memory may have been skewed by the fact that his image was the only one in color.
wrongly convicted due to the unreliability of human memory
growing interest in the field of neurolaw, which examines the intersection of neuroscience and legal systems, the desire for tools that can objectively assess the accuracy of memories is palpable
The team will convert its research into guides for judges and law schools, detailing what current neuroscience technologies—particularly functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)—can and cannot reveal about the information in a person’s mind.
people tend to be poor judges of the quality of their memories.
brief episodes of memory, like in many criminal cases, poor lighting, passage of time, biased or suggestive questioning all can produce an erroneous memory
fMRI might be better used to determine how—rather than what— a person remembers.
constructive remembering, called “semantic generation,” could lead a witness to remember something that never happened