Lee Dunn's List: THE NEW FEUDALISM

• U.N. Climate Conference President Connie Hedegaard Resigns

• 
  

           
   
  • Print
     
  •   <script type="text/javascript" src="http://w.sharethis.com/widget/?tabs=email%2Cweb&charset=utf-8&services=digg%2Cfacebook%2Cmyspace%2Cdelicious%2Cstumbleupon%2Ctechnorati%2Cgoogle_bmarks%2Cyahoo_bmarks%2Cyahoo_myweb%2Cwindows_live%2Cfriendfeed%2Cnewsvine%2Cmixx%2Cfurl%2Cmagnolia%2Creddit&style=rotate&publisher=ccd2a158-6cce-4bbc-afa8-1d2dc62fe84c&headerbg=%23c9cad4&linkfg=%230f0fa9&embeds=true"></script>ShareThis 
   
      
     
   AP
   
   
  Dec. 15: Connie Hedegaard addresses the audience during the official opening ceremony of the U.N. Climate Summit in Copenhagen.
   
        
• Wednesday, December 16, 2009    
• The Danish president of the U.N. climate conference, Connie Hedegaard, has resigned and will be replaced by the Danish prime minister as head of the historic talks.
• The change was announced Wednesday as the 193-nation conference enters into a higher phase of negotiations, with world leaders arriving.
• U.N. climate chief Yvo de Boer says Hedegaard will continue to lead informal talks but Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen will now be the formal head of the conference.
• Hedegaard said the move was procedural and that it was appropriate for Loekke Rasmussen to preside with so many heads of state and government taking part.
• and has been criticized by African nations for favoring rich nations in the climate negotiations.
• Hedegaard was appointed climate minister in 2004
• The Associated Press contributed to this report.

8 more annotations...

• There'll be nowhere to run from the new world government
• By Janet Daley
      Published: 7:24PM GMT 19 Dec 2009
•  

    The committee to save the world: Barack Obama, Nicolas Sarkozy, Angela Merkel, Gordon Brown and other leaders at the Copenhagen climate talks  Photo: AFP/GETTY

  • "They decide..You obey"
  Add Sticky Note
• There is scope for debate – and innumerable newspaper quizzes – about who was the most influential public figure of the year, or which the most significant event.
• But there can be little doubt which word won the prize for most important adjective. 2009 was the year in which "global" swept the rest of the political lexicon into obscurity.
• There were "global crises" and "global challenges", the only possible resolution to which lay in "global solutions" necessitating "global agreements".
• Gordon Brown actually suggested something called a "global alliance" in response to climate change. (Would this be an alliance against the Axis of Extra-Terrestrials?)
• Some of this was sheer hokum: when uttered by Gordon Brown, the word "global", as in "global economic crisis", meant: "It's not my fault".
• To the extent that the word had intelligible meaning, it also had political ramifications that were scarcely examined by those who bandied it about with such ponderous self-importance.
• The mere utterance of it was assumed to sweep away any consideration of what was once assumed to be the most basic principle of modern democracy: that elected national governments are responsible to their own people –
• that the right to govern derives from the consent of the electorate.
• The dangerous idea that the democratic accountability of national governments should simply be dispensed with in favour of "global agreements" reached after closed negotiations between world leaders never, so far as I recall, entered into the arena of public discussion.
• Except in the United States, where it became a very contentious talking point, the US still holding firmly to the 18th-century idea that power should lie with the will of the people.
• Nor was much consideration given to the logical conclusion of all this grandiose talk of global consensus as unquestionably desirable:
• if there was no popular choice about approving supranational "legally binding agreements", what would happen to dissenters who did not accept their premises (on climate change, for example) when there was no possibility of fleeing to another country in protest?
• Was this to be regarded as the emergence of world government?
• And would it have powers of policing and enforcement that would supersede the authority of elected national governments?
• In effect, this was the infamous "democratic deficit" of the European Union elevated on to a planetary scale.

