NWO
Web Address: http://www.diigo.com/list/visigoth/nwoYou are here: Diigo Home > Visigoth Fontaine > Visigoth Fontaine's lists
Visigoth Fontaine
Items:119 | Visits:27
Category:Government & Politics | Tags:authorized-crime, cia, crime, drugs, global-governence, illuminati, lawlessness, money, nwo, officials, opium, us-government
Created:on 2007-10-15 | Updated:on 2008-06-29
Articles and news on the collusion and crime syndicates of the world governments; especially the governments of the US and Great Britain.
-
104Expand
Renegade Eye: Karl Marx's Letter To Abraham Lincoln
Tags: marx, lincoln, civil-war, comments, blog, letter, slavery, revolution, workers, europe, south, government, slave-trade, socialism on 2008-06-29 -All Annotations (22) -About
more fromadvant.blogspot.com
-
Karl Marx's Letter To Abraham Lincoln
-
Address of the International Working Men's Association to Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America
-
Presented to U.S. Ambassador Charles Francis Adams
January 28, 1865 -
Sir:
We congratulate the American people upon your re-election by a large majority. -
If resistance to the Slave Power was the reserved watchword of your first election, the triumphant war cry of your re-election is Death to Slavery.
-
From the commencement of the titanic American strife the workingmen of Europe felt instinctively that the star-spangled banner carried the destiny of their class.
- Some writers have have stated Lincoln was not a moralist in regards to slavery, as much as he was a racist; desirous to keep slavery out of the terrirtories of the U.S. for the sake of the White laborer. There are various ways of looking at Lincoln's approach to these twin issues: slavery and labor. We do know that even in his adult, political life, Black (Negroes) were prohibited from settling in Illinois, free or slave. We do know he was a "corporate" lawyer; working for the high powered and influential railroads of his day. The statements of these writers seem to be substantiated by Lincoln's own actions and the actions of those who admired him but who are less spoken of than are those who have been given the spotlight, emphasizing Lincoln's philanthropy toward Blacks. The "real" Lincoln, as we move farther from the Civil War, is emerging and he is not "the Lincoln" of my early childhood education. Lincoln was, it seems, a "big government, pro corporation, pro-lobby" Republican." How come so few Americans to day know this? For a number of reasons: 1) Intellectual apathy; 2) Intellectually dishonest historians who ought to know better; 3) A Left/Liberal agenda of personal bias that cannot be objective toward either Lincoln's flaws or the South's assets in the same sense that few recall JFK's cardinal failings; choosing rather to amplify sometimes attributes that are contrived out of whole cloth. "Camelot" was not even used while JFK was alove. It was only after he was assasinated. Same with Lincoln. He was not very popular prior to his death. In fact he was thoroughly despised by some (and this in the North) and among his own political party until...UNTIL..his death by assasination. The Lincoln and the John Fitzgerald Kennedy of the apoetheosis do not resembled the men of life or reality.posted by visigoth on 2008-06-29 10:28:59
-
The contest for the territories which opened the dire epopee, was it not to decide whether the virgin soil of immense tracts should be wedded to the labor of the emigrant or prostituted by the tramp of the slave driver?
-
When an oligarchy of 300,000 slaveholders dared to inscribe, for the first time in the annals of the world, "slavery" on the banner of Armed Revolt,
-
when on the very spots where hardly a century ago the idea of one great Democratic Republic had first sprung up,
-
whence the first Declaration of the Rights of Man was issued, and the first impulse given to the European revolution of the eighteenth century;
-
when on those very spots counterrevolution, with systematic thoroughness, gloried in rescinding "the ideas entertained at the time of the formation of the old constitution",
-
and maintained slavery to be "a beneficent institution", indeed, the old solution of the great problem of "the relation of capital to labor", and cynically proclaimed property in man "the cornerstone of the new edifice" —
-
then the working classes of Europe understood at once, even before the fanatic partisanship of the upper classes for the Confederate gentry had given its dismal warning,
-
that the slaveholders' rebellion was to sound the tocsin for a general holy crusade of property against labor,
-
and that for the men of labor, with their hopes for the future, even their past conquests were at stake in that tremendous conflict on the other side of the Atlantic.
-
Everywhere they bore therefore patiently the hardships imposed upon them by the cotton crisis, opposed enthusiastically the proslavery intervention of their betters — and, from most parts of Europe, contributed their quota of blood to the good cause.
