Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business - The Diigo Meta page

• 31 Oct 09
  

  Al Wong
  • His boss at the bottle cap company, meanwhile, had just one piece of advice: Invent something people use and throw away.
• 30 Sep 09
  

  Kathryn Hautanen

  giftgiving

• 22 Sep 09
  

  songplacements

  Have you embraced the free.

• 13 Sep 09
  

  Johannes Baeck

  economy free business

• 09 Jun 09
  

  Graham Perrin

  Diigo 46225 2009

  • give them away with new deposits ("shave and save" campaigns). Razors were bundled with everything from Wrigley's gum to packets of coffee, tea, spices, and marshmallows. The freebies helped to sell those products, but the tactic helped Gillette even more
  • the idea that you can make money by giving something away is no longer radical
  • 2 more annotations...
  • • $0.00 Is the Future
    • the market price of online storage, at least for email, has now fallen to zero (see "Webmail Windfall")
• 07 Jun 09
  

  Alex Popescu

  biz

  • this business model is now the foundation of entire industries: Give away the cell phone, sell the monthly plan; make the videogame console cheap and sell expensive games; install fancy coffeemakers in offices at no charge so you can sell managers expensive coffee sachets.
  • Thanks to Gillette, the idea that you can make money by giving something away is no longer radical.
  • 5 more annotations...
  • • But until recently, practically everything "free" was really just the result of what economists would call a cross-subsidy: You'd get one thing free if you bought another, or you'd get a product free only if you paid for a service.
    • Last year, Yahoo announced that Yahoo Mail, its free webmail service, would provide unlimited storage. Just in case that wasn't totally clear, that's "unlimited" as in "infinite." So the market price of online storage, at least for email, has now fallen to zero
    • there are only two numbers on the Internet: infinity and zero. The first, at least as it applied to stock market valuations, proved false. But the second is alive and well.
    • The Web has become the land of the free.
    • From the consumer's perspective, though, there is a huge difference between cheap and free. Give a product away and it can go viral. Charge a single cent for it and you're in an entirely different business, one of clawing and scratching for every customer. The psychology of "free" is powerful indeed, as any marketer will tell you.
• 27 Apr 09
  

  Greg Vogelsperger
• 23 Apr 09
  

  arnie Grossblatt

  This article is over a year old, and soon to be updated by Chris Anderson's book of the same title, but it's still well worth the read.

  publishing business model pricing

• 01 Apr 09
  

  Jack Creamation

  Economics economy strategy

• 12 Mar 09
  

  Geneva Henry

  economic publishing technical infrastructure licensing licensing_fees

• 30 Jan 09
  

  joe matthew

  King Gillette's 1895 disposable blades made good freebies to help sell other products. Companies use his business model today to create demand for their goods: Give away the cell phone, sell the monthly plan; make the videogame console cheap and sell expensive games. Now, the underlying technologies that power the web are making "freeconomics" a full-fledged economy.

• 27 Jan 09
  

  Mark Harding

  business

• 26 Jan 09
  

  Jessen Felix

  free

• 14 Dec 08
  

  Dorota Tylus

  web2.0 technology online internet free culture newmedia_studies

  • The freebies helped to sell those products, but the tactic helped Gillette even more. By giving away the razors, which were useless by themselves, he was creating demand for disposable blades.
  • The new model is based not on cross-subsidies — the shifting of costs from one product to another — but on the fact that the cost of products themselves is falling fast. It's as if the price of steel had dropped so close to zero that King Gillette could give away both razor and blade, and make his money on something else entirely
  • 4 more annotations...
  • • The first is the extension of King Gillette's cross-subsidy to more and more industries.
    • The second trend is simply that anything that touches digital networks quickly feels the effect of falling costs.
    • what Mead and Kay understood was that the transistors in them — the atomic units of computation — would become so numerous that on an individual basis, they'd be close enough to costless that they might as well be free.
    • A typical online site follows the 1 Percent Rule — 1 percent of users support all the rest. In the freemium model, that means for every user who pays for the premium version of the site, 99 others get the basic free version.
• 12 Dec 08
  

  whatevernevermind Barrish

  I think I've actually bookmarked this before, but it's a great article to check out.

  economics strategy web article trends economy

• 08 Dec 08
  

  Harry Bushman

  Free!
  