  • The "Revised Rome" so many Christians of an Evangelical persuasion have been predicting for decades?
  Add Sticky Note
• And if the EU model is anything to go by, then the agencies of global authority will involve vast tracts of power being handed to unelected officials.
• Forget the relatively petty irritations of Euro‑bureaucracy: welcome to the era of Earth-bureaucracy, when there will be literally nowhere to run.
• But, you may say, however dire the political consequences, surely there is something in this obsession with global dilemmas.
• Economics is now based on a world market, and if the planet really is facing some sort of man-made climate crisis, then that too is a problem that transcends national boundaries.
• Surely, if our problems are universal the solutions must be as well.
• Calling a problem "global" is meant to imply three different things: that it is the result of the actions of people in different countries; that those actions have impacted on the lives of everyone in the world; and that the remedy must involve pretty much identical responses or correctives to those actions. These are separate premises, any of which might be true without the rest of them necessarily being so.
• Well, yes and no.
• The banking crisis certainly had its roots in the international nature of finance, but the way it affected countries and peoples varied considerably according to the differences in their internal arrangements.
• Britain suffered particularly badly because of its addiction to public and private debt, whereas Australia escaped relatively unscathed.
• That a problem is international in its roots does not necessarily imply that the solution must involve the hammering out of a uniform global prescription:
• in fact, given the differences in effects and consequences for individual countries, the attempt to do such hammering might be a huge waste of time and resources that could be put to better use devising national remedies.
• France and Germany seem to have pulled themselves out of recession over the past year (and the US may be about to do so) while Britain has not.
• These variations owe almost nothing to the pompous, overblown attempts to find global solutions: they are largely to do with individual countries, under the pressure of democratic accountability, doing what they decide is best for their own people.
• This is not what Mr Brown calls "narrow self-interest", or "beggar my neighbour" ruthlessness. It is the proper business of elected national leaders to make judgments that are appropriate for the conditions of their own populations.
• It is also right that heads of nations refuse to sign up to "legally binding" global agreements which would disadvantage their own people.
• The resistance of the developing nations to a climate change pact that would deny them the kind of economic growth and mass prosperity to which advanced countries have become accustomed is not mindless selfishness: it is proper regard for the welfare of their own citizens.
• Any action taken in its name must be inherently virtuous, whereas the decisions of individual countries are necessarily "narrow" and self-serving.
• The word "global" has taken on sacred connotations.
• (Never mind that a "global agreement" will almost certainly be disproportionately influenced by the most powerful nations.)
• Nor is our era so utterly unlike previous ones, for all its technological sophistication. We have always needed multilateral agreements, whether about trade, organised crime, border controls, or mutual defence.
• If the impact of our behaviour on humanity at large is much greater or more rapid than ever before then we shall have to find ways of dealing with that which do not involve sacrificing the most enlightened form of government ever devised.
• There is a whiff of totalitarianism about this new theology, in which the risks are described in such cosmic terms that everything else must give way.
• "Globalism" is another form of the internationalism that has been a core belief of the Left:
• a commitment to class rather than country seemed an admirable antidote to the "blood and soil" nationalism that gave rise to fascism.
• The nation-state has never quite recovered from the bad name it acquired in the last century as the progenitor of world war.
• But if it is to be relegated to the dustbin of history then we had better come up with new mechanisms for allowing people to have a say in how they are governed.
• Maybe that could be next year's global challenge.
• Comments: 235
• One of the things that has occurred is that our leaders have gone so far off on a tangent that the people have completely disengaged .
• The only way for the people to re-engage is to dump the lot of them and start again - independent states , independent countries , new systems . Even if this means running parallel states and parallel currencies .
• Watch OLIVER TEMPLE SMITH on You Tube – he’s the only commentator being honest about what’s really going on. And he’s funny.
• Nature cannot be controlled, tamed, or made to fit the whims of human arrogance. This 'world government' will be destroyed by nature herself - the universe is an insurgent against this hubris. Sit back and watch these 'world leaders' scurry like rats as the waves of Life burst the bubble of their illusions...
• to the power hungry tyrants,,, 
   
  control yourself,,, 
   
  not the world,,,
• "its too late now. when all you people now complaining and ranting about a revolution were calling the crazie peopple conspiracy theorists the NWO was busy doing exactly what the crazies were warning you about. Its too late." 
   
  SO TRUE. But, you would be surprised as to how many people refuse to believe what's going on and if I try to start a conversation with them they just say "tsk" and walk away. This "conspiracy theory" will hit the unprepared very hard.
• I suppose the only relevant question for Americans, given their level of individual gun ownership, is will their military side with their government against the electorate, stand down, or join them. I don't see Americans accepting any kind of world order and things are getting crazy over there.
• Its funny reading these comments... even the folks on the right side of the argument are so gullible. to think anyone can rise up against this is just naive. LOL. its too late now. when all you people now complaining and ranting about a revolution were calling the crazie peopple conspiracy theorists the NWO was busy doing exactly what the crazies were warning you about. Its too late.
• The American president is on an ego trip and is so power hungry that it is apparent to us here in the states he is leading his party down the tube next election. He and the algore will be lucky they are not ridden out of town on more than hypothetical rails. The bigger they are the harder they fall. But the major American media will never tell us these two are fools on fools journeys.
• In northern Germany farmers property was pracitcally socialized due to EU-regulations, which prohibits farming and pastures near rivers. In addition migratory bird have to be saved so no shepard is allowed to cross the river banks. EU means EuDSSR. 
  Jean de Venice, Germany
• One world government is a sad lie, only the domain of conspiracy theorists. 
  Marxism is dead, and the plan for worldwide socialism was always a pipe dream, the soviet union certainly didn't care about it. 
  The U.N is impotent, they could not even force a tiny nation to abandon slavery for years, what hope have they of disarming great nations like the U.S?
• One ray of hope is that the US Military is overwhelmingly conservative, and have made a solemn oath, in which they believe, to uphold the US Constitution.
• Power seekers beware! I will not give up my individuality without a horrific fight that leaves me as I want to be and anyone trying to change me ready for the grave.
• What a disheveled bunch they are. In the picture they look like they're ordering lunch from a fast food dive. A true leader would never do this to their people. I am surprised to see a mainstream media outlet using the term "new world order..." So it must be true, all American media never use that term, don't wanna panic anyone.
• Brave Janet writes about the real agenda. 
   
