Member since Nov 26, 2006, follows 0 people, 0 public groups, 106 public bookmarks (106 total).
More »
Tags
| Recent Tags: | |
|---|---|
| Top Tags: |
More »
Recent Bookmarks and Annotations
- The Lounge @ ZuneCorps on 2008-01-03
- Google Toolbar 5 for IE - Google Blogoscoped Forum on 2007-12-19
- Here Comes Everybody - News - The Stranger, Seattle's Only Newspaper on 2007-11-26
- More Friday sales at local Apple retailers - The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) on 2007-11-24
-
New Zune review (part 2): upgrade, hardware, software and Social - Engadget on 2007-11-19
-
CORRECTIONS:
Zune 30 DOES NOT really have h264 or MPEG-4 support....it still has to transcode everything since the codecs are hardware based.
Also, Zune software DOES have a ID3 Tag Editor (you have to click List View of Music), but it sucks and is not nearly powerful or flexible enough. Also, it only works with music, but not videos or podcasts (stupid). -
Speaking of accessories, all of my Zune 30 accessories work with my Zune80. All I had to do with my Zune 30 Dock was remove the faceplate on top and below it is another faceplate that the 80 fits in. No additional adapter needed. It fits snuggly. With the dock working, I was also able to control it with the Zune 30 wireless remote as well. Nice that MS allowed v1 accessories to be compatible with v2. This was in addition to MS making the v2 firmware available on v1 devices. Thanks MS!
- 1 more annotations...
-
-
New Zune review (part 2): upgrade, hardware, software and Social - Engadget on 2007-11-19
-
I have a Zune 80 and am very pleased with it.
For those curious about the sound, I listen using Denon C700's and my MP3's are at 256kps. Under these conditions there is a lot of good to say about the Z80, it has a neutral sound and exhibits no hiss whatsoever at idle or during quiet passages even on high sensitivity IEM's that are so prevalent today. Occasionally, if one really pushes the interface while not listening to music a slight drive interference is audible. Not an issue during playback, even when thrashing the interface. I also have a sony NZ 818 and would say it sounds slightly more dynamic and richer, but the Zune sounds far, far better than my Sansa E260. In fact, this whole review is suspect to me simply on the ground that the reviewer professes to love the sansa. Horrible sound quality. The Zune sounds better than that and better than a PSP, though I don't have an ipod for comparison, the original Zune was considered the better sounding player, and it would not surprise me to find this is still the case.
The interface itself is quite pleasing and responsive. Despite the QVGA resolution, I suspect most users will find the screen pretty impressive. When I took the unit to work, there was a very positive response. I also doubt I am the only person who finds iTune to be a deal breaker in the iPod equation. The Zune software is simplified, so most folks will use an external program like Media Monkey for tagging and such, but for syncing, and the Marketplace it gets the job done while not being iTunes.
The included headphones on the Z80 are an order of magnitude better than the iPod phones. Night and day here, these are the best sounding pack in phones on the market, besting even the EX series phones Sony included on the NZ 818. One tip for Z80 owners already out there- holding the back button and down on the squircle will fully shut the unit down , as opposed the the battery sucking "hibernate" that you get when holding the Play button. Why this is not documented is beyond me.
All in all, I'd say the Z80 does what I want(media playback) better and more comfortably than the Ipod. It is great for viewing photos and when zoomed, one can use the touch pad to navigate the viewing area. Nice. -
I bought a Zune30 off Woot.com for $100 in anticipation for the new firmware. What a great deal for a solid piece of hardware/software. So far I am loving it. Has FM for in the morning at work. Good podcasts support for mornings also. Larger screen for album art and videos for when traveling. And I love the navigation of the music - being able to go up/down and side to side. It makes browsing through your music much faster than the iPod GUI structure. I used to have an iPod, but it died, so I picked up the Zune for $100. Best money I have every spent. Top notch, and does a good job of filling the features that the iPod left out (Wireless sync, FM radio, faster file navigation). While I loved my iPod, I find the Zune to a much more rounded player.
-
-
New Zune review (part 2): upgrade, hardware, software and Social - Engadget on 2007-11-19
-
but for music nerds it just won't replace or even really expand on powerful discovery sites we like to use to find new artists, like RCRD LBL, Hype Machine, and Critical Metrics.
-
-
stereogum: Stereogum's Sneak Peek At Zune on 2007-11-18
-
Zune's menu navigation is based on the standard hierarchical method that iPod utilizes; their tweak is called TWIST. The device strings the previous menu horizontally across the screen top, keeping everything one click closer (to avoid repeatedly pressing "back" or "menu" to get home). For example, once you've selected "Playlists" from the home menu, your playlist titles are listed across the top of the screen, while the contents of the highlighted playlist appear in the vertical space below. Having a larger screen – and having it oriented vertically – provides more real estate for lists and information, which makes for less scrolling.