-
While the workingmen, the true political powers of the North, allowed slavery to defile their own republic, while before the Negro, mastered and sold without his concurrence, they boasted it the highest prerogative of the white-skinned laborer to sell himself and choose his own master, they were unable to attain the true freedom of labor, or to support their European brethren in their struggle for emancipation; but this barrier to progress has been swept off by the red sea of civil war.
-
The workingmen of Europe feel sure that, as the American War of Independence initiated a new era of ascendancy for the middle class, so the American Antislavery War will do for the working classes.
-
They consider it an earnest of the epoch to come that it fell to the lot of Abraham Lincoln, the single-minded son of the working class, to lead his country through the matchless struggle for the rescue of an enchained race and the reconstruction of a social world. [B]
-
Signed on behalf of the International Workingmen's Association, the Central Council:
-
Longmaid, Worley, Whitlock, Fox, Blackmore, Hartwell, Pidgeon, Lucraft, Weston, Dell, Nieass, Shaw, Lake, Buckley, Osbourne, Howell, Carter, Wheeler, Stainsby, Morgan, Grossmith, Dick, Denoual, Jourdain, Morrissot, Leroux, Bordage, Bocquet, Talandier, Dupont, L.Wolff, Aldovrandi, Lama, Solustri, Nusperli, Eccarius, Wolff, Lessner, Pfander, Lochner, Kaub, Bolleter, Rybczinski, Hansen, Schantzenbach, Smales, Cornelius, Petersen, Otto, Bagnagatti, Setacci;
-
George Odger, President of the Council;
-
P.V. Lubez, Corresponding Secretary for France;
-
Karl Marx, Corresponding Secretary for Germany;
-
G.P. Fontana, Corresponding Secretary for Italy;
-
J.E. Holtorp, Corresponding Secretary for Poland;
-
H.F. Jung, Corresponding Secretary for Switzerland;
-
William R. Cremer, Honorary General Secretary.
-
18 Greek Street, Soho.
-
43 comments
-
Not intending to make any political point but just to add a bit personal background , and that is Marx brother in law and regular visitor to the house and regaler of stories to the girls about the Wild West , Jenny Westphalen brother fought on the side of the Confederacy during the American Civi War .
-
Abraham Lincoln was the most revolutionary President in American history and is undoubtedly one of the greatest leaders of all time.
-
625,000 Americans died ending that peculiar institution of slavery, and you feel good about yourself because a handful of commies sent a letter to Lincoln?
-
FJ: This letter was never meant to atone for the deaths of those who perished in the civil war. It isn't meant to cast the left in a more positive light necessarily either (there are many who would [inaccurately] tell you that Lincoln was a tyrant in the same vein as Stalin or Lenin).
-
The letter indicates that Karl Marx supported the work of Abraham Lincoln because his actions went beyond the "talk" of freedom and equality.
-
Lincoln had to make the difficult decision to wage a war in defense of the union and the principles which held the union together in the first place and Marx, as well as many of the working people in Europe, recognized it as such.
-
Marx was right to support Lincoln's effort to end private slave ownership. The next step in Marx's development would have been to also support freedom from government enslavement. Sadly, he came up short.
-
Read my blog. I'm consistently more critical of Democrats, particularly recently.
Bush and Rove's strategy has hurt the Republicans, for generations to come. My attacks are against Democrats, since they fool more of my base. -
Lincoln acted in much the same way a revolutionary workers state would in the face of an insurrection. The Civil War was undoubtedly a revolutionary war; though many [aptly] recognize that it was waged to preserve liberal revolutionary gains (i.e. the Union), in a broader historical sense it was a war waged to end a form of existing oppression under the current capitalist system.
- The last setence/phrase....does the comment's author have even a working knowledge of the following 3 to 4 decades following the end of the American Civil War? A worker's paradise it was not. In short order, the welfare of the newly freed Negro was dropped and long before Reconstruction ended; the "barons of capitalism" took the helm; not the liberal activist for equality. Not even the working Whites in the North were spared. Google terms such as: "Gilded Age"; "Robber Barons"; "19th Century Industrialists..." and any number of these you will find got their initial foot in the door with Lincoln and the Republican Party's rise to power. I believe too the term "Spoils System" got its inauguration during this era.posted by visigoth on 2008-06-29 10:51:48
-
I read a paper some time back on Marx's civil war analysis that I might repost on my blog sometime. One of the points made is that the South can hardly be considered as having used a slave mode of production at the time of the Civil war, at least not in the same manner Rome or Babylon did. It was more or less an aberration of the capitalist system, albeit one unnatural to the very basis of capitalism.