  Good luck folding North America into that world gov't. America is where all the independent people yearning to be free came, for many generations. We cling to our 18th century notion of liberty. The pool of strong individualists vs the rest of the world. Sounds like a rush to the middle ages and then let's see who can get economies re-started. 50 years of rebuilding from nothing, and US has shed it's socialists, and is the last bastion of the western world, with Argentina. Argentina restarts well. The rest of south and central america implode. Most kleptocracies remain feudal without foriegn money. Europe submits to population of islam, so sorry gents. China and Russia carve out what territory they can. Aus may go muslim or chinese.
• See what international communists have wrought. At least we'll be done with the 'political correctness'.
• Those who are examining the pipe dream of global thinking ignore the fact that it ignores all of human nature. I am shocked that more of we behavioral scientists have not stood up against this progressive ignorance.
• Dear Ms. Daley, 
   
  Bravo!! Bravo!! Said like a true American Statesman (of the past!). The only action that will stop that can possibly stop governments from forcing its citizens to kneel before the alter of "Globalization" is out and out rebellion...I'll be dead and gone if and when it occurs, but mark my words...it is the only force that can stop what is now taking place. The arrogance of the intellectual elite surpasses anything I've seen in my 60+ years on this earth...and its been a good earth (and to those already implanted with the Pray-to-government transmitter...Mother Earth can take care of herself).
• I've found this article most interesting. It's strange that while decades of so called conspiracy theory keeps on showing up as more than just theory the press has either been silent or instrumental in bringing about changes, mostly unwanted. If more people subscribed to the U.S. Constitution as their model freedom wouldn't be in question. Only violating the U.S. Constitution and betrayal from within has had any success in moving the U.S. in what most Americans see as the wrong direction. As for a one world government, such things are most likely to lead to civil wars and world wars. Tell not a man that he will do with his life and property what someone else demands by force. Such wannabe dictators are bucking for a fat lip.
• We still have the second amendment!
• For the record, there are approximately 40 million Americans that are going to not sit back and simply accept this. Get ready to rumble...
• It seems obvious that the "climate change" or "global warming" summit was anything but that.  
  Its all about collectivism, isn't it?  
   
  In this article's attached photo I see a roomful of fools. Its embarrassing to see my president sitting there involved with something on one level so meaningless, and on another, so self-destructively malevolent.
• I would rather die fighting this repressive government for my childrens children.
• Does anybody have any idea how many firearms are in the possession of the American people? It is not by accident that the left abhors guns. The useful idiots on the left will be the first to go if a battle against a tyrannical government comes to pass. Luckily those in the armed services lean to the right by a vast majority. The elitist fools who have come to power may soon find history repeating it's self to their detriment.
• Isnt it funny that the Left Wing Liberals that are preaching this Socialist crap all made their Billions in a Capitalist Society ! What is wrong with this picture ?
• Anyone who thinks that America won't stand up to this is totally nuts! This country voted for this kind of crap by electing Obama and the communist majorities in the house and senate. What the heck did you think we would get? Unemployment at 11% dollar devalued, and debt we can never repay! Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it. The idiots who voted for these communists have doomed the United States. What a bunch of idiots!
• This global plan has been molding into place for well over a hundred years. Here is what is going to happen. This global government will take place. You can fight it as much as you want, but the powers in authority will prevail. They will say that we are "saving the planet", but this is a false pretense for a bigger agenda. For everyone's sake, I pray that you find God because when the world collapses in on you, you will have no where else to turn. No gun will save, no constitution, no friend or family member. There will be no where left to go. If you start to feel hopeless, remember that the former things of this world will pass away, and He who is seated on the throne says "behold, I am making all things new." In this find your rest, and peace, and the things of this world cannot affect you. For nothing from this world has life or meaning, all valuables and materials cannot go with you when you pass. So if there is anything you can do, I suggest you pray, and thank God for each peaceful day that he gives. May your peace rest in the Lord.
• read and study daniel chapter 2, gain some perspective.
• Americans were not born into Socialism as Europeans were. Europeans have been beaten into submission. We aren't accepting it without a fight.
• This is all the rage because of Obama. He will soon be gone, he's a one term President. I voted for him and am regretting it wholeheartedly. At the same time all this talk of global this and global that will never get past the US Congress. Thank you to the framers of the US Constitution for Separation of Powers. It's not perfect, but it will make mincemeat of Obama's objectives.  
  Gordon Brown can almost ram anything down the British taxpayers throats because his administration controls the legislature and also, to a lesser extent, the judiciary. Your Prime Minister and his Cabinet are your lawmakers. That would be like the President of the US, the man in charge of the Executive Office, being a Senator or a Representative and enacting laws. Unthinkable.
• "nowhere to run from the new world government" 
   