• 07 Dec 08
  

  alex weinstein

  imported Bookmarks googlebookmark tech free business economics marketing wired trends strategy

• 01 Dec 08
  

  C. S. Soares
  • At the age of 40, King Gillette was a frustrated inventor
  • It was 1895
  • 8 more annotations...
  • • He blamed the evils of market competition
    • previous year he had published a book, The Human Drift, which argued that all industry should be taken over by a single corporation owned by the public and that millions of Americans should live in a giant city called Metropolis powered by Niagara Falls
    • Invent something people use and throw away
    • One day, while he was shaving
    • the idea came to him.
    • What if the blade could be made of a thin metal strip?
    • In its first year, 1903, Gillette sold a total of 51 razors and 168 blades
    • Over the next two decades, he tried every marketing gimmick he could think of
• 30 Nov 08
  

  A D

  Artículo basado en el nuevo libro de Chris Anderson

  trends longtail free marketing business web2.0

• 26 Nov 08
  

  Brooks Cole

  holodev articles luminaries tech longtail FREE diigo

• 08 Nov 08
  

  carlos r

  web economics strategy economy

  • What does this mean for the notion of free?

  • 
    

    For good reason: It's now clear that practically everything Web technology touches starts down the path to gratis, at least as far as we consumers are concerned. Storage now joins bandwidth (YouTube: free) and processing power (Google: free) in the race to the bottom. Basic economics tells us that in a competitive market, price falls to the marginal cost. There's never been a more competitive market than the Internet, and every day the marginal cost of digital information comes closer to nothing

  • 19 more annotations...

  • • The Web has become the land of the free.

      
      

      The result is that we now have not one but two trends driving the spread of free business models across the economy. The first is the extension of King Gillette's cross-subsidy to more and more industries. Technology is giving companies greater flexibility in how broadly they can define their markets, allowing them more freedom to give away products or services to one set of customers while selling to another set.

    • The second trend is simply that anything that touches digital networks quickly feels the effect of falling costs. There's nothing new about technology's deflationary force, but what is new is the speed at which industries of all sorts are becoming digital businesses and thus able to exploit those economics.
    • And here was Mead, telling programmers to embrace waste. They scratched their heads — how do you waste computer power? It took Alan Kay, an engineer working at Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center, to show them. Rather than conserve transistors for core processing functions, he developed a computer concept — the Dynabook — that would frivolously deploy silicon to do silly things: draw icons, windows, pointers, and even animations on the screen. The purpose of this profligate eye candy? Ease of use for regular folks,
    • o follow the money, you have to shift from a basic view of a market as a matching of two parties — buyers and sellers — to a broader sense of an ecosystem with many parties, only some of which exchange cash.
    • The most common of the economies built around free is the three-party system. Here a third party pays to participate in a market created by a free exchange between the first two parties.
    • In the traditional media model, a publisher provides a product free (or nearly free) to consumers, and advertisers pay to ride along
    • In a sense, what the Web represents is the extension of the media business model to industries of all sorts.
    • but the priceless economy can be broken down into six broad categories:
    • "Freemium"
      
      What's free: Web software and services, some content. Free to whom: users of the basic version.
    • This term, coined by venture capitalist Fred Wilson, is the basis of the subscription model of media and is one of the most common Web business models. It can take a range of forms: varying tiers of content, from free to expensive, or a premium "pro" version of some site or software with more features than the free version (think Flickr and the $25-a-year Flickr Pro).
    • But for digital products, this ratio of free to paid is reversed. A typical online site follows the 1 Percent Rule — 1 percent of users support all the rest. In the freemium model, that means for every user who pays for the premium version of the site, 99 others get the basic free version. The reason this works is that the cost of serving the 99 percent is close enough to zero to call it nothing.
    • Advertising
      
      What's free: content, services, software, and more. Free to whom: everyone.
    • Cross-subsidies
      
      What's free: any product that entices you to pay for something else. Free to whom: everyone willing to pay eventually, one way or another.
    • In any package of products and services, from banking to mobile calling plans, the price of each individual component is often determined by psychology, not cost. Your cell phone company may not make money on your monthly minutes — it keeps that fee low because it knows that's the first thing you look at when picking a carrier — but your monthly voicemail fee is pure profit.

