Lee Dunn's List: THE TALMUDISTS

• NO   ADL, NO HATE CRIME LAWS
• By   Rev. Ted Pike
    December 20, 2009
    NewsWithViews.com
• The   Anti-Defamation League is not backing down from its outrageous claim that   millions of Americans are conspiring against Obama!
• ADL’s recent   report, Rage in America: Anti-Government Conspiracies, claims   millions of anti-Obama Americans, consumed with "toxic rage,"   will say almost anything necessary to bring the President down.
• But   spokeswoman Myrna Shinbaum says the backlash against ADL is simply a misunderstanding:
• “The comments are coming from people who have not read the report…They’re   reacting to the media spin and not its substance.”
• (Jewish Telegraph   Agency, -Conservatives   Rap ADL Report on Anti-Government Anger, Dec. 1)
• It’s certainly not the   mainstream liberal media that usually works in lockstep to give ADL initiatives   maximum publicity.
• What   “media” is misrepresenting ADL?
• With only a handful of exceptions, the media has said   nothing, pro or con, about Rage in America.
• Why? Big media is embarrassed   by ADL.
• If its claim that millions of Americans are conspirators were   not so sinister, it would be laughable.
• The   “media” to which Shinbaum refers is a string of recent articles:   Jonathan Tobin in Commentary, Joseph Farah in WorldNetDaily,   Rev. Ted Pike at www.truthtellers.org, Joel Sprayregen in American   Thinker, and Rabbi   Nachum Shifren in NewsWithViews.
• These commentaries—now viral   online—have probably embarrassed ADL more than anything since the   1988 Spotlight expose of ADL’s illegal surveillance of   over 10,000 unsuspecting Americans.
• (See my video, Hate   Laws: Making Criminals of Christians at truthtellers.org for complete   documentation.)
• But   ADL is unrepentant. It has an agenda and schedule to keep—persecuting   Christians and conservatives under its hate crime laws worldwide.
• In a   recent fund-raising appeal, ADL national director Abe Foxman complained   of a worldwide “explosion of anti-Semitism that is shocking in its   intensity and unprecedented in its reach into the mainstream.”
• ADL   wants to bull its way forward, persuading all nations of the world to   criminalize any criticism of matters Jewish.
• The cleverest legal means   is their brainchild: hate crimes laws.
• To eventually   imprison enormous numbers of those who oppose ADL’s new world order,   ADL must prepare the public to view Christian conservatives as anti-Semitic   and violence-prone.
• This has begun with ADL’s Office of Global Anti-Semitism   in the US State Department.
• In its latest report to Congress, the Office   says “classic anti-Semites” include at least 100 million Christians   who affirm the New Testament account that the Jews masterminded the crucifixion   of Christ.
• (See U.S.   State Department Says New Testament is 'Anti-Semitic'?)
• This is an   extremely threatening charge by the U.S. government against Bible-believing   Americans and Christians everywhere.
• In Canada, it is a hate crime to   publicly state that the Jews were responsible for Christ's death. It is   punishable by a minimum fine of $5,000 and prison if the offense is repeated.
• For   the past five years, ADL has united 56 nations of Europe into an “anti-hate”   confederation (the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe,   OSCE) dedicated to ending “homophobia,” xenophobia, anti-Semitism,   and ultimately free speech online.
• Yet in a recent report, ADL laments   that its European hate law agenda is not progressing as rapidly as planned.
• At last month's OSCE conference in Warsaw, ADL berated member states for   failing to vigorously enact and enforce more hate laws. It also criticized   them for neglecting to gather statistics ADL can dramatize as proving   that an "epidemic of hate" exists in Europe, necessitating even   more hate laws.
• ADL calls this year’s OSCE report a “revealing   portrait of the failure of too many governments to recognize the unique   problem of hate crime.”
• “The League’s analysis of the   data found that a total of 23 governments failed to gather hate crime   data or make it publicly available.
• ADL also highlighted nine countries   that reported fewer than 10—and in some cases zero—hate crimes.   Only eight of the 56 governments submitted information…on incidents   of anti-Semitism.”
• (See Global   Hate Crimes Gestapo Being Created)
• It may   well be that some political leaders in recalcitrant countries not under   the strictest ADL control are gradually awakening to the dangers of hate   laws through hearing the horror stories of hate law persecution in other   nations.