  Who is going to run? Not me. I'm going to be waging war with the new world government. 
   
  Give me Liberty, or give me Death!
• AUSTIN – Gov. Rick Perry today (April 09, 2009) joined state Rep. Brandon Creighton and sponsors of House Concurrent Resolution (HCR) 50 in support of states’ rights under the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  
   
  “I believe that our federal government has become oppressive in its size, its intrusion into the lives of our citizens, and its interference with the affairs of our state,” Gov. Perry said. “That is why I am here today to express my unwavering support for efforts all across our country to reaffirm the states’ rights affirmed by the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. I believe that returning to the letter and spirit of the U.S. Constitution and its essential 10th Amendment will free our state from undue regulations, and ultimately strengthen our Union.”
• Was anyone else curious that two of the strongest nations were not in this picture? 
   
  Were China and Russia stuck in traffic?
• david scott write on December 20, 2009 at 11:08 PM 
   
  “Although, I personally am so far to the left that even the democrats appear to me to be "right-wing," I consider myself to be a strict constitutionalist. It is my opinion that since its inception there has been an organized and systematic assault by the conservatives in the United States (and in the other industrialized nations) on the civil liberties written into the US Constitution.” 
   
  So it is the Conservatives that are [selectively] suppressing Christianity everywhere it is visible? 
   
  So it is the Conservatives that are trying to curtail gun ownership in every possible way?  
   
  So it is the Conservatives that are trying to suppress talk radio? 
   
  David Scott, please read Liberal Fascism, by Jonah Goldberg, to understand the whence the assaults on the constitution are coming from. 
  
• I think I'll get that 666 tattoo real soon
• We are in the toe nails of the statue of Daniel 2.... Iron and clay don't mix and HIStory is going by the book.
• One world govt? Eventually the American people will wake up and we'll do what we did in 1776..... Read what Jefferson said about tyrrany, there's a growing sense in the US that we should back away from the "warm embrace" of world government. Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty.
• Once we take our head out of the sand, we will see that the elite who own the money, rule the world. And those who don't go along with their plans either follow where the crumbs fall, or starve with those who resist their tyranny. But if you know who has the ultimate power over the elite, then the true source of our substance will reward our faith in him and him alone" Christ"
• God bless the British press. It is the only place an American can go to get objective journalism about American, and yes world politics. Keep up the work, and we will keep reading.
• the new world government will fail for a number of reasons - not the least of which is that my countrymen (americans) will never get on board. It simply is not in our character. Even inching toward European style heath care is causing national revulsion. Obama is forcing the country as far right as it's been...possibly ever...The shift to the Right is breathtaking.
• Orwell as usual, was correct. The world is dividing up into mega regions. We are already fighting over oil - wars that will get worse - China and the West will spend the next 50 years confronting each other. The middle east will confront the end of the oil. Brazil will emerge as a world power confronting the North. Africa will continue to be where we steal resources. Russia will remain...well...Russian. Playing off everyone else for its benefit.  
   
  All these fights go back to energy. They will not be papered over with the back room machinations of soros and friends. As the 200 year "oil" era comes to a close watch for "globalism" to devolve into regionalism then into local splintering... Globalism is not yet a dead man walking...but it is much sicker than it admits.
• One of the most remarkable surveys of the unfolding events leading to the one world rule was presented by Ray Stedman, 27 years ago, and titled, "The Coming Time of Trouble" and can be read or listened to at:  
  http://www.raystedman.org/fateseries/7007.html.
• This is just one in a series, but you will see that the world order will first be composed of rulers from the West, North and East (but not South).
• There is an insurrection coming against this madness. Nothing is going to stop THAT, either. In the US we call it the second amendment.
• The world is infested by villians from an Ayn Rand novel. It is like she traveled in time to 2009 to find the models for the government officials in Atlas Shrugged.
• The US is a sovereign country with its own governing document, the Constitution. 
  We should remain governed by it alone. 
  You all always want to bash America, but then when you get in trouble you want America to come rescue you. 
  We don't want any global BS governing us. 
  Man made globally warming is really just a man made money grab by those like Gore. 
  Most of us realize that global warming exists, as does global cooling, and temperature runs in cycles.