    • Zero marginal cost
      
      What's free: things that can be distributed without an appreciable cost to anyone. Free to whom: everyone.

      
      

      This describes nothing so well as online music. Between digital reproduction and peer-to-peer distribution, the real cost of distributing music has truly hit bottom. This is a case where the product has become free because of sheer economic gravity, with or without a business model.

    • · Labor exchange
      
      What's free: Web sites and services. Free to whom: all users, since the act of using these sites and services actually creates something of value.

      
      

      You can get free porn if you solve a few captchas, those scrambled text boxes used to block bots. What you're actually doing is giving answers to a bot used by spammers to gain access to other sites

    • Gift economy
      
      What's free: the whole enchilada, be it open source software or user-generated content. Free to whom: everyone.

    • 
      

      It does. The word is externalities, a concept that holds that money is not the only scarcity in the world. Chief among the others are your time and respect, two factors that we've always known about but have only recently been able to measure properly. The "attention economy" and "reputation economy" are too fuzzy to merit an academic department, but there's something real at the heart of both. Thanks to Google, we now have a handy way to convert from reputation (PageRank) to attention (traffic) to money (ads). Anything you can consistently convert to cash is a form of currency itself, and Google plays the role of central banker for these new economies.

    • There is, presumably, a limited supply of reputation and attention in the world at any point in time. These are the new scarcities — and the world of free exists mostly to acquire these valuable assets for the sake of a business model to be identified later. Free shifts the economy from a focus on only that which can be quantified in dollars and cents to a more realistic accounting of all the things we truly value today
• 18 Oct 08
  

  Clay Burell

  A good overview of how web-based "free" is changing business dogma.

  economics web2.0 publishing

• 18 Sep 08
  

  Nele Noppe

  business internet

  • Basic economics tells us that in a competitive market, price falls to the marginal cost. There's never been a more competitive market than the Internet, and every day the marginal cost of digital information comes closer to nothing.
  • The moment a company's primary expenses become things based in silicon, free becomes not just an option but the inevitable destination.
  • 20 more annotations...

  • • 
      

      What Mead understood is that a psychological switch should flip as things head toward zero. Even though they may never become entirely free, as the price drops there is great advantage to be had in treating them as if they were free.

    • This difference between cheap and free is what venture capitalist Josh Kopelman calls the "penny gap." People think demand is elastic and that volume falls in a straight line as price rises, but the truth is that zero is one market and any other price is another. In many cases, that's the difference between a great market and none at all.
    • The huge psychological gap between "almost zero" and "zero" is why micropayments failed.
    • Just because products are free doesn't mean that someone, somewhere, isn't making huge gobs of money.
    • To follow the money, you have to shift from a basic view of a market as a matching of two parties — buyers and sellers — to a broader sense of an ecosystem with many parties, only some of which exchange cash.
    • The most common of the economies built around free is the three-party system. Here a third party pays to participate in a market created by a free exchange between the first two parties. Sound complicated? You're probably experiencing it right now. It's the basis of virtually all media.
    • This is not simply the notion that advertising will pay for everything. There are dozens of ways that media companies make money around free content, from selling information about consumers to brand licensing, "value-added" subscriptions, and direct ecommerce
    • the opportunities to adopt a free business model of some sort have never been greater. But which one? And how many are there? Probably hundreds, but the priceless economy can be broken down into six broad categories:
    • "Freemium"
      
      What's free: Web software and services, some content. Free to whom: users of the basic version.
    • A typical online site follows the 1 Percent Rule — 1 percent of users support all the rest.
    • · Advertising
      