• They also may be receiving a comprehensive education on the twisted   reasoning, abuses, and ultimate conspiracy of ADL hate laws from the premier   international site opposing hate laws, www.truthtellers.org.
• ADL's   participation in every aspect of a hate crimes bureaucracy is vital to   creating ADL's ideal: a totally repressive Gestapo, mercilessly indicting   dissident speech in a manner that is fiercely punitive.
• This is what ADL's   northern branches, B'nai B'rith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress,   have brought to Canada since 1971, when ADL's hate law was passed -- after   a decade of ADL lobbying.
• Running Canada's hate bureaucracy has been entirely   their project -- one which they direct at every stage and of which they   are immensely and very publicly proud.
• How   to Kill America's Hate Law
• What   is the most effective way to keep America’s new ADL hate law from   being enforced?
• It’s simple. The more credibility ADL loses—as   happened in the last two weeks—the harder it will be for the League   to persuade the government to pursue hate crime indictments.
• If ADL’s   credibility is destroyed, hate laws will become unenforceable. In America,   virtually no one but ADL cares about sending Christians and conservatives   to prison as “anti-Semites” and “homophobic” hate   criminals.
• Without ADL management of hate crime bureaucracies and orchestration   of prosecution, even the militant homosexual lobby will have to be content   to coexist with the Christian community rather than prosecute it.
• The   most practical, attainable way to pull the teeth of the new federal hate   law is not through legal action, supplicating liberal judges to declare   it unconstitutional.
• They may actually be delighted to receive such appeals   and use them to uphold the Constitutionality of the hate law and even   broaden it to cover verbal violence against sodomites.
• The   most direct way to neutralize the hate bill is to destroy, by every truthful   means, the reputation of the Anti-Defamation League.
• Tens of thousands   of patriots should tell as many as possible about ADL’s 96-year   record of subverting America’s values and freedoms.
• An excellent   way to start is for groups, especially churches, college clubs and political   organizations, to view my 82-minute video Hate Laws: Making Criminals   of Christians at www.truthtellers.org.
• This fast-moving, easily understood documentary presents the history of   ADL, particularly how it took away free speech in Canada.
• It also reveals   how, through influencing US legislative bodies as well as policies of   the US justice system, it intends to end freedom in America.
• Despite   its staggering international power and immediate threat to very high profile   potential critics, such as Glenn Beck, Joseph Farah, Michael Savage, etc.,   never in ADL’s history has the average citizen been more secure   from ADL's smear, "Anti-Semite!"
• This is a unique time because   ADL faces a myriad of what it considers anti-Semitic attacks, especially   on the internet and in the United Nations.
• It simply cannot diversify   to individually assault thousands of grassroots Americans, who can speak   out.
• Do you   still think you can’t make a difference in dismantling ADL’s   power?
• Thousands   of Americans, grieved by the specter of a national hate crimes bureaucracy   being set up in America, can unite to tarnish ADL. Then, what may be happening   in many OSCE countries will happen in America.
• Without a credible ADL   goading the Attorney General, FBI and police against Christian "hate   criminals," the federal hate law will become a despised relic of   legislative history—rusting and decrepit like monuments of the former   Soviet Union.
• The   people will never allow it to be used against them.
• © 2009   Rev. Ted Pike - All Rights Reserved
• Rev.   Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative   watchdog organization. He is a 1971 graduate of Portland State University,   with emphasis in art and philosophy. He is also an accomplished filmmaker,   poet, sculptor, and painter. Some of his paintings are featured in the   ninth annual edition of New Art International by Bookart Press. He has   appeared on more than 550 radio and TV talk shows since August 2004, educating   the public concerning the danger to free speech posed by "anti-hate"   laws.
• Rev.   Ted Pike's outreach is largely responsible for international publicity   concerning the arrest and imprisonment of 11 Christians in Philadelphia   on October 10, 2004. They were threatened with 47 years in prison for   the "hate crime" of publicly witnessing to homosexuals.