90 more annotations...

• Coefficients Club: Window on the High Cabal?
• H.G. Wells was one of the few socialists who   claimed to see big business, and multinational corporations
    in particular, as the forerunners of a World Socialist State"
• http://educate-yourself.org/cn/coefficientsclub1993.shtml
    Fall 1993
• Reprinted from The Project
    Fall 1993-Winter 93-94, Volume X, Number 4
• The Coefficients Club was organized by Beatrice Webb, the   co-ruler of the Fabian Society with her husband Sidney Webb,
• to bring together   the most powerful movers and shakers of the British Establishment with social   critics and idealists to discuss and chart the future of British Empire   and its relationship to social reform.
• Among other things, the accounts   of its deliberations offered by such luminaries as Bertrand Russell and   H. G. Wells prove beyond any doubt that Fabian Socialism, contrary to surface   impressions that it was the enemy of the British Oligarchy, was one of the   Oligarchy's most prized instruments for world rule.
• Coefficients included:
• Sir Edward Grey,
• Haldane,
• Bertrand Russell,
• Sidney and Beatrice Webb,
• Leo Maxse (who advocated war with Germany already in 1902),
• Clinton Dawkins of the City,
    Carlyon Bellairs of the Navy,
    Pember Reeves,
    W. A. S. Hewins,
    L. S. Amery,
    H. J. Mackinder,
• Lord Robert Cecil,
• Lord Arthur Balfour,
• Michael Sadler,
    Henry Newbolt,
• Lord Alfred Milner,
• John Hugh Smith,
    J. Birchenough of the City,
    Garvin,
    Josiah Wedgwood (the single taxer),
    John Hugh Smith,
    Colonel Repington,
    F. S. Oliver, and
    C. F. G. Masterman.
• The main focus of the Webb's Coefficients appeared to center   on determining the strategy best suited to defending and expanding the "liberal"   British Empire against the increasingly aggressive encroachments of Germany   since it had become unified under the leadership of militarist Prussia in   then recent decades.
• Wells and other idealists argued that "The British   Empire . . . had to be the precursor of a world-state or nothing . . .
• It   was possible for the Germans and Austrians to hold together in their Zollverein   (tariff and trade bloc) because they were placed like a clenched fist in   the centre of Europe.
• Its essential unity must be a unity of great ideas embodied   in the English speech and literature."
• But the British Empire was like an open hand all over   the world. It had no natural economic unity and it could maintain no artificial   economic unity.
• Wells identified Coefficient member Edward Grey   as a promoter of the opposing British strategy of provoking Germany to attack   France, without adequate warning of consequent British intervention, so   that Germany could be laid low sooner than later while the British Navy   was still supreme.
• (Experiment in Autobiography   by H. G. Wells, page 652.)
• Lord Grey was the highly influential Foreign Minister   for Britain in the years preceding WWI who persuaded a reluctant cabinet   that Britain should enter the war because of German violation of Belgian   neutrality.
• (Experiment in Autobiography by H. G. Wells page 659.)
• Though given a respectful hearing behind closed doors in the   Coefficient Club, Wells and his "utopians" were temporarily overruled   by the official British policy of meeting head-on the German threat to the   traditional British orchestrated European "balance of power."
• Britain, by aping the ultra-statist protectionist economics and severe militarism   of Germany and by purposely setting-up entangling alliances, made the carnage   of the Great War (WWI) inevitable.
• This was clear to the disapproving Bertrand   Russell in 1902 and caused him to quit the Coefficients in a huff, informing   Grey (not then in office) that his proposals would lead to war and tyranny.
• From The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell Volume   I, page 230
• "...in 1902, I became a member of a small dining   club called the Coefficients, got up by Sidney Webb for the purpose of   considering political questions from a more or less Imperialist point   of view. It was in this club that I first became acquainted with H. G.   Wells, of whom I had never heard until then. His point of view was more   sympathetic to me than that of any member. Most of the members, in fact,   shocked me profoundly.
• I remember Amery's eyes gleaming with blood-lust   at the thought of a war with America, in which, as he said with exultation,   we should have to arm the whole adult male population.
• One evening Sir   Edward Grey (not then in office) made a speech advocating the policy of   Entente, which had not yet been adopted by the Government. I stated my   objections to the policy very forcibly, and pointed out the likelyhood   of its leading to war, but no one agreed with me, so I resigned from the   Club. It will be seen that I began my opposition to the first war at the   earliest possible moment."
• However, it appears that Wells' "utopian" prescriptions   for a British orchestrated World State were ultimately   adopted with a vengeance once the lessons of WWI and WWII were learned and   the unbearable costs of "official Empire" finally became   clear to even the most stubborn Imperialists.
• It is less clear   if Wells' policies were adopted as a new facade for covert British Imperialism,   a cynical rationalization for constant destabilization congruent with such   covert rule, a sincere attempt to create a World State, or some combination   of the three.
• Two views of Wells' own motivations are also possible.
• When   exposed to the reality and inner workings of the High Cabal of the British   Empire through the Coefficients, did he consciously sell-out his idealistic   belief in socialism and use his familiarity with radical socialist thought   to tailor a cynical propaganda program useful to the "Great Pirates"
• (see the review of Buckminster Fuller's Critical Path in this issue for   the source of this new epithet we shall be applying to the conspiracy)
• upon   whom his literary success depended . . . or was the process of boot licking   subconscious?
• One thing is certain, H.G. Wells was one of the few   socialists who claimed to see big business, and multinational corporations   in particular, as the forerunners of a World Socialist State.

