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt; (&quot;avoid not doing X&quot;&lt;/em&gt;). Again, the simpler the translation between the text and the user's mental model, the easier the writing is to understand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary:&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Active voice is best for most Web content, but using passive voice can let you front-load important keywords in headings, blurbs, and lead sentences. This enhances scannability and thus SEO effectiveness.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/blog-writing' rel='tag'&gt;blog-writing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/grammar' rel='tag'&gt;grammar&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/seo' rel='tag'&gt;seo&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/usability' rel='tag'&gt;usability&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/web-writing' rel='tag'&gt;web-writing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow'&gt;eyalnow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 15:44:24 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Writing Inverted Pyramids in Cyberspace (Alertbox)</title>
      <link>http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9606.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;On the Web, the inverted pyramid becomes even more important since we know
from several user studies that &lt;em&gt;users don't scroll&lt;/em&gt;,(*) so they will very
frequently be left to read only the top part of an article.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;Journalists have long adhered to the inverse approach: start the article by
telling the reader the conclusion (&quot;After long debate, the Assembly voted to
increase state taxes by 10 percent&quot;), follow by the most important supporting
information, and end by giving the background. This style is known as the
&lt;em&gt;inverted pyramid&lt;/em&gt; for the simple reason that it turns the traditional
pyramid style around. Inverted-pyramid writing is useful for newspapers
because readers can stop at any time and will still get the most important
parts of the article.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/blog-writing' rel='tag'&gt;blog-writing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/usability' rel='tag'&gt;usability&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/web-writing' rel='tag'&gt;web-writing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/writing' rel='tag'&gt;writing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow'&gt;eyalnow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 08:50:56 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Writing for the Web (Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox)</title>
      <link>http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9703b.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;Each hypertext page should be written according to the
&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;9606.html&quot; title=&quot;Alertbox June 1996: writing inverse pyramids in cyberspace&quot;&gt;inverse pyramid&lt;/a&gt;&quot; principle and start with a short conclusion so that users can get the gist of the page even if they don't read all of it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;split the information into coherent chunks that each &lt;strong&gt;focus on a certain topic&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;h2&gt;Hypertext Structure&lt;/h2&gt;
Make text short without sacrificing depth of content by splitting the information up into multiple nodes connected by hypertext links. Each page can be brief and yet the full hyperspace can contain much more information than would be feasible in a printed article. Long and detailed background information can be relegated to secondary pages; similarly, information of interest to a minority of readers can be made available through a link without penalizing those readers who don't want it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/blog-writing' rel='tag'&gt;blog-writing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/usability' rel='tag'&gt;usability&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/web-writing' rel='tag'&gt;web-writing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow'&gt;eyalnow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 08:33:43 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 Ways to Eliminate the Echo Chamber ~ Chris Pirillo</title>
      <link>http://chris.pirillo.com/2006/08/18/10-ways-to-eliminate-the-echo-chamber</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;how to be original and creative in blogging&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;When you force yourself to do something that you don’t understand, the results might be messy - but they’ll be genuine.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/advice' rel='tag'&gt;advice&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/blog-writing' rel='tag'&gt;blog-writing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/blogging' rel='tag'&gt;blogging&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/blogosphere' rel='tag'&gt;blogosphere&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/critical-thinking' rel='tag'&gt;critical-thinking&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow'&gt;eyalnow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:57:28 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coding Horror: Thirteen Blog Clichés</title>
      <link>http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000834.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Highlights and Sticky Notes:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;Besides, It's an open secret in the blogging community that &lt;b&gt;the comments are often better than the original blog entry itself&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;The sum total of community contributions is far more useful than any one thing you'll ever write.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;No Comments Allowed&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000538.html&quot;&gt;A blog without comments is not a blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Top (n) Lists&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
    Yes, exactly like this one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
        The problem with Top (n) Lists is that they become &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000578.html&quot;&gt;
            a substitute for critical thinking&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;If all you can find to talk about is what's already popular, you're not trying hard enough. Form your own opinion. Do your own research. Go out of your way to blaze a new trail and create something we haven't already seen hundreds of times before.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;if everyone else is talking about it, that means you should
        &lt;em&gt;avoid&lt;/em&gt; talking about it. Switch things up. Seek out uncommon sites with
        unique information. Dig down to original sources&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Blogging About Blogging&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I find meta-blogging -- blogging about blogging -- &lt;i&gt;incredibly&lt;/i&gt; boring.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sorry I Haven't Written in a While&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If you haven't posted anything new to your blog in a while, don't waste our time with apologies. Just write! The best apology is new and improved content. Maybe with a wee bit more consistency this time, though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's &lt;a href=&quot;http://software.ericsink.com/entries/Goodbye_Sadie.html&quot;&gt;OK to be yourself&lt;/a&gt;; at some level, it is a cult of personality: people are reading not only because your content
    is useful to them, but because they like you. It's normal to inject a regular dose of yourself into the conversation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
        But like Tabasco sauce and other powerful seasonings, a little YOU goes a long way. A &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; long way.  Write accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;This Ain't Your Diary&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;It is almost &lt;i&gt;never&lt;/i&gt; in the reader's interest to see advertisements, so my advice is to tread very lightly, and be respectful of your audience. Bad advertising is so prevalent that if you take the time to advertise responsibly, you may find that readers appreciate you for it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;The reality is that tag cloud visualizations are chaotic, noisy,
        and unusable. Keep the tagging, lose the cloud. A simple sorted list of tags, along
        with the number of posts associated with each tag, is much more effective.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;Citing your references and influences is a great and necessary thing, but obsessively
    listing every single blog you read-- the so-called &quot;blogroll&quot;-- &amp;nbsp;is just noise.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;And do your readers really want to see pictures of the last 10 visitors to your
        blog?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;
        Blogs work because they're simple. When we &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000587.html&quot;&gt;
            clutter up our blogs&lt;/a&gt; with a zillion widgets,
        features, and add-ons, we're destroying an essential part of what makes blogs worthwhile.&lt;/p&gt;
    &lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/images/bookmark-at-these-sites-cropped.png&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;59&quot; alt=&quot;Bookmark at these sites&quot; width=&quot;473&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;No Information on the Author&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;As the old adage goes, &lt;i&gt;a picture is worth a thousand words&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;strong&gt;But y&lt;b&gt;ou
    should no more insert a random image into your writing than you would insert a thousand
    random words into your writing.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; I don't care how beautiful your photographs are, it's a terrible, irresponsible practice that distracts and harms readability.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Random Images Arbitrarily Inserted In Text&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
One of the cardinal rules of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/papers/webwriting/&quot;&gt;web writing&lt;/a&gt; is to &lt;b&gt;avoid large blocks of text&lt;/b&gt;. There are plenty of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9703b.html&quot;&gt;excellent web writing guides&lt;/a&gt; that exhort you to break up your text, using bullets, numbered lists, quotes, paragraph breaks, images-- anything, &lt;i&gt;anything&lt;/i&gt; to avoid creating an intimidating wall of dense, impenetrable text.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;The Useless Calendar Widget&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tags:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/advise' rel='tag'&gt;advise&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/blog-writing' rel='tag'&gt;blog-writing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/blogging' rel='tag'&gt;blogging&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow/writing' rel='tag'&gt;writing&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Posted by:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/eyalnow'&gt;eyalnow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 05:03:38 -0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
  </channel>
</rss>