• Decades   of research and activism have resulted in the production of a book and   multiple video documentaries. Rev. Ted Pike, as no other, has the expertise   and experience to explain the very complicated subject of hate laws in   a manner that is lively, inoffensive, and easy to understand.

   

  To   watch 7-minute previews of Rev. Pike's four major video documentaries,   as well as to read dozens of his articles, browse www.truthtellers.org.

   

  To   watch full-length presentations of his videos, go to www.video.google.com

   

  For   interview, Rev. Pike can be reached at 503-631-3808, emailed at www.truthtellers.org,   or contacted by mail at National Prayer Network, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas,   OR 97015.

   

  E-mail:   tedpike@truthtellers.org

58 more annotations...

• Is "The Riddle of Anti Semitism" a "Hate Message"?
• March 17, 2009
• The Canadian Jewish Congress & the Canadian Human Rights Commission want this Sept. 2004 article (and others like it) removed from my website on the grounds that it exposes Jews to "hatred and contempt." This ridiculous ploy is designed to enforce Zionist control over discourse, demonize their opponents and prevent Jews from asking questions. Their action confirms the very thing they deny.
• ORIGIN OF ANTI SEMITISM
• It should come as no surprise that the people who own and control the world have put their interests before the greater good of humanity. Obviously many of these are not Jewish.
• For at least 400 years, Christian civilization has been under covert attack by a diabolical multi-generational program now called the "New World Order", "globalization" or "world government."
• Essentially globalization represents the consolidation of absolute economic, political and cultural power in the hands of a cabal of super rich dynastic families (bankers and their vast corporate networks) headquartered in the City of London.
• The UN, IMF and World Bank are some of their instruments.
• These families include the Rothschilds, Warburgs and other so-called Jews who have intermarried with Anglo American and European aristocracy.
• Non-Jewish dynastic families include the Russell's, the Cecils and the Churchill's.
• This mirrors the collaboration between the moneylenders and kings in the Middle Ages when the Jew shared the proceeds from his lucrative business with the king in return for protection.
• The New World Order will resurrect the feudal relationship between a wealthy aristocracy and a large impoverished serfdom with a small intermediary class of soldiers/police and technocrats.
• These dynastic families have embraced Freemasonry, an occult secret society that worships Lucifer. The top rank of this cabal is called the "Illuminati."
• The Illuminati uses anti-Semitism to manipulate Jews and others.
• Jews figure prominently in Illuminati sponsored movements such as Communism, Zionism, Socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Feminism, and Neo Conservatism.
• Most of these Jews are opportunists or idealistic dupes who think they are building a secular utopia based on reason and not a world police state straight out of George Orwell's "1984".
• For example they set up Communism to attract opponents of private property. They set up Nazism for people who champion nation and race, and hate "Jewish" hegemony.
• The Illuminati strategy is divide-and-rule, i.e. get their enemies to destroy each other.
• Then they attacked and destroyed each other.
• For example, this recently appeared in a book review on Amazon.
• As long as Jews play a disproportionate role in the New World Order, some opposition will be expressed in terms of Anti-Semitism.
• "It isn't Jews dying in Iraq. Our boys are dying for their war on their enemies. Americans are just hostages. Our government and media is hostage to Israel First Americans. "
• DEFENSE MECHANISM
• It is a healthy defense mechanism of mainly Christian and Moslem nations, cultures, races and religions that are threatened by a gradual and insidious process of extinction (i.e. world government.)
• Anti-Semitism is not an irrational hatred or sickness in the Gentile soul, as Jews imagine.
• Most "anti Semitic" books I've seen are remarkably free of hatred and rancor. They do not advocate violence against Jews but present measures to retain national and racial character similar to those practiced by Jews in Israel today.