  • Fascism..?? ...or as Mussolini defined Fascism, "Corporatism."
  Add Sticky Note
• In any case, Wells effectively described the policies in   most respects still being effectuated by the Anglo-American Elite.
• Students   of the ruling class/conspiracy need to study Wells' work in detail if they   want to know where we are headed and why.
• The best statement of H. G. Wells'   "utopian" program for moving from World Imperialism to World Government   is his sinister novel, The Shape of Things to Come, though his   Experiment in Autobiography, The Open Conspiracy, and   The New World Order have a lot to offer for the discerning reader   as well.
• We will begin this effort by summarizing a few of the major themes   to be found in The Shape of Things to Come:
• Note: Please turn now to the review of The Shape of Things   to Come in the Recommended Reading Up-dates section of this newsletter so   that the major
    theme of the book, the protracted war from 1940-1966 that allows Wells "Air   Dictatorship" to come to power over a prostrate world, does not have
    to be restated here.
• Please take note of the Wellsian attitude toward "environmentalism"   also.
• Wells came as   close in this area as anywhere else in "giving away his propaganda   game".
• 1. Crime, Gangs, and Civil Disorder.
• Wells   predicted an intractable increase in crime, gang warfare, and civil disorder   until his "modern world state" became a reality.
• On page 143 Wells states, "And then, as the greater community   of the World State began to struggle clumsily and painfully out of traditional   forms, we see police control again out paced by its task. It gives way.
• 'Why,' the student asks, 'was this police organization unable to keep pace   with the new stresses'."
• The obvious answer would be that the Brave   New World Order agenda, or movement for social change, is essentially destructive   and to blame it for the accelerating degeneration of society. But no!
• Wells   spends pages blaming the limitations of individualism, capitalism, religion,   and nationalism for the breakdown and postulating world government as the   "only hope" for order.
• It is clear that this philosophy of blaming   traditional forces, that in spite of their imperfections, have been compatible   with order for centuries for the increasing disorder instead of the new   philosophy remains the successful propaganda line of the New World (dis)Order.
• Wells   actually had some knowledge of the possibility of nuclear power, but made   no mention of it in this book and apparently did not foresee the nuclear   stalemate of 1946-1989 which gave the world some respite from the exhaustion   of perpetual war which he postulated.
• 2. War and International Disorder.
• However, with the dissolution of the   Soviet Union and the examples of Yugoslavia, Somalia, South Africa, India-Pakistan,   etc. in front of us, it is possible that his projected "30 year war"   may run from 1990 to 2016 instead of from 1940 to 1966.