      What's free: content, services, software, and more. Free to whom: everyone.
    • · Cross-subsidies
      
      What's free: any product that entices you to pay for something else. Free to whom: everyone willing to pay eventually, one way or another.
    • Expensive wine subsidizes food in a restaurant
    • omnipresence in the urban soundscape means that it gets huge crowds to its rave/dj/concert events. Free music is just publicity for a far more lucrative tour business. Nobody thinks of this as piracy.
    • · Zero marginal cost
      
      What's free: things that can be distributed without an appreciable cost to anyone. Free to whom: everyone.
    • · Labor exchange
      
      What's free: Web sites and services. Free to whom: all users, since the act of using these sites and services actually creates something of value.

    • 
      
      

      · Gift economy
      
      What's free: the whole enchilada, be it open source software or user-generated content. Free to whom: everyone.

    • It does. The word is externalities, a concept that holds that money is not the only scarcity in the world. Chief among the others are your time and respect, two factors that we've always known about but have only recently been able to measure properly. The "attention economy" and "reputation economy"
    • Thanks to Google, we now have a handy way to convert from reputation (PageRank) to attention (traffic) to money (ads). Anything you can consistently convert to cash is a form of currency itself, and Google plays the role of central banker for these new economies.
    • Free shifts the economy from a focus on only that which can be quantified in dollars and cents to a more realistic accounting of all the things we truly value today.
• 09 Sep 08
  

  Kevin Krejci

  free advertising innovation internet web

• 05 Sep 08
  

  Doobii X
  • practically everything "free" was really just the result of what economists would call a cross-subsidy: You'd get one thing free if you bought another, or you'd get a product free only if you paid for a service.
  • In 2007 The New York Times went free; this year, so will much of The Wall Street Journal. (The remaining fee-based parts, new owner Rupert Murdoch announced, will be "really special ... and, sorry to tell you, probably more expensive." This calls to mind one version of Stewart Brand's original aphorism from 1984: "Information wants to be free. Information also wants to be expensive ... That tension will not go away.")
  • 13 more annotations...
  • • the 20th-century shift from Newtonian to quantum machines. We're still just beginning to exploit atomic-scale effects in revolutionary new materials — semiconductors (processing power), ferromagnetic compounds (storage), and fiber optics (bandwidth).
    • And the stunning thing is that nobody was surprised; many had assumed infinite free storage was already the case.
    • It's now clear that practically everything Web technology touches starts down the path to gratis
    • Storage now joins bandwidth (YouTube: free) and processing power (Google: free) in the race to the bottom.
    • There's never been a more competitive market than the Internet, and every day the marginal cost of digital information comes closer to nothing.
    • The moment a company's primary expenses become things based in silicon, free becomes not just an option but the inevitable destination.
    • The huge psychological gap between "almost zero" and "zero" is why micropayments failed.
    • Traditionalists wring their hands about the "vaporization of value" and "demonetization" of entire industries.
    • To follow the money, you have to shift from a basic view of a market as a matching of two parties — buyers and sellers — to a broader sense of an ecosystem with many parties, only some of which exchange cash.
    • They're not selling papers and magazines to readers, they're selling readers to advertisers. It's a three-way market.
    • A typical online site follows the 1 Percent Rule — 1 percent of users support all the rest. In the freemium model
    • Broadcast commercials and print display ads have given way to a blizzard of new Web-based ad formats: Yahoo's pay-per-pageview banners, Google's pay-per-click text ads, Amazon's pay-per-transaction "affiliate ads," and site sponsorships were just the start. Then came the next wave: paid inclusion in search results, paid listing in information services, and lead generation, where a third party pays for the names of people interested in a certain subject. Now companies are trying everything from product placement (PayPerPost) to pay-per-connection on social networks like Facebook. All of these approaches are based on the principle that free offerings build audiences with distinct interests and expressed needs that advertisers will pay to reach.
    • Web sites and services. Free to whom: all users, since the act of using these sites and services actually creates something of value.
• 02 Sep 08
  

  mikeem em

  Milton Friedman himself reminded us time and time again that "there's no such thing as a free lunch.
  
