This link has been bookmarked by 133 people . It was first bookmarked on 21 Nov 2016, by Mark Isero.
-
22 Jan 17
-
18 Jan 17
-
11 Jan 17
-
Antonio De Mauro
A study from Stanford University reveals that 82% of middle-schoolers couldn't distinguish between an ad and a real news story on a website.
For them, images and details of the story are more relevant than the source.
A growing number of schools are teaching students to be savvy about choosing and believing information sources, a skill set educators call "media literacy".
Study can be found here:
https://sheg.stanford.edu/upload/V3LessonPlans/Executive%20Summary%2011.21.16.pdfEMEA Italy Society Education Content Family Populism social network research students teens media facebook twitter truth news
-
Teens absorb social media news without considering the source
-
Some 82% of middle-schoolers couldn’t distinguish between an ad labeled “sponsored content” and a real news story on a website, according to a Stanford University study of 7,804 students from middle school through college
-
Many students judged the credibility of newsy tweets based on how much detail they contained or whether a large photo was attached, rather than on the source.
-
A growing number of schools are teaching students to be savvy about choosing and believing various information sources, a skill set educators label “media literacy.”
-
Parents can instill early a healthy skepticism about published reports.
-
By middle school, preteens are online 7-1/2 hours a day outside of school, research shows.
-
By age 18, 88% of young adults regularly get news from Facebook and other social media, according to a 2015 study of 1,045 adults ages 18 to 34 by the Media Insight Project.
-
Also, explain to teens that a top ranking on Google doesn’t mean an article is trustworthy.
-
-
08 Jan 17
-
06 Jan 17
-
03 Jan 17
-
Some 82% of middle-schoolers couldn’t distinguish between an ad labeled “sponsored content” and a real news story on a website
-
two out of three middle-schoolers couldn’t see any valid reason to mistrust a post
-
nearly four in 10 high-school students believed, based on the headline, that a photo of deformed daisies on a photo-sharing site provided strong evidence of toxic conditions near the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan
-
-
deceptive advertising, satirical websites and misleading partisan posts and articles
-
media literacy
-
fewer schools now have librarians, who traditionally taught research skills
-
media literacy has slipped to the margins
-
Many students multitask by texting, reading and watching video at once, hampering the concentration needed to question content and think deeply
-
By age 18, 88% of young adults regularly get news from Facebook and other social media
-
“echo chamber effect,”
-
“lateral reading”
-
Students should learn to evaluate sources’ reliability based on whether they’re named, independent and well-informed or authoritative
-
Posts should cite multiple sources, and the information should be verifiable elsewhere
-
-
22 Dec 16Michele Day
"Teens absorb social media news without considering the source; parents can teach research skills and skepticism"
-
19 Dec 16
-
16 Dec 16
-
15 Dec 16
-
13 Dec 16
-
12 Dec 16
-
09 Dec 16
-
08 Dec 16
-
06 Dec 16
-
03 Dec 16
-
01 Dec 16
-
30 Nov 16
-
Many students judged the credibility of newsy tweets based on how much detail they contained or whether a large photo was attached, rather than on the source.
-
y middle school, preteens are online 7-1/2 hours a day outside of school, research shows. Many students multitask by texting, reading and watching video at once, hampering the concentration needed to question content and think deeply,
-
Teens also can learn basic skills used by professional fact-checkers, Dr. Wineburg says. Rather than trusting the “about” section of a website to learn about it, teach them “lateral reading”—leaving the website almost immediately after landing on it and research the organization or author.
-
top ranking on Google doesn’t mean an article is trustworthy.
-
-
29 Nov 16Amber Jones
Most students don’t know when news is fake, Stanford study finds https://t.co/dXPNpJckRC via @WSJ
-
28 Nov 16
-
27 Nov 16
-
26 Nov 16Jeroen Clemens
You read this already - Right? Most students don’t know when news is fake, Stanford study finds https://t.co/n5hLnwcFIj via @WSJ #rvsed
-
-
Sam Wineburg
-
“lateral reading”—leaving the website almost immediately after landing on it and research the organization or author.