-
Why are people so hostile to the music subscription model? I seriously don't get it.
People will pay $15 a month for an XM Satellite subscription. They don't own the music that gets played.
People will buy songs on iTunes for 99 cents a pop. If you think you "own" those tunes you are high. You "own" them as long as you only want to play them back on hardware purchased from Apple and/or do whatever other limited things Apple decides to let you do with them.
What about this example. Lets say I buy one CD per month and I will always buy one CD per month for the rest of my life. It costs around $15 per month.
For that same $15 month I can subscribe to Rhapsody or Napster or Zune (or whatever) and I can take every single album in their library and load it onto my MP3 player. I can listen to every single new album released (ok, limited to the library, but they're pretty inclusive now).
The only objection I hear to this is "but if you don't pay, you lose the music." so what. Why would I quit paying? I already know that I always spend at least $15/month on music anyway so why stop?
And it's not like I dont' buy CDs anyway. I use the subscription service to check out music much more conveniently and much more broadly than I would without the subscripton. If I really like something, I buy it on CD and rip it myself. You get much better quality and there's no DRM.
Makes a world of sense to me. I really don't get why people oppose it.
Posted by: Jake at September 14, 2006 8:15 PM
-
-
Microsoft Zune Review: Zune Device Software on 2007-11-18
-
Zune's core layout and navigation are truly excellent. You'll be up to speed in seconds. When you're viewing a category, all the other categories on that "level" are aligned along the top, and pressing left and right on the controls moves between them.
For example: choose Music from the main menu, and you're looking at the Albums view automatically (or whatever view you left it at). Pressing up and down scrolls you through albums with small artwork. But to the right is Artists, then Playlists, Songs, Genres…you get the idea. On most other players, you select Music and then Artists, Playlists, Genres, whatever. If you want to change the view, you have to back up to the previous interface level and select a different view. Microsoft's approach is considerably faster and easier. This works on all levels of the interface: If you're viewing the contents of Moby's album 18 in album view, then pressing to the right and left will quickly flip you to the next albums in your library…1984, 20, Abbey Road, All Killer No Filler, American Idiot…
<!-- start ziffimage //-->
-
-
Paul Thurrott's SuperSite for Windows: Portable Media Center Review on 2007-11-18
-
I'd like to highlight an innovative navigational feature in the PMC UI that I think of as "horizontal navigation." Microsoft calls it twist navigation.
You may be familiar with the purely vertical navigational schemes of devices like the iPod. In such a device, you're presented with a text menu of choices, through which you can scroll up and down. When you select a menu choice, you're presented with a sub-menu, through which you can also scroll up and down. And as you dive deeper and deeper into the UI, it gets harder and harder to find your way out. For example, to find a particular song on my iPod, I might select Music, then scroll to Artists, hit Select, scroll the to the artist name, hit Select, scroll to the appropriate album name, hit Select, and then scroll to the appropriate song name, and hit Select again to play the song. If I decide to play a different song by a different artist, I then have to hit Menu, Menu, Menu before I can select a new artist. And then, of course, I have to go through the same set of tasks to go find the song. In, out, in out, round and round we go. Each artist is in its own bucket.
The PMC lets you do this if you're a masochist. But it also supports a "home" button that jumps you right to the Start Page, and the horizontal navigational scheme I mentioned previously. Let's use the same example as before to see how this works on a PMC. From the Start Page, you select My Music to see a list of my music. As with the iPod, you do see a list of choices, but this time it presents artist names by default (Figure). You could scroll down the list vertically, as with the iPod, but you can also scroll horizontally to see other choices. In My Music, these choices are Playlists, Songs, Genres, New, Albums, and then aforementioned Artists.
Fine, you're thinking, but the iPod offers some of these choices right in the Music menu. True enough. So let's navigate down into the artist list and choose an artist, like we did on the iPod (Figure). Then, we'll select an album, as before (Figure), and the song (Figure). When we play a song on a PMC, you get a vastly richer experience (Figure)than what's available on any other portable device, but we're going to ignore that for now. Instead, we're going to look at what's available navigationally. So the song is playing, and as before, we want to listen to a different song, from a different artist. If you click Back, you can then move left and right through all of the songs in the current album (Figure). Click Back again, and you can move horizontally through all of the albums by the current artist (Figure). But when you click Back a third time, you can move horizontally through all of the artists on your device (Figure). So why is this better? It's doesn't appear to use fewer steps. But under each artist name, you get choices for playing all, adding to portable playlist, and then a list of that artist's albums. You don't have to go up and down, up and down, to select songs. And you can simply move left and right to get to other artists. Imagine how laborious it would be to create an On-the-Go Playlist with an iPod using a strictly navigational structure. Not only is it easier on the PMC, you get little album art graphics as you navigate through the hierarchy.
-
Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »
Join Diigo