  "But Friedman was wrong in two ways. First, a free lunch doesn't necessarily mean the food is being given away or that you'll pay for it later — it could just mean someone else is picking up the tab. Second, in the digital realm, as we've seen, the main feedstocks of the information economy — storage, processing power, and bandwidth — are getting cheaper by the day. Two of the main scarcity functions of traditional economics — the marginal costs of manufacturing and distribution — are rushing headlong to zip. It's as if the restaurant suddenly didn't have to pay any food or labor costs for that lunch.
  
  Surely economics has something to say about that?

  free wired economics article economy chris anderson

• 22 Aug 08
  

  Steve Kinney

  economics strategy economy opensource web entrepreneurship entrepreneur

• 

  Allison Kipta

  "You know this freaky land of free as the Web. A decade and a half into the great online experiment, the last debates over free versus pay online are ending. In 2007 The New York Times went free; this year, so will much of The Wall Street Journal. (The re

  anderson.chris longtail

• 21 Jul 08
  

  Scott Thompson

  free business economics marketing wired internet blogs advertising delicious

• 15 Jul 08
  

  Leyla Bonilla

  business free articulos interesante economics

  • From the consumer's perspective, though, there is a huge difference between cheap and free. Give a product away and it can go viral. Charge a single cent for it and you're in an entirely different business, one of clawing and scratching for every customer. The psychology of "free" is powerful indeed, as any marketer will tell you.

    
    

    This difference between cheap and free is what venture capitalist Josh Kopelman calls the "penny gap." People think demand is elastic and that volume falls in a straight line as price rises, but the truth is that zero is one market and any other price is another. In many cases, that's the difference between a great market and none at all.

  • From the consumer's perspective, though, there is a huge difference between cheap and free. Give a product away and it can go viral. Charge a single cent for it and you're in an entirely different business, one of clawing and scratching for every customer. The psychology of "free" is powerful indeed, as any marketer will tell you.

    
    

    This difference between cheap and free is what venture capitalist Josh Kopelman calls the "penny gap." People think demand is elastic and that volume falls in a straight line as price rises, but the truth is that zero is one market and any other price is another. In many cases, that's the difference between a great market and none at all.

  • 9 more annotations...
  • • This difference between cheap and free is what venture capitalist Josh Kopelman calls the "penny gap." People think demand is elastic and that volume falls in a straight line as price rises, but the truth is that zero is one market and any other price is another. In many cases, that's the difference between a great market and none at all.
    • In the traditional media model, a publisher provides a product free (or nearly free) to consumers, and advertisers pay to ride along. Radio is "free to air," and so is much of television. Likewise, newspaper and magazine publishers don't charge readers anything close to the actual cost of creating, printing, and distributing their products. They're not selling papers and magazines to readers, they're selling readers to advertisers. It's a three-way market.
    • · "Freemium"
      
      What's free: Web software and services, some content. Free to whom: users of the basic version.
    • · Advertising
      
      What's free: content, services, software, and more. Free to whom: everyone.
    • · Cross-subsidies
      
      What's free: any product that entices you to pay for something else. Free to whom: everyone willing to pay eventually, one way or another.

    • On a busy corner in São Paulo, Brazil, street vendors pitch the latest "tecnobrega" CDs, including one by a hot band called Banda Calypso. Like CDs from most street vendors, these did not come from a record label. But neither are they illicit. They came directly from the band. Calypso distributes masters of its CDs and CD liner art to street vendor networks in towns it plans to tour, with full agreement that the vendors will copy the CDs, sell them, and keep all the money. That's OK, because selling discs isn't Calypso's main source of income. The band is really in the performance business — and business is good. Traveling from town to town this way, preceded by a wave of supercheap CDs, Calypso has filled its shows and paid for a private jet.

      
      

      The vendors generate literal street cred in each town Calypso visits, and its omnipresence in the urban soundscape means that it gets huge crowds to its rave/dj/concert events. Free music is just publicity for a far more lucrative tour business. Nobody thinks of this as piracy.