-
On the same token, I have always found the idea of the Southern states undergoing a rapid period of historical revolution to have merit:
-
Slavery in plantations giving rise to a quasi-feudal system after the war, a la sharecropping, which would later give rise to a capitalist system following the civil rights reforms. Though crude, parts of it add up.
-
Sorry, Ren, but I can assure you that Abraham Lincoln would REJECT Karl Marx's political endorsement w/o reservation. As for his personal sentiments...
-
Legation of the United States
London, 28th January, 1865 -
Sir:
I am directed to inform you that the address of the Central Council of your Association, which was duly transmitted through this Legation to the President of the United [States], has been received by him. -
So far as the sentiments expressed by it are personal, they are accepted by him with a sincere and anxious desire that he may be able to prove himself not unworthy of the confidence which has been recently extended to him by his fellow citizens and by so many of the friends of humanity and progress throughout the world.
-
The Government of the United States has a clear consciousness that its policy neither is nor could be reactionary, but at the same time it adheres to the course which it adopted at the beginning,
-
of abstaining everywhere from propagandism and unlawful intervention.
- WHAT??!! Republicans lie now. Looks like they were liars back then.posted by visigoth on 2008-06-29 10:57:23
-
It strives to do equal and exact justice to all states and to all men and it relies upon the beneficial results of that effort for support at home and for respect and good will throughout the world.
-
Nations do not exist for themselves alone, but to promote the welfare and happiness of mankind by benevolent intercourse and example.
- Yes and this "welfare and happiness of mankind" would be exhibited for the following 3 decades after the Civil War by the wealthy industrialists and tycoons who dominated the American "experiment" at the cost of the White laborer in the North and the freed Blacks in the South. Remember: it was the Republican Party that led the banner of the Union war effort and emerged the heroic victor in 1865. For the longest time following the influence and dominance except for short intervals, was the Republican Party's. The power, influence and money to continue what Lincoln is promoted to having begun, did not continue and this by the same circles who supported his election; reelection and goals.posted by visigoth on 2008-06-29 11:03:34
-
It is in this relation that the United States regard their cause in the present conflict with slavery, maintaining insurgence as the cause of human nature, and they derive new encouragements to persevere from the testimony of the workingmen of Europe that the national attitude is favored with their enlightened approval and earnest sympathies.
-
I have the honor to be, sir, your obedient servant,
Charles Francis Adams -
No one is trying to make the claim that Lincoln was a closet communist and that Marx and Lincoln forged a back-room deal. What is being pointed out is that (1) Marx viewed Lincoln and his handling of the civil war/the slave question in a positive light and (2) many of Lincoln's policies during this time were extremely progressive and revolutionary.
-
There were like 300,000 slaves owners in the US, if I have a good memory, for 35 million people. "Slaves" (I hate this word) were working for cotton and sugar, among other activities. During the XIXth century people in the US were not very used to digest sugar and it could give them a huge buz in their head. (physiology changed since then).
-
If you check out Howard Zinn's take on Lincoln in his chapter on the civil war in A People's History, it sounds like Lincoln was more of a mixed bag politically than this quote from Marx would indicate.
Initially, Marx apparently criticized Lincoln (as did abolitionists like Garrison and Wendell Phillips and Frederick Douglass, I think) for not moving rapidly enough to abolish slavery. But as the quote indicates, by the end of the Civil War Marx's historical evaluation of Lincoln had apparently become much more positive.- My card carrying Socialist Workers Party Cousin and also a Southerner, absolutely adored Lincoln and thought Stalin a hero.posted by visigoth on 2008-06-29 11:09:20
-
Some fact you may not know:
-
* Marx always argued that the successor state to slavery was serfdom.
-
* Slavery is not only a white thing. The Arabs took part to the slave trade as well. Actually the conditions of the black minorities in the Middle-East are far worse than the ones in the western world.
-
* Brazil was also a slave trade destination, but interracial mixing was allowed over there, while it was not allowed in the USA because it was all white and black in the US
-
* In the USA the mentality was to separate slaves and families to make them easier to manage. It's the only country that did that during slave trades.