-
-
Eric Brunvand
One of the many skills we need to focus on and TEACH students...we can't just say it's important.
https://t.co/Lp0je4kjpA -
25 Nov 16
-
24 Nov 16Erich Feldmeier
"Some 82% of middle-schoolers couldn’t distinguish between an ad labeled “sponsored content” and a real news story on a website, according to a Stanford University study of 7,804 students from middle school through college. The study, set for release Tuesday, is the biggest so far on how teens evaluate information they find online. Many students judged the credibility of newsy tweets based on how much detail they contained or whether a large photo was attached, rather than on the source"
education science neurobiology system1 spatzenhirn behaviour knowledge groupthink socialmedia commonsense biology
-
Heather Ross
"Teens absorb social media news without considering the source; parents can teach research skills and skepticism"
digital citizenship Digital Literacy information literacy propaganda
-
Lorena Swetnam
Most students don't know when news is fake, Stanford study finds (I wonder how adults compare?) https://t.co/tjZ7K0AyWD
-
Paul Jaeger
To avoid another election disaster, all kids must
be taught to think critically: ask questions and weigh evidence https://t.co/DC2K3wLnaz -
Renee Hawkins
Most students don’t know when news is fake, Stanford study finds https://t.co/E7UvATkxAn via @WSJ
Most students don’t know when news is fake, Stanford study finds https://t.co/ZdaZIystYo via @WSJ -
23 Nov 16
-
Jane Lofton
Middle School librarians needed! Most students don’t know when news is fake, Stanford study finds https://t.co/sU6vKm2C74 via @WSJ
-
Alice Barr
"Most Students Don’t Know When News Is Fake, Stanford Study Finds"
-
Melissa Enderle
Technology literacy goes so much deeper. https://t.co/V7wgzfK2iJ
-
lecruz
Восприятие информации школьниками и студентами колледжей США
Опубликовано исследование Стендфордского университета, в котором изучалось восприятие новостей и другой онлайн-информации 7804 школьников старших классов и студентов колледжей (students from middle school through college).
— 82% не различают спонсорские посты и обычные материалы редакций;
— ~70% доверяют тексту, написанному от имени CEO банка;
— ~40% считают левую фотографию разрушений достаточным доказательством утечки радиации на Фукусиме, несмотря на отсутствие какого-либо источника;
— Многие (не указана цифра) считают признаком правдивости большое число деталей и фото, а не указание на источник;
— При этом подростки проводят онлайн в среднем 7,5 часов в день вне школы.
По данным другого исследования 2015 года, 18-летние американцы 88% новостей читают в Фэйсбуке и других социальных медиа.usa news исследование аудитории опрос доверие к рекламе social
-
Stephanie Cheney
To avoid another election disaster, all kids must
be taught to think critically: ask questions and weigh evidence https://t.co/DC2K3wLnaz -
Josephine Dorado
November 27, 2016 at 08:34PM
IFTTT bitly literacy media literacy youth education fakenews journalism hoax propaganda
-
Brandon Hoover
Most Students Don’t Know When News Is Fake, Stanford Study Finds https://t.co/b9sVzdTicP #socialmedia #edtech #coetail
-
22 Nov 16
-
Toby Price
To avoid another election disaster, all kids must
be taught to think critically: ask questions and weigh evidence https://t.co/DC2K3wLnaz -
Doug Peterson
Most Students Don’t Know When News Is Fake, Stanford Study Finds - WSJ https://t.co/BYi08Iy1Rq
Found with https://t.co/7D97BqAXbS
Most Students Don’t Know When News Is Fake, Stanford Study Finds - WSJ https://t.co/BYi08Iy1Rq
Found with https://t.co/7D97BqAXbS
— Doug Peterson (@dougpete) November 22, 2016 -
Joyce Lawton
A study of middle-school to college-age students found most absorb social media news without considering the source. How parents can teach research skills and skepticism.
-
Neil Mehta
"nearly four in 10 high-school students believed, based on the headline, that a photo of deformed daisies on a photo-sharing site provided strong evidence of toxic conditions near the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan, even though no source or location was given for the photo."
-
Lenessa Keehn
Most Students Don’t Know When News is Fake, Stanford Study Finds - WSJ https://t.co/V0IAbpmq4f
-
John Evans
"Preteens and teens may appear dazzlingly fluent, flitting among social-media sites, uploading selfies and texting friends. But they’re often clueless about evaluating the accuracy and trustworthiness of what they find.