  • And recall, it was the Neocons under George W. Bush who stated almost constantly that the "War On Terror" was to be a long, protracted and decades long war.
  Add Sticky Note
• Wells has a long section on Henry Ford's "Peace Ship",   a public relations device by which the great industrialist tried to bring   WWI to early conclusion.
• While giving no publicity to Ford's central contention   that Wells' mentors, the "Great Pirates" or "International   Bankers" were promoting WWI as part of their destructive program for   "war profits" and a New World Order, Wells shows how Ford's efforts   were doomed to failure
• not because they would be ridiculed unmercifully   by the power of his mentors over the press, but because the evil forces   of individualism and capitalism would force the great industrialist into   war production for a profit.
• In fact, if Ford had not been run off the stage   by the Anglophile Eastern Establishment press, he might have achieved something!
• 3. The Money Question.
• Wells takes a firm   position against the usury and tight money policies of "high finance"   and for the easy money policies of "Social Credit" as promoted   in Britain and the Commonwealth by C. H. Douglas, crack-pot conspiracy theory   advocate
• who Wells actually goes so far as to mention by name!
• Of course, Wells fails to mention that his mentors, the most powerful usurers   of all time who hold the world's credit in their hands and manipulated the   great crash of 1929 which triggered the Great Depression, create boom and   bust cycles to maintain their dominant world position.
• (one of us!)
• One of the   great mysteries of Wells' book is his apparently imaginary author, Gustave   De Windt who wrote Social Nucleation, supposedly in 1942, a book   that solved the final theoretical problems in creating the Modern World   State.
• 4. Education/Social Nucleation.
• Wells states that the book, "was the first exhaustive study   of the psychological laws underlying team play and esprit de corps . . ."
• Wells pictures De Windt's ideas having the
    impact of a Marx, Plato, Darwin, or Adam Smith,
• sweeping away the social   rubbish of the past including family, religion, ethnicity, tribe, and patriotism   and smoothly replacing it with New World Order socialization patterns.
• On a deeper   level, De Windt has created a technology of "macrobe" or "social   organism" building for the "Air Dictatorship.
• There   can be little doubt that De Windtian ideas inform Deweyite Progressive Education   and, more recently, Outcome Based Education.
• One can only wonder   if Wells had a specific psychologist in mind, perhaps the German Wundt who   prefigured behaviorism?
• As we have   mentioned before, ultra social Darwinist Winwood Reade   was Cecil Rhodes' "Ayn Rand and Jules Verne" rolled-up into one.
• 5. The Martyrdom of Man by Winwood Reade.
• On page 108 Wells pays sly tribute to this mentor by mentioning Winwood   Reade, though he claims in his autobiography never to have met Rhodes personally.
• On this page Wells also attempts a lame justification of his mentor's advocacy   of worldwide carnage, disorder, and suffering on the basis of an abundance   of happiness in the future Modern World State.
• Non-lethal "peace   gas" was portrayed as the supreme weapon of the "Airmen".

  • "Chemtrails....??"
  Add Sticky Note
• In fact, the miraculous gas was used to put an end to the influence of the   Pope!

  • SEE: last sentence in this #6 paragraph...i.e. this article was written in 1993 but it is describing "non-lethal" weapons already deployed for use by the U.S. military and civilian law enforcement. Police in Pittsburgh used one of these "non-lethal weapons" against college students Fall of 2008 during one of the big "G" summits in Pittsburgh, PA.
  Add Sticky Note
• 6. Non-Lethal Weapons.
• Though the conspiracy has, of yet, done little of proven value in   this area (ask David Koresh), it is interesting to note that Newsweek of   February 7, 1994 ran an article titled Soon 'Phasers on Stun': A new generation   of nonlethal weapons may help rout mobs, subdue gunmen, even win wars--without   killing the innocent.
• The possible application to UN "Peace-Keeping"   did not go unnoticed.
• One must ask, "What will be the ultimate results of   the Wellsian program for the High Cabal and for the World?"
• First, I continue to be amazed with the continuing success   of the conspiracy in blaming society's increasing problems and crises on   the Wellsian scapegoats: private property rights   and sovereign nationhood.
• As the conspiracy continues its systematic   destruction of existing social structures, allegedly to create Wells' formless   "social magma" it sees as a precondition for its future, no where   in sight, totally unproven, and probably imaginary program of "social   re- nucleation",
• it is, of course, the cause of the current disorder,   not the remedy for it.
• Though many conservatives, libertarians, and other mostly   non-socialist ideologists see this clearly, society as a whole still sees   the conspiracy's "movement for social change" as a case by case   attempt to cure, not as the problem itself!
• Thus, we can safely predict   that severe social disorder will continue and probably intensify world-wide   for the foreseeable future with the mythical Brave New World reconstruction   no where in sight.
• Some like to predict total breakdown and chaos as the   ultimate result of this process, however, all the parasitic conspiracy needs   to do to arrest a too drastic breakdown of its "host" is to periodically   back off on the pressure!
• Order automatically reasserts itself through the   agencies of private capitalism and even national politics, imperfect as   as it is.

  • And I have seen this happen again and again...
  Add Sticky Note
• Thus, like Orwell, we can see the High Cabal's boot stamping forever   on the face of humanity, stubbornly preventing possible evolution toward   peace, justice, and progress as required to maintain its unchallenged, parasitic   position of "Great Pirate".
• We won't hold our breath for the arrival   of Wells utopia, The Modern World State.

93 more annotations...

• The greatest threat of the 21st century: not AGW but Eco-Fascism
• By James Delingpole  Politics  Last updated: January 7th, 2010
• As you freeze your butt off in a winter whose severity the politicised weather forecasters of the Met Office utterly failed to predict, and as you wonder how you can afford gas and electricity bills which have been grotesquely inflated by taxes and legislation designed to “combat global warming”,

• spare a thought for a fellow victim of eco-fascism who’s even worse off than you. In a week or so this poor man could be dead.