• They tend to be reasonable and portray the Gentile as a feckless victim of superior Jewish intelligence. Leon de Poncins would even accept Jewish leadership if it were benign.
• "The Jew championed reason against the mythical world of the spirit," de Poncins relates. "He was the doctor of unbelief; all who were mentally in revolt came to him..."(Judaism and the Vatican, p. 116)
• Competition between "Christian" and "Jewish" worldviews is perhaps the central factor in the development of the western world.
• "The Jewish Question" has been a major issue for hundreds of years.
• As early as 1879, a German writer lamented that it cannot be discussed honestly.
• "While a sense of delicacy is wholly absent among the Jews [when satirizing Germans], it is demanded of us that we handle them like fine glassware or extremely sensitive plants."
• "Since 1848 if we Germans so much as criticized any little thing Jewish, it was enough to have us entirely outlawed from the press," wrote Wilhelm Marr.
• (Anti-Semitism in the Modern World: An Anthology 1991, p.85)
• THEODOR FRITSCH (1852-1934)
• Called "the most influential German anti-Semite before Hitler," Fritsch's most influential book Handbuch der Judenfrage 1896 (Handbook of the Jewish Question) went through dozens of printings, and was taught in German schools during the Nazi era. Most copies were destroyed after World War Two.
• It is extremely rare; original copies cost as much as $1000.
• "Handbook" was translated into English in 1927 and titled "The Riddle of the Jew's Success" by F. Roderich-Stoltheim, a pen name.
• His central point is that Judaism does not deserve credit for monotheism because the Jewish God is not universal.
• Fritsch does not fit the image of hate monger foaming at the mouth. His book impresses me as the work a civilized man with considerable spiritual discernment.
• "It is a fatal mistake of our theologians to regard the Jewish God as identical with the Christian. On a closer examination, Jehovah is found to be the exclusive God of Jew-dom and not, at the same time, that of other men."
• He cites many passages from the Old Testament to demonstrate that the Covenant between Jews and their God "bears a hostile meaning for all non- Jewish people."
• For example, "Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance and the uttermost parts of the world for thy possession. Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron..." (Psalms 2.8.9) Or "Thou wilt devour all nations which the Lord thy God will give thee. Thou shalt have no mercy on them...(Moses 5.7.16) (p.55)
• Fritsch cites many references to show it is permitted to lie, cheat or steal from a Gentile. (pp. 57-65)
• As a consequence, the Talmud (the Jewish code of law) distinguishes one system of morality for Jews and another for Gentiles who are regarded as cattle or swine.
• Since these beliefs are kept secret from non-Jews, he says Judaism is a conspiracy against non-Jews. Its aim is to fulfill the Covenant, and gain dominion over mankind by controlling wealth.
• Fritsch concludes that anti-Semitism is a natural reaction to these hostile attitudes which he claims are actually practised by many Jews.
• He claims that all Jews are part of this scheme and none can be excepted. I respect the right of Germans to a national homeland but I think he is wrong to judge all Jews by one racist standard.
• Jews are individuals and should be judged by their individual actions. The vast majority are alienated from Judaism and would find the Biblical passages cited above repugnant.
• How would he like to be condemned for what other Germans (e.g. Nazis) did or said?
• CONCLUSION
• I cannot overstate the significance of the Jewish rejection of Christ.
• Jews need to re-examine their relationship with Judaism.
• Christ represented a universal God and a universal morality. His teaching represented the natural next stage, which Jews should have embraced, while retaining their racial integrity.
• By rejecting Christ's teaching, the Pharisees placed the Jewish people in perpetual opposition to the best interests of humanity, to the ultimate and inevitable path of human spiritual evolution.
• They have placed Jews in a state of permanent metaphysical revolt which on a personal level leads to alienation and dysfunction.
• Christ taught that God is Love. Love is the Master Plan. Love is Light.
• Love thy neighbor. Do unto others, as you would have them do unto you. By giving of ourselves we find our true selves.