-
* The servants in the USA also existed, it's rarely mentionned, and they were white. Their status was better than slaves for sure, but they did not have the same status than Americans.
- Most notably: the treatment of the Irish in the North..posted by visigoth on 2008-06-29 11:11:23
-
* The South of the Americas was spanish while the North was English.
- The American North was predominatly English Puritan... The South was (in the southeast) predominately Scotch-Irish. In the Gulf States of the deep South, there was more of a mixture of everything, including French and Spanish but also many "Yankees" came south prior to the Civil War and becoming slave owners themselves, made quite dandy little fortunes.posted by visigoth on 2008-06-29 11:14:11
-
Another thing: in the South of the USA people picked up cotton in the fields until the 80s, yes, 1980!
-
PS: the sugar plantations started around 1640 exactly. It's a very important date, because this period had already started with the colonizations. In Europe, it is the demand of sugar, that switched from the rich to the poor, that boosted slavery, particularly with one ideal spot in the Carribeans. The Dutch dominated the slave trade during this frametime, then the french took over in 1664 (they were buying slaves from Portugal at this time).
-
John Locke - prestigious philosopher - was also an investor in an english slaves' company, and it's during this period that "free trade" in slaves started between different countries, and the slave trade culminated to a major activity around the 1680s (it was representing up to 80% of their incomes) with a big demand in the British North America, and the french had already an ugly futuristic vision of the European Union when they instaured a "European common market im slaves" in the 1700s.
-
PS2: the 1st country that abolished slavery was France, until it was restored under the asshole of Napoleon.
-
PS3: I have nothing to say on Karl Marx. I'll only notice that the colonizations that took place during the XVIIth century left Germany behind among the "great" european nations (they also call them "leaders") until Hitler decided to change the future of Germany.
-
Thus, these are the european colonizations in the rest of the world that pushed Germany to go ahead of the international scene in the 30s. What we usually call "prestige" anytime in history always turns into a nitemare.
-
PS4: Morrocco owned white slaves from Europe during the XVIIth century. It means that slaves and every type of slaves are the representation of the color of skin.
-
Every people in their own skin think they are better than other people of a different color of skin, and I don't think we'll ever be able to get rid of racism on this planet.
-
As my african-american friend Stan told me one day: "The american dream belongs to the 1st person that will screw up the others".
-
The damages sought were in dollars that were to be time valued, so that each dollar that should have been paid to a slave would now be worth over $400,000. There was criticism that such damages would be difficult to prove and that identifying descendants would pose hurdles.
-
The suit against the New York Life Insurance Company, called the Nautilus Insurance Company before the Civil War,
-
involved its practice of insuring the lives of slaves.
-
FleetBoston, which traces its beginnings to Providence Bank, which was chartered in 1791, was under attack because it had been controlled by a slave trader, John Brown, at the time it was founded.
-
Lehman Brothers was charged with having been started by family members who owned slaves.
-
Brown Brothers was accused of making loans to plantation owners and executing judgments against slaves and other assets when loans were defaulted.
-
Various railroads were accused of using slave labor to build their roadbeds.
-
Westpoint Stevens, a textile maker, was claimed to have made rough clothing purchased by slave owners for their slaves. A federal judge in Chicago dismissed the reparations claims.
-
Many major actual US financial companies had ties with the slaves trade. I think we should start boycotting them.
-
Also we have a movement in the US called the Black Panthers v2.0 in case you have problems with the legal US justice system (justice is only blind from one eye). I know there are very active in Houston area, quite different from the 60s movement.
-
Read the book called "capitalism and slavery" from Eric Williams who analysed the links between the "Transatlantic Slave Agreement" (I would call it NASTA). It is indirectly the explosion of slavery that contributed to the industrial revolution in England in London, Liverpool and Bristol.
-
Until this very day, there has not been an apology whatsoever for England because they just don't want to deal with their ancestors. They did it in the USA and France.
-
Blame the Dutch, the whole idea came from them, then the whole village idiots from Europe followed so that they can make money.
-
Scholars tend to agree that:
[ Most plantations were owner-operated and the planters themselves often worked in the fields. Of the total southern white population of 8,099,760 in 1860, only 384,000 owned slaves. Of these, 10,780 owned fifty or more. It was calculated that about 88 per cent of America's slave-owners owned twenty slaves or less. ] -
The number of slaveowners who owned a hundred or more slaves, and in whose hands most of the wealth of the Confederacy was concentrated, was no larger than a thousand.