    • · Zero marginal cost
      
      What's free: things that can be distributed without an appreciable cost to anyone. Free to whom: everyone.

      
      

      This describes nothing so well as online music. Between digital reproduction and peer-to-peer distribution, the real cost of distributing music has truly hit bottom.

    • · Labor exchange
      
      What's free: Web sites and services. Free to whom: all users, since the act of using these sites and services actually creates something of value.
    • · Gift economy
      
      What's free: the whole enchilada, be it open source software or user-generated content. Free to whom: everyone.
• 05 Jul 08
  

  Javed Alam

  FREE CHANGES EVERYTHING
  Between digital economics and the wholesale embrace of King's Gillette's experiment in price shifting, we are entering an era when free will be seen as the norm, not an anomaly. How big a deal is that? Well, consider this analogy: In 1954, at the dawn of nuclear power, Lewis Strauss, head of the Atomic Energy Commission, promised that we were entering an age when electricity would be "too cheap to meter." Needless to say, that didn't happen, mostly because the risks of nuclear energy hugely increased its costs. But what if he'd been right? What if electricity had in fact become virtually free?The answer is that everything electricity touched — which is to say just about everything — would have been transformed. Rather than balance electricity against other energy sources, we'd use electricity for as many things as we could — we'd waste it, in fact, because it would be too cheap to worry about.
  
  All buildings would be electrically heated, never mind the thermal conversion rate. We'd all be driving electric cars (free electricity would be incentive enough to develop the efficient battery technology to store it). Massive desalination plants would turn seawater into all the freshwater anyone could want, irrigating vast inland swaths and turning deserts into fertile acres, many of them making biofuels as a cheaper store of energy than batteries. Relative to free electrons, fossil fuels would be seen as ludicrously expensive and dirty, and so carbon emissions would plummet. The phrase "global warming" would have never entered the language.
  
  Today it's digital technologies, not electricity, that have become too cheap to meter. It took decades to shake off the assumption that computing was supposed to be rationed for the few, and we're only now starting to liberate bandwidth and storage from the same poverty of imagination. But a generation raised on the free Web is coming of age, and they will find entirely new ways to embrace waste, transforming the world in the process. Because free is what you

  wired article cost of free

• 01 Jul 08
  

  Dennis Richards

  At the age of 40, King Gillette was a frustrated inventor, a bitter anticapitalist, and a salesman of cork-lined bottle caps. It was 1895, and despite ideas, energy, and wealthy parents, he had little to show for his work. He blamed the evils of market competition. Indeed, the previous year he had published a book, The Human Drift, which argued that all industry should be taken over by a single corporation owned by the public and that millions of Americans should live in a giant city called Metropolis powered by Niagara Falls. His boss at the bottle cap company, meanwhile, had just one piece of advice: Invent something people use and throw away.

  free web 2.0 sharing

  • At the age of 40, King Gillette was a frustrated inventor, a bitter anticapitalist, and a salesman of cork-lined bottle caps. It was 1895, and despite ideas, energy, and wealthy parents, he had little to show for his work. He blamed the evils of market competition. Indeed, the previous year he had published a book, The Human Drift, which argued that all industry should be taken over by a single corporation owned by the public and that millions of Americans should live in a giant city called Metropolis powered by Niagara Falls. His boss at the bottle cap company, meanwhile, had just one piece of advice: Invent something people use and throw away.
• 30 Jun 08
  

  graeme wood

  08 update of the orginal Wired article

  attention free business marketing

• 23 Jun 08
  

  Gianto Widianto

  Internet Blog Media

• 21 Jun 08
  

  matthew schumacher

  free trends marketing business economics wired

• 29 May 08
  

  fncpln

  You'd get one thing free if you bought another, or you'd get a product free only if you paid for a service.

  free business economics marketing wired trends strategy

• 16 May 08
  

  Rob Crowther

  Web2.0 Economics

• 07 May 08
  

  feasandee

  economics web

• 05 May 08
  

  eduardo chavez

  Internet economy business models advertising etc.