• What fault could Pharisees have with a gospel that preaches human brotherhood and putting others before yourself? Doing unto others as you would have them do unto you?

    

  It denies their special claim, as God's "chosen people" which in practice means self-made Gods.
• Growing up means recognizing that other people are special in God's eyes too.
• Think of a child that doesn't want to grow up. One who thinks he can do anything he wants. Who doesn't have to consider others. Who is never wrong and so never admits it.
• Who thinks any opposition must be motivated by irrational hatred i.e. "anti-Semitism" and not his own behavior.
• Think arrested development. Think Canadian Jewish Congress. Think New World Order.
• Comments for "Is "The Riddle of Anti Semitism" a "Hate Message"?"
• David said (March 19, 2009):
• I couldn’t help but see the line in your last editorial where you wrote “What fault could Pharisees have with a gospel that preaches human brotherhood and putting others before yourself? Doing unto others as you would have them do unto you?”
• I suspect that you already know the answer, but nonetheless it is worth stating.
• Judaistic Pharisaism has nothing to do with the worship of the true God of Abraham, but is all about money, manipulation, and control for an “inside crowd” who saw themselves as “illuminated” and above the common herd by virtue of their breeding and education.
• These were the same people who were cornering the market for the pure silver half shekel that was used exclusively for temple taxes in biblical times, gouging those who had tithes & offerings to enrich themselves.
• Nothing has changed today. These Pharisaic peers of Jesus Christ are the same spiritual ancestors of the current cartel of central bank owners who subscribe to the same selfish creed which at its core is the Talmudic Kabbalah.
• There was once a man who attempted to drive them out of the temple and he was subsequently crucified.
• As you know, the Kabbalah is what some have called the “blood and bone” of Talmudic Judaism, which is Babylonian Pharisaism, and its Gentile cousin, Freemasonry.
• “The beginnings of Talmudic literature date back to the time of the Babylonian exile in the Sixth pre-Christian Century.”
• To clarify these links, we recall that a chief Rabbi of Great Britain, J. H. Hertz, wrote in the Forward to the first English translation of the Babylonian Talmud:
• Rabbi Louis Finklestein, former head of Jewish Theological Seminary of America, wrote of the “The Pharisees”:
• “Pharisaism became Talmudism…But the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered.”
• We also note that the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia of 1943 states:
• “The Jewish religion as it is today traces its decent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees...The Talmud…is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism.”
• Just as a side note, Jesus Christ himself called Pharisaism the “Synagogue of Satan” (Rev 2:9, 3:9). I believe that probably makes him the first "Anti Semite" along with the likes of Armadinejad if you consider the modern definition of the term.
• If you consider this claim curious then read on. He might not have been getting all worked up when he said it...
• In linking Pharisaism with Freemasonry, Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise, a major figure and pioneer of Reform Judaism in America, stated in 1855: “Freemasonry is a Jewish establishment, whose history, grades, official appointments, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end.”
• The Jewish Tribune stated in 1927, “Freemasonry is based on Judaism. Eliminate the teachings of Judaism from the Masonic ritual and what is left?”
• “It is, in fact, the Cabalistic elements in Freemasonry that act as the main driving force in the envenomed and aggressive opposition of the later to Christianity, and its never-flagging efforts for the undermining and destruction of the Christian organization of society.”
• “The Kabbalah is the key of all Masonry and the occult sciences…”
• Also, Albert Pike, a Freemasonic Luminary of the 19th Century stated in his Morals and Dogma,
• “The Kabbalah teaches magic or the art of intercourse with spirits and supernatural beings”
• Elizabeth Dilling wrote in The Jewish Religion:
• Further, Edith Starr Miller wrote in Occult Theocrasy,
• Its Influence Today, “Kabbalah, means ‘tradition,’ and it is the tradition of the paganisms of Babylon, Egypt, and the pagan philosophers, enshrined in the Jewish religion.” “The Jewish Cabala is a library of literature, all on magic and spiritism, and based on sheer pantheism.”
• “The Hasidist branch of Judaism specializes in the Cabala.”
• As you know, these all are at their highest levels nothing short of Luciferianism.
• So here we find the linkage between Judaistic Pharisaism, the occult, witchcraft, & freemasonry whose common mortar are the paganistic traditions of the Kabbalah.
• As you have quoted on your site, Harold Wallace Rosenthal in a 1976 interview stated that "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer...and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive."
• It goes without saying that it would be possible to link most of the significant people that run this world, its media, and its finances to either Freemasonry or societies with like beliefs and practices.
• Despite their heinous beliefs and practices I should note that from amongst their ranks in biblical times came one of the most well known Christian converts, the Apostle Paul, so there is hope for perhaps some of them.
• I cannot help but see however the parallels of today’s situation to that of biblical times.
• I see nothing has changed whatsoever in regard to the age old conflict between the luciferic interests amongst Kabbalistic Jews, their occult gentile friends, and the true Israel (that which is in Christ Jesus). I see this conflict reaching a climax in world affairs within my lifetime.
• Ralph said (March 19, 2009):
• Of course, that generalization does not fit all Jews. Even the Askenazi faction have embraced the worst elements of the Talmud.
• The same power that Jesus invoked to throw back the cosmic powers are promised to his followers if it is in the context of the Father's will and modus operadi. How many are willing to do this? It is something that cannot be faked. Since we cannot (or should not) deal with the occult using their tactics, it remains that we must use the tools and tactics that were demonstrated by Jesus.
• By wanting to control the world by any means, mostly foul, the Jews and their willing Zionist Christian counterparts and even radical Islamists are serving the cosmic principalities and powers that have the same mindset.