Yet they got all those other millions to go to war to preserve their way of life. -
Fear not Comrades, our long struggle is almost complete. We simply need put all our efforts into this one last push, and victory will be ours.
Long live the revolutionary vanguard and progressive elements of the Democratic Party!- Yes...YES!! Comrades...! Obama, our great leader, will be victorious! (Americans have a fine set of choices this election 2008. We can continue and even expand the Fascist (Nazism American style) under the Republicans and McCain or OR...we can go Islamo-Marxist with Obama. In either case...Americans of good will who value the America that was..are the loser. Americans in the middle find themslves this time as the Germans of the Wiemar Republic did, caught between Nazi (Republican) Brownshirts and Communist...minus..so far..the street battles.posted by visigoth on 2008-06-29 11:29:00
-
Politiques: Has the UK ever apologized for anything in its history?
-
Fortunately, we no longer have need for crypto-revolutionaries. The real thing is just round the corner. Then we'll see just how much you've managed to really learn, and how much was just smoke.
-
I'm not working lately, so I spend my time reading.
- Well that's one way of bringing "the revolution" to the "Capitalist pigs." Just quit working...posted by visigoth on 2008-06-29 11:31:47
-
I am lucky not to work for the capitalist system. I experienced it, with US corporations, and I just don't understand why they allow these companies to do business. They are a bunch of thieves.
- I have to agree with this observation but I also would add...I worked for a European owned large corporation here in the States and I found more of a rigid, mega-control, super-surveillance..almost oppressive business atmosphere. This may be due to the company being Swiss & German owned (emphasis on the German) but from what I have been reading of late regarding the EU..I think this must now be a European thing. Europe is back in the slave trade as it was in the 16th-17th century. Only this time it is Whitey and the Brothers.posted by visigoth on 2008-06-29 11:35:58
-
So I have to keep myself busy, and I have to look at the Universe to understand the meaning of life.
-
"One day we'll all die, and we are lucky to die, because we know we were born. The only ones who don't die are the ones that were never born (Richard Dawkins)".
- Like..like wow, Dude...That's really heavy!...;>posted by visigoth on 2008-06-29 11:37:19
-
-
16Expand
'Tragedy and Hope': Full 5 Video Interview With Author Carroll Quigley
Tags: videos, carroll-quigley, bill-clinton, georgetown-university, nwo, global-government, bankers, finance on 2008-06-25 -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.infowars.com
-
Rare Carroll Quigley interview in 1974 (Full Interview)
-
Live Leak | June 19, 2008
-
Author of Tragedy and Hope (tragedy is all the people who must suffer and die for the NWO, and the hope is the NEW WORLD ORDER )
-
Professor Quigley was a Globalist, he supported the idea NEW WORLD ORDER and wrote about it, he, unlike the elites, thought the people should know about it.
-
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.
-
This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences…"
-
"The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds’ central banks which were themselves private corporations…"
-
"The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups." Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time (Macmillan Company, 1966,) Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University
-
"The Council on Foreign Relations is the American branch of a society which originated in England … [and] … believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established." Dr. Carroll Quigley
-
"I know of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years in the early 1960s to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies … but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known." — Dr. Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope
-
"As a teenager, I heard John Kennedy’s summons to citizenship. And then, as a student, I heard that call clarified by a professor I had named Carroll Quigley."President Clinton, in his acceptance speech for the Democratic Party’s nomination for president, 16 July 1992
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
57Expand
The New World Nobility
Tags: america, buisnessmen, business, citizens, corporations, democrats, ethics, europe, freedoms, judeao-christian, liberty, monarchy, neocons, new-world, nobility, patriarchy, peasants, power-elite, serfs, subjects, tyrants, wages, work on 2008-03-01 -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.rense.com
-
The New World Nobility
Jim Kirwan
3-1-8 -
Before the Dark Ages most of what was termed Western
Civilization featured The Nobility as the only class of people that really
mattered anywhere. -
These 'privileged' people were of elevated rank supposedly
because of their wealth, their education or just because they were born
into that class. -
This principle followed the Judeo-Christian Ethic to
the extent that human society needed to mirror the paternalistic character
inherent in their view of the Universe. One God equaled one man in charge
and this pattern is repeated all the way down the line to the 'family'
which is the most basic form of that empirical thought. -
In the thousands of years of recorded history, societies