• 28 Apr 08
  

  Adriana Lukas

  this is basically 'because effect' model. you don't make money with something (that can be or is free) but because of it. See blogging bring money not via ads but reputation and its application elsewhere. "But free is not quite as simple — or as stupid

  becauseeffect freeconomics chrisandersen wired free web business models resources scarcity waste delicious

• 

  miyama

  wired article Business management toread

• 22 Apr 08
  

  Moritz Schroeder

  article business innovation wired trends strategy businessmodel freemodel todoresearch

• 15 Apr 08
  

  spot
  • A typical online site follows the 1 Percent Rule — 1 percent of users support all the rest. In the freemium model, that means for every user who pays for the premium version of the site, 99 others get the basic free version. The reason this works is that the cost of serving the 99 percent is close enough to zero to call it nothing
  • Ryanair, for instance, has disrupted its industry by defining itself more as a full-service travel agency than a seller of airline seats
  • 7 more annotations...
  • • he first is the extension of King Gillette's cross-subsidy to more and more industries.
    • ast year, Yahoo announced that Yahoo Mail, its free webmail service, would provide unlimited storage
    • the audience-building merits of zero
    • free versus pay online are ending
    • cross-subsidy: You'd get one thing free if you bought another, or you'd get a product free only if you paid for a service.
    • y giving away the razors, which were useless by themselves, he was creating demand for disposable blades.
    • He sold millions of razors to the Army at a steep discount, hoping the habits soldiers developed at war would carry over to peacetime.
• 01 Apr 08
  

  David Alfaro

  marketing monetization web

• 31 Mar 08
  

  wilhelm123 Nachname

  anderson_chris business theorie web2.0

• 30 Mar 08
  

  Wesley Shu

  chris_anderson free razor-and-blades wired

  • But until recently, practically everything "free" was really just the result of what economists would call a cross-subsidy: You'd get one thing free if you bought another, or you'd get a product free only if you paid for a service.
  • the last debates over free versus pay online are ending. In 2007 The New York Times went free; this year, so will much of The Wall Street Journal.
  • 4 more annotations...
  • • Last year, Yahoo announced that Yahoo Mail, its free webmail service, would provide unlimited storage.
    • The first is the extension of King Gillette's cross-subsidy to more and more industries. Technology is giving companies greater flexibility in how broadly they can define their markets, allowing them more freedom to give away products or services to one set of customers while selling to another set.
    • The second trend is simply that anything that touches digital networks quickly feels the effect of falling costs.
    • The moment a company's primary expenses become things based in silicon, free becomes not just an option but the inevitable destination.
• 27 Mar 08
  

  Jen Fitzgerald

  free gillette taxonomy wired

• 

  Gregory Bruce

  free business strategy internet

• 

  Jem Fleming

  freeworld materialist work

• 26 Mar 08
  

  kaeanne

  future of internet what is free?

  • he was creating demand for disposable blades.
  • What does this mean for the notion of free?
  • 1 more annotations...
  • • the original "free lunch" was a gratis meal for anyone who ordered at least one beer
• 25 Mar 08
  

  Martin Carel
  • huge psychological gap between "almost zero" and "zero"
  • To follow the money, you have to shift from a basic view of a market as a matching of two parties — buyers and sellers — to a broader sense of an ecosystem with many parties, only some of which exchange cash.
  • 11 more annotations...
  • • The most common of the economies built around free is the three-party system. Here a third party pays to participate in a market created by a free exchange between the first two parties. Sound complicated? You're probably experiencing it right now. It's the basis of virtually all media.

