Member since Jul 31, 2008, follows 5 people, 1 public groups, 74 public bookmarks (75 total).
More »
Tags
| Recent Tags: |
|
|---|---|
| Top Tags: |
|
More »
Recent Bookmarks and Annotations
-
What Works: The Web Way vs. The Wave Way - Anil Dash on 2009-08-15
-
(In tech, three days in personal effort often translates to three months of corporate effort.)
-
(In tech, three days in personal effort often translates to three months of corporate effort.)
-
-
Maestro Maazel On Life After N.Y. Philharmonic : NPR Music on 2009-07-06
-
He recalls once asking his fellow judges in a competition for conductors: "Can you define what a conductor is? You know what a conductor does, but what is a conductor?" They all said they didn't know, but they recognized one when they saw one, Maazel says.
-
"It's unmistakable, a natural-born conductor," Maazel says. "[A] certain ability to identify with the musical discourse, instinctively — and that can't be taught."
- 5 more annotations...
-
-
Building Businesses in Turbulent Times — HBS Working Knowledge on 2009-07-01
-
We can't fix our current economic problems by simply spending more money to buy bad debt. Rather, we need real innovation that creates jobs and drives productive economic growth.
-
Companies that survive the financial crisis by identifying and exploiting innovation will serve as economic growth engines in the future—and will be the industry leaders of tomorrow.
-
-
Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog: IT doesn't matter, part 8 on 2009-06-29
-
The smartest users of technology – here again, Dell and Wal-Mart stand out – stay well back from the cutting edge, waiting to make purchases until standards and best practices solidify. They let their impatient competitors shoulder the high costs of experimentation, and then they sweep past them, spending less and getting more.
-
The 25 companies that delivered the highest economic returns, for example, spent on average just 0.8% of their revenues on IT, while the typical company spent 3.7%. A recent study by Forrester Research showed, similarly, that the most lavish spenders on IT rarely post the best results. Even Oracle’s Larry Ellison, one of the great technology salesmen, admitted in a recent interview that “most companies spend too much [on IT] and get very little in return.” As the opportunities for IT-based advantage continue to narrow, the penalties for overspending will only grow.
-
-
Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog: IT doesn't matter, part 7 on 2009-06-29
-
When a resource becomes essential to competition but inconsequential to strategy, the risks it creates become more important than the advantages it provides.
-
The operational risks associated with IT are many – technical glitches, obsolescence, service outages, unreliable vendors or partners, security breaches, even terrorism – and some have become magnified as companies have moved from tightly controlled, proprietary systems to open, shared ones
- 3 more annotations...
-
-
Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog: IT doesn't matter, part 6 on 2009-06-29
-
Just a few months ago, at the 2003 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Bill Joy, the chief scientist and cofounder of Sun Microsystems, posed what for him must have been a painful question: “What if the reality is that people have already bought most of the stuff they want to own?” The people he was talking about are, of course, businesspeople, and the stuff is information technology. With the end of the great buildout of the commercial IT infrastructure apparently at hand, Joy’s question is one that all IT vendors are now asking themselves. There is good reason to believe that companies’ existing IT capabilities are largely sufficient for their needs and, hence, that the recent and widespread sluggishness in IT demand is as much a structural as a cyclical phenomenon.
-
(Michael Dell’s essential genius has always been his unsentimental trust in the commoditization of information technology.) And many of the major suppliers of corporate IT, including Microsoft, IBM, Sun, and Oracle, are battling to position themselves as dominant suppliers of “Web services” – to turn themselves, in effect, into utilities.
-
-
Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog: IT doesn't matter, part 5 on 2009-06-29
-
AHS gained a true competitive advantage by capitalizing on characteristics of infrastructural technologies that are common in the early stages of their buildouts, in particular their high cost and lack of standardization
-
In a few cases, the dominance companies gained through IT innovation conferred additional advantages, such as scale economies and brand recognition, that have proved more durable than the original technological edge. Wal-Mart and Dell Computer are renowned examples of firms that have been able to turn temporary technological advantages into enduring positioning advantages.
- 1 more annotations...
-
-
Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog: IT doesn't matter, part 4 on 2009-06-29
-
Why write your own application for word processing or e-mail or, for that matter, supply-chain management when you can buy a ready-made, state-of-the-art application for a fraction of the cost? But it’s not just the software that is replicable. Because most business activities and processes have come to be embedded in software, they become replicable, too. When companies buy a generic application, they buy a generic process as well. Both the cost savings and the interoperability benefits make the sacrifice of distinctiveness unavoidable.
-
More and more, companies will fulfill their IT requirements simply by purchasing fee-based “Web services” from third parties – similar to the way they currently buy electric power or telecommunications services.
- 3 more annotations...
-
-
Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog: IT doesn't matter, part 3 on 2009-06-29
-
The trap that executives often fall into, however, is assuming that opportunities for advantage will be available indefinitely. In actuality, the window for gaining advantage from an infrastructural technology is open only briefly.
-
By the end of the buildout phase, the opportunities for individual advantage are largely gone. The rush to invest leads to more competition, greater capacity, and falling prices, making the technology broadly accessible and affordable.
- 2 more annotations...
-
-
Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog: IT doesn't matter, part 2 on 2009-06-29
-
In the earliest phases of its buildout, however, an infrastructural technology can take the form of a proprietary technology. As long as access to the technology is restricted – through physical limitations, intellectual property rights, high costs, or a lack of standards – a company can use it to gain advantages over rivals.
-
Companies can also steal a march on their competitors by having superior insight into the use of a new technology.
-
More »
Groups
Daniel Wood follows 5 people
Highlighter, Sticky notes, Tagging, Groups and Network: integrated suite dramatically boosting research productivity. Learn more »
Join Diigo