have always had their own hierarchies wherein titles may differ but the
functions inside the societies remain the same. -
This seems to be true
of countries, of religious movements, and remains active in both social
and political thought as well. -
However this is no longer the same world
that elevated that system of special privilege to prominence: and given
our current global crisis-a total re-evaluation of this concept must be
examined. -
It is true that all people are not equal; but it is also
true that society no longer needs to be governed like a flock of sheep
by 'shepherds' whose only interest seems to be how best to use them to
extend their own powers. -
"Flocks" are about the herd mind: people
are about individuals and values that show themselves in that variety
of ways that people have come to view the various worlds that each of
us inhabits. -
This creates several questions:
-
"The New World Nobility" in the 21st Century
-
Why does anyone still "need" the nobility-be
it in the form of entitled-persons, Corporations, religious leaders, Kings
or especially Dictators? -
Before language there was a need. Before the written
word there was still a need: yet with the advances in science and technology
of today, especially with the access enjoyed by the planet, to the internet,
those days of pomp and circumstance supported by celebrity and reinforced
by envy and greed-have really become archaic relics of a time gone by. -
This is especially true of the idea that certain people are by nature
"better" than other people. -
In every major rebellion since the
dawn of time-the first people to be killed were always "The Nobility." -
this should tell us all something very critical about ourselves.
-
Unfortunately,
after-the-revolutions, people always seem to recreate the same failed-formulas
that led them into slavery in the first place. -
The world needs to break
this addiction to the idea of "privileged- classes." -
Freedom is not a privilege it's a birthright
-
Without personal freedom what is living worth?
-
Conditioning to this idea is inherent in the
right of the Nobility-to rule over the lives of others-and this seems
to be the motivating rule that dictates this ancient and outmoded concept. -
Why do
supposedly free people seem to revert to sacrificing that which is most
precious to them, personal freedom & real security just to obtain
some kind of menial job? -
Americans have a secret love-affair with Monarchy (the
one-strong- man idea). -
Since we are a nation of immigrants, we have no
native blood-lines from which to create legitimate 'royalty' from. -
Instead
we have adopted the next-best thing which is the face-less but all powerful
corporations-The Corporatocracy has thus become our stand-in for the Noble
Class. -
To some this may seems far-fetched, but let's look at
the trade- offs that the Corporatocracy currently demands from its wage-
slaves, versus what those long-dead tyrants did to their serfs and ordinary
slaves. -
Whenever anyone takes 'a job' they are not paid for what
is expected of them, because if that were true people would be paid for
a 24-7 day work-week, and not for the pittance of time they actually rent
to their employers. -
Think about it: Employers now demand control over
virtually every aspect of their employee's lives. -
All your habits, known
associates, schooling, family life, even and especially your political
and religious beliefs as well - each and every part of you is subject
to the approval of your employer, on some level and some employers are
much worse than others! -
Those of us who know who we are and what we're worth
will not give- in to that kind of tokenism regardless of the cost. -
The
rest of the 'workforce' for its part seems far too craven, far too willing
to change anything that the all-mighty employer demands of them. -
This
proves that we are no longer free; because far too many of us have capitulated
to the dogmas and doctrines of those faceless entities that virtually
OWN our lives! -
On top of all of that, what these twenty-first century
owners end up paying us, is basically an insult to anything of consequence! -
Do the math - even at the ridiculously low rates that
are actually paid: if you are being paid for only 40 to 60 hours a week
versus 168 hours a week; that's a huge difference! This clearly marks
the difference between what you're renting to the employer, and what
that same employer is demanding, in addition to what you are actually
being paid for. -
This is your skills and your time, versus "giving"
The Corporatocracy total control over your every thought, word and deed. -
Should not this actual difference in the levels of control over your own
life be paid for? Then why not demand it! -
The owners can do this because people buy into the idea
that they must please, in every possible way, the faceless entities that
hired them. -
Free people do NOT do this-because free people have choices
about what they do to earn a living and in how they chose to live their
lives. -
Free people do not capitulate to secret governments,
or to the idea that certain individuals are naturally superior to all
the rest of us. -
In a Republic all governmental functions must be transparent,
just as any 'national-security-considerations' must be extremely limited
with a publicly recognized oversight-control that reports openly to the
public, on every action taken by the SECRET government. -
- However this is not the case today, rather we have returned
to what this 2002 illustration so clearly shows.