99 more annotations...

• Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'
• Presidential adviser wrote about crackdown on expressing opinions
• Posted: January 14, 2010
  12:30 am Eastern
  
   

  By Aaron Klein
   <!--- copywrite only show on NON commentary pages as per joseph meeting 8/23/06 ------>   <!-- copyright --> © 2010 WorldNetDaily 
• In a lengthy academic paper, President Obama's regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban "conspiracy theorizing."

  • Yes..especially since "Conspiracy Theory" has an uncanny way of turning into "Conspiracy Fact"; you bald headed, limp dick, Son of'a bitch!
  Add Sticky Note
• Among the beliefs Sunstein would ban is advocating that the theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.
• Sunstein also recommended the government send agents to infiltrate "extremists who supply conspiracy theories" to disrupt the efforts of the "extremists" to propagate their theories.
• In a 2008 Harvard law paper, "Conspiracy Theories," Sunstein and co-author Adrian Vermeule, a Harvard law professor, ask, "What can government do about conspiracy theories?"
• "We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories."
• 
   Cass Sunstein
• In the 30-page paper – obtained and reviewed by WND – Sunstein argues the best government response to "conspiracy theories" is "cognitive infiltration of extremist groups."
• Continued Sunstein:
• "We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity."
• Sunstein said government agents "might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."
• Sunstein defined a conspiracy theory as "an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role."
• Some "conspiracy theories" recommended for ban by Sunstein include:
• • "The theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud."  
    
    
  • "The view that the Central Intelligence Agency was responsible for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy."  
    
    
  • "The 1996 crash of TWA flight 800 was caused by a U.S. military missile."  
    
    
  • "The Trilateral Commission is responsible for important movements of the international economy."  
    
    
  • "That Martin Luther King Jr. was killed by federal agents."  
    
