http://www.diigo.com/user/Cwwgroup/decisions Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:16:59 -0000 Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:16:59 -0000 http://www.wind-watch.org/news/2008/01/11/jefferson-township-wind-issue-moves-to-supreme-court <p></p><p><strong>Highlights and Sticky Notes:</strong><p><div class="content"><a href="http://www.wind-watch.org/news/2008/01/11/jefferson-township-wind-issue-moves-to-supreme-court/" title="Jefferson Township wind issue moves to Supreme Court" style="BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none">Jefferson Township wind issue moves to Supreme Court</a></div></p><p><p><strong>Tags:</strong> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/actions' rel='tag'>actions</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/cases' rel='tag'>cases</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/court' rel='tag'>court</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/decisions' rel='tag'>decisions</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/industrial' rel='tag'>industrial</a> </p><p><strong>Posted by:</strong> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup'>cwwgroup</a></p> Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:16:59 -0000 http://www.wind-watch.org/news/2008/01/09/state-court-to-hear-greenbrier-wind-power-case <p></p><p><strong>Comments:</strong><ul><li><p>State Supreme Court justices this morning will hear arguments over a proposal to build 124 giant wind-power turbines along 23 miles of Greenbrier County ridges.</p> <p>Local opponents of the Beech Ridge Energy LLC project are appealing the state Public Service Commission’s decision to approve the $300 million development.</p> <p>Mountain Communities for Responsible Energy argues that the PSC ignored its own permit regulations and did not obtain adequate information about the wind project’s potential impacts before approving it.</p> <small>posted by <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup'>cwwgroup</a></small></li></ul></p><p><strong>Highlights and Sticky Notes:</strong><p><div class="content"><a href="http://www.wind-watch.org/news/2008/01/09/state-court-to-hear-greenbrier-wind-power-case/" title="State court to hear Greenbrier wind power case" style="BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none">State court to hear Greenbrier wind power case</a></div></p><p><p><strong>Tags:</strong> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/actions' rel='tag'>actions</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/cases' rel='tag'>cases</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/court' rel='tag'>court</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/decisions' rel='tag'>decisions</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/industrial' rel='tag'>industrial</a> </p><p><strong>Posted by:</strong> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup'>cwwgroup</a></p> Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:56:41 -0000 http://www.wind-watch.org/news/2007/11/01/defendants-in-mt-storm-wind-lawsuit-specified <p></p><p><strong>Comments:</strong><ul><li>Charleston attorney and former Supreme Court justice Richard Neely, representing the plaintiffs in the case, argued to Judge Phil Jordan of the 21st Circuit that Shell should be included in the suit because he has been unable to get information from NedPower or Shell to pursue his case. He said that the suit was originally filed “before the first footer was laid” and NedPower was the entity listed as building the project. <small>posted by <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup'>cwwgroup</a></small></li></ul></p><p><strong>Tags:</strong> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/actions' rel='tag'>actions</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/court' rel='tag'>court</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/decisions' rel='tag'>decisions</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/lawsuits' rel='tag'>lawsuits</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/legal' rel='tag'>legal</a> </p><p><strong>Posted by:</strong> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup'>cwwgroup</a></p> Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:08:35 -0000 http://www.littlefallstimes.com/articles/2008/01/07/news/news5.txt <p></p><p><strong>Tags:</strong> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/actions' rel='tag'>actions</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/court' rel='tag'>court</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/decisions' rel='tag'>decisions</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/jordanville' rel='tag'>jordanville</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/law' rel='tag'>law</a> </p><p><strong>Posted by:</strong> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup'>cwwgroup</a></p> Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:55:24 -0000 http://www.uticaod.com/news/x1091757187 <p></p><p><strong>Comments:</strong><ul><li>WARREN — A new court ruling will delay the Jordanville Wind project and is raising questions whether the developer might drop the project in southern Herkimer County. State Supreme Court Justice Donald Greenwood of Onondaga County ruled that the Warren Town Board failed to look closely enough at the project’s potential impact. The town was the lead agency for a state-required environmental review. The town’s process and decision to approve the review was “arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion,” Greenwood’s decision states. <small>posted by <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup'>cwwgroup</a></small></li></ul></p><p><strong>Tags:</strong> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/actions' rel='tag'>actions</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/court' rel='tag'>court</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/decisions' rel='tag'>decisions</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/jordanville' rel='tag'>jordanville</a> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup/law' rel='tag'>law</a> </p><p><strong>Posted by:</strong> <a href='http://www.diigo.com/user/cwwgroup'>cwwgroup</a></p> Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:35:45 -0000 60