Some 82% of middle-schoolers couldn’t distinguish between an ad labeled “sponsored content” and a real news story on a website, according to a Stanford University study of 7,804 students from middle school through college. The study, set for release Tuesday, is the biggest so far on how teens evaluate information they find online. Many students judged the credibility of newsy tweets based on how much detail they contained or whether a large photo was attached, rather than on the source." -
Muzaffaruddin Alvi
via All News on 'The Twitter Times: Muzaffar69/corpgov' http://ift.tt/1MszafE
#CorpGov All News on 'The Twitter Times: Muzaffar69_corpgov'
-
-
they’re often clueless about evaluating the accuracy and trustworthiness of what they find.
-
Many students judged the credibility of newsy tweets based on how much detail they contained or whether a large photo was attached, rather than on the source.
-
-
media literacy.
-
parents pick up on their children’s interests and help them to find and evaluate news on the topic online
-
a healthy skepticism
-
hampering the concentration needed to question content and think deeply
-
By age 18, 88%
-
Media Insight Project.
-
feed users news items similar to those they’ve read before
-
let them see you reading news from a variety of sources
-
Teens also can learn basic skills used by professional fact-checkers,
-
“lateral reading”
-
research the organization or author.
-
a top ranking on Google doesn’t mean an article is trustworthy
-
The rankings are based on several factors, including popularity.
-
Posts should cite multiple sources, and the information should be verifiable elsewhere, he says.
-
“Follow their train of thought,” inviting them to explain the steps that led them to the website
-
If their reasoning reveals faulty assumptions or a lack of skepticism, “use that as a teachable moment,” he says.
-
noticing the sources of information
-
express their views and respect each other’s opinions if they disagree
-
-
-
Some 82% of middle-schoolers couldn’t distinguish between an ad labeled “sponsored content” and a real news story on a website, according to a Stanford University study of 7,804 students from middle school through college.
-
the source.
-
And nearly four in 10 high-school students believed, based on the headline, that a photo of deformed daisies on a photo-sharing site provided strong evidence of toxic conditions near the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan, even though no source or location was given for the photo.
-
Teens also can learn basic skills used by professional fact-checkers, Dr. Wineburg says. Rather than trusting the “about” section of a website to learn about it, teach them “lateral reading”—leaving the website almost immediately after landing on it and research the organization or author.
-
top ranking on Google doesn’t mean an article is trustworthy.
-
based on whether they’re named, independent and well-informed or authoritative, says <!-- -->Jonathan Anzalone,<!-- --> assistant director of the Center for News Literacy at Stony Brook University in New York. Posts should cite multiple sources, and the information should be verifiable elsewhere, he says.
-
a habit of noticing the sources of information they read online and learning about their viewpoint or goals.
-
differences among news sources, how to research authors and to be more skeptical when looking at posts on social media
-
-
Francois Guite
Some 82% of middle-schoolers couldn’t distinguish between an ad labeled “sponsored content” and a real news story on a website, according to a Stanford University study of 7,804 students from middle school through college.
research survey statistics teens United States fake news validity media critical thinking education
-
21 Nov 16
-
Some 82% of middle schoolers couldn’t distinguish between an ad labeled “sponsored content” and a real news story on a website, according to a Stanford University study of 7,804 students from middle school through college. The study, set for release Tuesday, is the biggest so far on how teens evaluate information they find online. Many students judged the credibility of newsy tweets based on how much detail they contained or whether a large photo was attached, rather than on the source.
-
A growing number of schools are teaching students to be savvy about choosing and believing various information sources, a skill set educators label “media literacy.”
-
And media literacy has slipped to the margins in many classrooms, to make room for increased instruction in basic reading and math skills.
-
By middle school, preteens are online 7-1/2 hours a day outside of school, research shows. Many students multitask by texting, reading and watching video at once, hampering the concentration needed to question content and think deeply, says <!-- -->Yalda T. Uhls,<!-- --> a research psychologist at the Children’s Digital Media Center at the University of California, Los Angeles.
-
By age 18, 88% of young adults regularly get news from Facebook and other social media, according to a 2015 study of 1,045 adults ages 18 to 34 by the Media Insight Project.
-
Teens also can learn basic skills used by professional fact-checkers, Dr. Wineburg says. Rather than trusting the “about” section of a website to learn about it, teach them “lateral reading”—leaving the website almost immediately after landing on it and research the organization or author.
-
Students should learn to evaluate sources’ reliability based on whether they’re named, independent and well-informed or authoritative,
-
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.