    
  • "The moon landing was staged and never actually occurred."
• Sunstein allowed that "some conspiracy theories, under our definition, have turned out to be true."
• He continued: "The Watergate hotel room used by Democratic National Committee was, in fact, bugged by Republican officials, operating at the behest of the White House. In the 1950s, the CIA did, in fact, administer LSD and related drugs under Project MKULTRA, in an effort to investigate the possibility of 'mind control.'”
• Sunstein's paper advocating against the belief that global warming is a deliberate fraud was written before November's climate scandal in which e-mails hacked from the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University in the U.K. indicate top climate researchers conspired to rig data and keep researchers with dissenting views from publishing in leading scientific journals.
• Sunstein: Ban 'right wing' rumors
• Sunstein's paper is not the first time he has advocated banning the free flow of information.

  • He is anti-free speech; anti-Constitution; anti-Bill of Rights. In essence: Sustein is an enemy of the people.
  Add Sticky Note
• WND reported that in a recently released book, "On Rumors," Sunstein argued websites should be obliged to remove "false rumors" while libel laws should be altered to make it easier to sue for spreading such "rumors."
• In the 2009 book, Sunstein cited as a primary example of "absurd" and "hateful" remarks, reports by "right-wing websites" alleging an association between President Obama and Weatherman terrorist William Ayers.
• He also singled out radio talker Sean Hannity for "attacking" Obama regarding the president's "alleged associations."
• Ayers became a name in the 2008 presidential campaign when it was disclosed he worked closely with Obama for years. Obama also was said to have launched his political career at a 1995 fundraiser in Ayers' apartment.
• 'New Deal Fairness Doctrine'
• WND also previously reported Sunstein drew up a "First Amendment New Deal" – a new "Fairness Doctrine" that would include the establishment of a panel of "nonpartisan experts" to ensure "diversity of view" on the airwaves.
• Sunstein compared the need for the government to regulate broadcasting to the moral obligation the U.S. had to impose new rules that outlawed segregation.
• Sunstein's radical proposal, set forth in his 1993 book "The Partial Constitution," received no news media attention and scant scrutiny until the WND report.
• In the book, Sunstein outwardly favors and promotes the "Fairness Doctrine," the abolished FCC policy that required holders of broadcast licenses to present controversial issues of public importance in a manner the government deemed "equitable and balanced."
• Sunstein introduces what he terms his "First Amendment New Deal" to regulate broadcasting in the U.S.
• His proposal, which focuses largely on television, includes a government requirement that "purely commercial stations provide financial subsidies to public television or to commercial stations that agree to provide less profitable but high-quality programming."
• Sunstein wrote it is "worthwhile to consider more dramatic approaches as well."
• He proposes "compulsory public-affairs programming, right of reply, content review by nonpartisan experts or guidelines to encourage attention to public issues and diversity of view."
• The Obama czar argues his regulation proposals for broadcasting are actually presented within the spirit of the Constitution.
• "It seems quite possible that a law that contained regulatory remedies would promote rather than undermine the 'freedom of speech,'" he writes.
• Writes Sunstein: "The idea that government should be neutral among all forms of speech seems right in the abstract, but as frequently applied it is no more plausible than the idea that it should be neutral between the associational interests of blacks and those of whites under conditions of segregation."
• Sunstein contends the landmark case that brought about the Fairness Doctrine, Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, "stresses not the autonomy of broadcasters (made possible only by current ownership rights), but instead the need to promote democratic self-government by ensuring that people are presented with a broad range of views about public issues."
• He continues: "In a market system, this goal may be compromised. It is hardly clear that 'the freedom of speech' is promoted by a regime in which people are permitted to speak only if other people are willing to pay enough to allow them to be heard."

• In his book, Sunstein slams the U.S. courts' unwillingness to "require something like a Fairness Doctrine" to be a result of "the judiciary's lack of democratic pedigree, lack of fact-finding powers and limited remedial authority."   

  He clarifies he is not arguing the government should be free to regulate broadcasting however it chooses.   

  "Regulation designed to eliminate a particular viewpoint would of course be out of bounds. All viewpoint discrimination would be banned," Sunstein writes.   
• But, he says, "at the very least, regulative 'fairness doctrines' would raise no real doubts" constitutionally.

39 more annotations...