2 items | 3 visits
sontimalonti 's List: twitter synopses
-
-
- issue with p. 53. hidden/ covered, does not mean deliberate act, not imply power relation, NOT imply inaccessible.
- am gonna be in trouble. i know that crowd. my reverence to Prof H is going to draw mockery. Eek! Evn so. Stmts ARE hidden.
- #knowledgegap structuralism; literary theory; saussure; post-structuralism; speech act theory; linguistics; semiotics; etCETera.
- This *is* a good chapter. #deleuze #foucault #seeing #saying
- in accordance with that (= denial of knowledge that transcends epoch/ history/ strata: it is defined BY the combination of seeing/ saying)
- Strata/ historical formulations have unique combinations of what is seen and what is said; the visible & the articulable. k'ledge defined...
-
- RT @evilitlsquirrel (RT of sorts) the archive is audiovisual. This is the theme, the underlying melody: Saying/ Seeing. Saying. Seeing.
- Warning (p.50): danger of anglo-american, analytical philosophy. Exactly, exactly. We only allow Wittgenstein in *our* little club.
- more keywords: thinking otherwise (surely: Levinas!); also Lacan. Ach, you French, can my German soul take your nominative style?
- TOPOLOGY, knowledge, strata - visible & articulable: sayability, image. Saying/Seeing. Saying. Seeing. I heart Derrida. Miss him, too. Oops
- Deleuze's Foucault, chapter 3 synopsis b4 I tear my hair out. Following Madama @evilitlsquirrel, we're kneedeep in visibility - stmt axis.
- ok, D/ F say T is social b4 it is technical, human b4 material. Hedi: nature of T is nothing technical at all. Are they converging? still c2
- ok, deleuze you ass, at some point the concrete has to give relief to the abstract. Even Heidegger talks about trees, ears, flowers and love
- Ok - if univocity is THE condition of Being, I need to know MUCH more. Cos that's surely MY, ie HEIDI's territory. Yikes, I feel inadequate.
-
-
-
- invagination (NO, no in THAT way).
- GQoD: Does Deleuze get away with the equation TWO=MULTIPLE insofar as TWO is necessary DESCRIPTION of MULTIPLE & insofar as TWO=Always+1?
- Thus Dualism is merely an effect, an "attempt to distribute multiplicity that cannot be contained in a single form".
- Diagram is ”a multiplicity of diffusion which no longer splits into two and is free from any dualizable form”...
- Deleuze's method is a TRIANGULATION: E.G. Statements & Visibilities open up to a Third Dimension: Diagram.
- GOoD: Deleuze, as usual, attempts to argue that his Disjunctive Symmetry is nothing but a multiplicity, in Foucault as elsewhere...
-
- By folding the past/outside into the present/strata we can think the relation of self to self = future/freedom.
- Social change = change in knowledge, power, subjectivity. Always variable. The CONDITIONS of these is what interests F. [and D].
- Not universal, always mutation: Historical problematization: What can I do? What do I know? What am I? = THOUGHT
- The fissure between the two types of knowledge (V&S) is Outside=allows thought=makes the two sides communicate, lets Outside IN.
- Folding is itself also a Memory = the real name of the relation to oneself, affect of self on self. Time as subject is called Memory.
- Subjectivity=4way fold (variable): Material; power; knowledge; outside (expectation of immortality, eternity, salvation, freedom).
- Not independent: Self coded in knowledge & diagrammatized in power. BUT also always a relation to oneself which resists codes and powers.
- =not a projection of the inside but an interiorisation of the outside. Not reproduction of the Same but repetition of the Different.
- IF thought=outside, THEN unthought=inside of the outside: I do not encounter myself on the outside, I find the other in me.
- Formalized relations on strata (Knowledge), diagrammatic relations (Power), relation with Outside (Thought). What about inside/self/subject?
- Tweetdigest of Deleuze's Foucault. Ch5: Foldings, or the Inside of Thought (subjectivation)
-
1 - 2 of 2
20 items/page
List Comments
(0)
List Info