joshua wilson's Profile

Member since Dec 25, 2007, follows 0 people, 0 public groups, 363 public bookmarks (1481 total).

More »
Tags

Recent Tags:
Top Tags:

More »
Recent Bookmarks and Annotations

  • If the universe is teeming with ... - Google Books on 2009-10-29
  • Great Filter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on 2009-10-29
      • Main argument


        We have not yet observed evidence of intelligent extraterrestrial life, though we have observed a great number of stars. Therefore, the whole process of starting with a star, and ending with communicating intelligent life, must be unlikely (the Great Filter). This implies that at least one step in this process must be improbable. Robin Hanson listed the likely steps as:



        1. The right star system (including organics & potentially habitable planets)
        2. Reproductive molecules (e.g. RNA)
        3. Simple (prokaryotic) single-cell life
        4. Complex (archaeatic & eukaryotic) single-cell life
        5. Sexual reproduction
        6. Multi-cell life
        7. Tool-using animals with big brains
        8. Colonization explosion


        Hanson considers this list to be incomplete.


        At least one of these steps must be improbable. If it's not 1-7, then the implication is that our future (step 8) is bleak. If 1-7 are likely, then many civilizations would have developed to the current level of the human race. However, none appear to have made it to step 8, or the Milky Way would be full of colonies. So perhaps step 8 is the unlikely one, and the only thing that appears likely to keep us from step 8 is some sort of catastrophe. So by this argument, finding multicellular life on Mars (provided it evolved independently) would be bad news, since it would imply steps 2-6 are easy, and hence only 1, 7 or 8 could be the big problem.


        Although steps 1-7 have occurred on Earth any one of these may be unlikely. If the first seven steps are necessary preconditions to calculating the likelihood (using the local environment) then an anthropically biased observer can infer nothing about the general probabilities from its (pre-determined) surroundings.

  • Astronomy - encyclopedia article - Citizendium on 2009-10-29
      • Major questions in astronomy


        Although the scientific discipline of astronomy has made tremendous strides in understanding the nature of the universe and its contents, there remain some important unanswered questions. Answers to these may require the construction of new ground and space-based instruments, and possibly new developments in theoretical and experimental physics.


        • Are there Earth-like planets around other stars? Astronomers have found massive stars and disks of debris around other stars. So the existence of smaller, terrestrial planets seems likely.[44]
        • Is there other life in the universe? Especially, is there other intelligent life? If so, what is the explanation for the Fermi paradox? The existence of life elsewhere has important scientific and philosophical implications.[45][46]
        • What is the nature of dark matter and dark energy? These dominate the evolution and fate of the cosmos, yet we are still uncertain about their true nature.[47]
        • Why did the universe come to be? Why, for example, are the physical constants so finely tuned that they permit the existence of life?
        • What caused the cosmic inflation that produced our homogeneous universe?[48]
  • Fermi paradox - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on 2009-10-29
    • Another closely related question is the Great Silence[3]—even if travel is hard, if life is common, why don't we detect their radio transmissions?
    • Counterarguments suggest that intelligent extraterrestrial life does not exist or occurs so rarely that humans will never make contact with it.
    • 1 more annotations...
  • Theory of cognitive development - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on 2009-03-27
  • How to Survive the Crash and Save the Earth on 2008-12-14
    • Technology will save us. If it does, it will be something we don't even recognize as "technology" -- permaculture or orgonomy or water vortices or forest gardening or quantum consciousness or the next generation of the tribe. It will not be a new germ killer or resource extractor or power generator or anything to give us what we want while exempting us from being aware and respectful of other life. Anything like that will just dig us deeper in the same hole.
  • SurvivalBlog.com on 2008-12-14
  • A Strategy for Apocalypse on 2008-12-14
    • No, the financial
      and political pundits don't get it yet; their big picture just isn't
      big enough. What they're missing is why all this collapsing
      needs to happen: they're missing the meaning of it, the spiritual
      dimension of it; and they don't understand the inevitability of
      it. Those are the things I try to talk about in these pages.
  • What Is a Viable Community? on 2008-12-14
    • A place where people are
      able to self-sufficiently produce all the basics of food, shelter,
      energy, clothing, tools, medical care, etc. needed for survival,
      while getting along with one another and handling community problems
      well, and maintaining good relations with neighboring communities
      or else dealing effectively with outsiders who threaten or attack.
    • When the shit hits the fan, it might
      be next to impossible to sustain a viable community in any area
      of the "developed" world that is currently urban or suburban.
    • 4 more annotations...
  • Downsizing to 100 square feet of bliss - CNN.com on 2008-12-14
    • They've squeezed into a 154-square-foot home that looks more like a kid's playhouse than their previous 1,800-square-foot home.
    • says it's exhilarating to no longer feel compelled to keep up with the Joneses. "There's a tremendous burden that's off your shoulders," she says. "Small is OK, and it might even be better."
    • 1 more annotations...

Diigo is about better ways to research, share and collaborate on information. Learn more »

Join Diigo