Intellectually, Frost was the heir of the nineteenth-century romantic individualism exemplified by Emerson and Thoreau. He assumed the lone individual could question and work out his or her own relationships to God and existence—preferably in a natural setting and with a few discrete references to Christianity and Transcendentalism. Unlike Thoreau, however, Frost was never daring enough to challenge the social order boldly in his writings—though he was capable of the conservative cynicism of “Provide, Provide.” Nor was he able to express the romantic affirmations that characterize many of Emerson’s works. The poet, to Emerson, was a seer whose poems should contain truths analogous to religious revelations. Frost’s view of the poet was more modest. In his essay “The Figure a Poem Makes,” which he published as a preface to his Collected Poems, he emphasized that a poem “begins in delight and ends in wisdom....it runs a course of lucky events, and ends in a clarification of life—not necessarily a great clarification, such as sects and cults are founded on, but in a momentary stay against confusion.”