   

  
• His name is Peter Spencer, he’s a farmer in New South Wales, and his livelihood has been stolen by the Australian government in the name of – you guessed it – “combatting climate change.”
• That’s why he is now sitting atop that windblown tower you see in the photograph, on sheep farmland rendered useless by eco-legislation,
• starving himself to death in protest at his government’s callous disregard for his property rights.
• This is his 46th day on hunger strike.
• Jo Nova has been following the story closely. Here’s the eco-political background:
• As a part of Australia’s commitment to protect native vegetation and to reduce carbon emissions under the Kyoto protocol, Peter Spencer and thousands of farmers like him, have been subjected to a government imposed ban on land clearing.
• The saved trees are natural carbon sinks worth an estimated $10.8 billion to the government in reduced carbon emissions, should Kevin Rudd’s emissions trading scheme go ahead. But the farmers, who can no longer develop this land have received no compensation.
• He first told his story here in 2006.
• Peter Spencer is among the victims of this legalised theft.
• In recent decades, thousands of farms have become economically marginal and have gone out of business.
• What is not widely known is that this “marginality” has often been the result not of market forces but of government regulation.
• In particular, governments in pursuit of urban green votes have imposed a vast range of devastating new costs on farmers.
• My farm is probably one of the worst affected in Australia, so I can speak about this with some knowledge.
• “Saarahnlee” is at Shannons Flat in NSW. Our northern boundary fence is the southern boundary of the ACT and its Namadgi National Park.
• The farm consists of about 14,000 acres, about 60 per cent of which was cleared before World War II. When I bought it in the 1980s, I had been working overseas to earn the money to buy the place.
• Unfortunately, I was unable to farm it for some time so extensive regrowth occurred. When I returned to Australia to begin to farm, I found that various laws to preserve native vegetation had been enacted in the meantime, and I was unable to “reclear” the land.
• I could have applied for permission to clear, but not only was it unlikely this would have been granted, at that time it would have cost us over $300,000 merely to prepare the necessary farm plan.
• This was because of the number of different ecosystems present due to the 900 metre altitude variation on the property. There would have been no refund if the plan was rejected.
• It should be pointed out that under the just-released regulations (December 1, 2005) this cost would now be paid by the relevant department.
• The result was that I was left with only 800 acres to farm: not nearly enough to live off and a financial catastrophe.
• The bank foreclosed on our mortgage and at the moment we are barely hanging on, thanks to the help of our extended families.
• I protested to the state government and was told nothing could be done.
• Our plight has received extensive publicity and it’s worth putting on the record that I haven’t received one message of sympathy from any environmentalist.
• It appears the Green movement is prepared to destroy the property rights of despised groups such as farmers and devastate their lives in order to achieve its ends.
• The rest of the article shows that Peter Spencer was no whingeing slouch. As Jo Nova reports, he really did try everything before resorting to his final, desperate pass.
• After the land-clearing laws came into effect, Peter paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to set up ponds for trout fishing. But new water laws ended that too (and also without compensation). Tenaciously Peter then set up a fine-wool breeding program, but the bushfires of 2003 (that destroyed 500 homes in Canberra, and native forest near Peter) meant that hundreds of wild dogs were forced out of burnt areas. They over-ran his property, killing hundreds of sheep.
• Spencer gave a moving interview on ABC radio’s Counterpoint programme.
• Every one of my projects is destroyed, every one of my…it’s just disgraceful, Michael, I just feel sick. I was just thinking last night, I can remember going off to court, day after day, sometimes the last eight or nine weeks I would come back, spend one night [unclear], change all my files, back to Sydney again. I spent nearly five weeks there non-stop the last two months. And I’d watch sheep dying in the paddock and I couldn’t go round and shoot them because I had nobody left to help me. I had to let them die on their own, just kicking and struggling because they couldn’t stand up anymore, nothing to feed them with, it was just unbelievable.
• Peter Spencer is an example to us all. I’m not suggesting we all go on hunger strike but we ought surely to emulate his clear-eyed courage in facing up to the greatest menace of our age
• That menace is not, of course, the illusory threat of AGW which our governments so cheerfully use to fleece us and impose control of over us.
• That menace is eco-fascism.
• It’s real, it’s terrifying and it’s time we fought back.
• I agree with Gerald Warner. The only way to get our message across that we’re sick to the craw of Green lies, Green taxes, and Green tyranny is to punish all the mainstream parties – and that very much includes Cameron’s Green Conservatives – at the polls.

35 more annotations...