- "Halliburton Confirms Concentration Camps Already
Constructed - However this is not the case today, rather we have returned
-
On February 17, 2006, in a speech to the Council on Foreign
Relations, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld spoke of the harm being
done to the country's security, not just by the enemy, but also by what
he called "news informers" who needed to be combated in "a
contest of wills." -
In 2002 Attorney General John Ashcroft announced his
desire to see camps for U.S. citizens deemed to be "enemy combatants." -
A Defense Department document, entitled the "Strategy
for Homeland Defense and Civil Support," has set out a military strategy
against terrorism that envisions an "active, layered defense"
both inside and outside U.S. territory. In the document, the Pentagon
pledges to "transform U.S. military forces to execute homeland defense
missions in the . . . U.S. homeland." The strategy calls for increased
military reconnaissance and surveillance" (1) -
Risk & Sacrifice under the New World Nobility
-
The Noble Class excuse for the need to go to WAR relies
on the idea that they have too much to lose by not launching pre-emptive
attacks. -
While those who 'fight' these modern-day colonial wars of aggression
only need to risk their lives: Which person has more to lose, the Owner
or the slave? -
The middle-class consists of all those people who must either
pay for the wars, or those who will become road-kill in countries around
the planet-wherever the New World Nobility decides that its "interests"
might be threatened. -
Today the treat levels, against the people of the United
States, have reached a fever pitch in both money spent and threats 'identified'
by the Owners. -
"Over 800 concentration camps are reported throughout
the United States, all fully operational and ready to receive U.S. Prisoners
who disagree with the government. -
The concentration camps are all staffed
and manned by full-time guards, however, they are all empty. These camps
are to be operated by FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) when
Martial Law is implemented in the United States (at the stroke of a Presidential
pen and the Attorney General's signature on a warrant). -
The camps have railroad facilities as well as roads leading
to and from the detention facilities, many have airports. Like Auschwitz,
some of the camps have airtight buildings and furnaces. -
The majority
of the camps can each house a population of 20,000 prisoners. -
Currently,
the largest of these facilities is just outside of Fairbanks, Alaska.
The Alaskan facility is a massive "mental health" facility and
can hold approximately 2 million people. -
Following the Halliburton subsidiary KBR (formerly Kellogg
Brown and Root) announcement on Jan. 24 that it had been awarded a $385
million contingency contract by the Department of Homeland Security to
build detention camps, two weeks later, on Feb. 6, Homeland Security Secretary
Michael Chertoff announced that the Fiscal Year 2007 federal budget would
allocate over $400 million to add 6,700 additional detention beds (an
increase of 32 percent over 2006. -
What is interesting in the Homeland
Security plan is that each concrete prison bed costs $60,000 per bed!
Observing these concentration camps and general jail and prison facilities
throughout the U.S., the Homeland Security plan is clearly buffered to
build significantly more than 6,700 additional beds." (2) -
All people must eventually die, the question is how many
of us will come to that finality without actually having lived!
-
-
49Expand
Almost 50,000 Concentration Camps For EU Dissidents
Tags: antichrist, blair, brown, concentration-camps, detention-camps, eastern-europe, end-times, eu, europe, germany, greece, islands, italy, liberty, north-africa, nwo, power-elite, prisons, queen-elizabeth, royals, satan, secession, slaves, southern-europe, spain, turkey, usa on 2008-02-29 -All Annotations (0) -About
more fromwww.rense.com
-
Almost 50,000 Concentration
Camps For EU Dissidents
By Michael James
On the Border of Switzerland
2-28-8 -
"The European Union is a 'monster' that must be
destroyed, the sooner the better. Nothing will happen and no-one will
go to jail. Today you can still do that. But I do not know what the situation
will be tomorrow." Vladimir Bukovsky -
"But fight we will, for we are English and we are
brave, and their losses will unexpectedly great." - MJ -
At a time when the European Union, having fully implemented
every single provision of the Schengen Convention that allows for passport-free
access from within and (in many cases) without the borders of this monstrously
burgeoning Soviet Empire, having concomitantly no problem with permitting
a near unrestricted flood of asylum seekers and economic migrants from
Asia and North Africa, who arrive in vast numbers to seek welfare benefits
and black market jobs, one
-