    • 
      

      In a sense, what the Web represents is the extension of the media business model to industries of all sorts. This is not simply the notion that advertising will pay for everything. There are dozens of ways that media companies make money around free content, from selling information about consumers to brand licensing, "value-added" subscriptions, and direct ecommerce

    • But for digital products, this ratio of free to paid is reversed. A typical online site follows the 1 Percent Rule — 1 percent of users support all the rest. In the freemium model, that means for every user who pays for the premium version of the site, 99 others get the basic free version. The reason this works is that the cost of serving the 99 percent is close enough to zero to call it nothing.
    • All of these approaches are based on the principle that free offerings build audiences with distinct interests and expressed needs that advertisers will pay to reach.
    • The vendors generate literal street cred in each town Calypso visits, and its omnipresence in the urban soundscape means that it gets huge crowds to its rave/dj/concert events. Free music is just publicity for a far more lucrative tour business. Nobody thinks of this as piracy.
    • That force is so powerful that laws, guilt trips, DRM, and every other barrier to piracy the labels can think of have failed. Some artists give away their music online as a way of marketing concerts, merchandise, licensing, and other paid fare. But others have simply accepted that, for them, music is not a moneymaking business.
    • In a sense, zero-cost distribution has turned sharing into an industry. In the monetary economy it all looks free — indeed, in the monetary economy it looks like unfair competition — but that says more about our shortsighted ways of measuring value than it does about the worth of what's created.
    • The word is externalities, a concept that holds that money is not the only scarcity in the world. Chief among the others are your time and respect, two factors that we've always known about but have only recently been able to measure properly.
    • There is, presumably, a limited supply of reputation and attention in the world at any point in time. These are the new scarcities — and the world of free exists mostly to acquire these valuable assets for the sake of a business model to be identified later. Free shifts the economy from a focus on only that which can be quantified in dollars and cents to a more realistic accounting of all the things we truly value today.
    • Well, consider this analogy: In 1954, at the dawn of nuclear power, Lewis Strauss, head of the Atomic Energy Commission, promised that we were entering an age when electricity would be "too cheap to meter."
    • Today it's digital technologies, not electricity, that have become too cheap to meter. It took decades to shake off the assumption that computing was supposed to be rationed for the few, and we're only now starting to liberate bandwidth and storage from the same poverty of imagination. But a generation raised on the free Web is coming of age, and they will find entirely new ways to embrace waste, transforming the world in the process. Because free is what you want — and free, increasingly, is what you're going to get.
• 

  Lynette Webb

  business-model

• 

  Paul Ak

  ChrisAnderson OriginalArticle Wired

• 

  Ms Day38
  • He sold razors in bulk to banks so they could give them away with new deposits
    ("shave and save" campaigns).

    • 

      Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25

      This was a good idea. The public would get use to his product and want to purchase it on his or her own.
  • this business model is now the foundation of entire industries: Give away the
    cell phone, sell the monthly plan; make the videogame console cheap and sell
    expensive games; install fancy coffeemakers in offices at no charge so you can
    sell managers expensive coffee sachets.

    • 

      Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25

      This is so true. I never looked the business quite like this, but it is true. Give away the main product and sell the "make-it-work" feature for a high price.
      
      For example, cell phones cost almost nothing to make - just like the Swatch - but they sell it for 10x times the price to the "cell junkies" like myself for an arm, leg, and possibly kidney (smile).
    • 

      kaeanne on 2008-03-29

      i can completely relate to that! consumers are willing to pay whatever they have to so they could have state of the art merchandise, when it required a fraction of the cost to produce it!
  • 7 more annotations...
  • • Thanks to Gillette, the idea that you can make money by giving something away is
      no longer radical.

      • 

        Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25

        I don't know how true this statement is in other product worlds, but it is still very popular with the cell phone companies.
    • Virtually everything Google does is free to consumers, from Gmail to Picasa to
      GOOG-411.

      • 

        Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25

        For this reason, Google is VERY popular.
      • 

        kaeanne on 2008-03-26

        i agree, i use google several times a day and i know friends who depend on it!
    • But tell that to the poor CIO who just shelled out six figures to buy another
      rack of servers. Technology sure doesn't feel free when you're buying it by the
      gross. Yet if you look at it from the other side of the fat pipe, the economics
      change. That expensive bank of hard drives (fixed costs) can serve tens of
      thousands of users (marginal costs). The Web is all about scale, finding ways to
      attract the most users for centralized resources, spreading those costs over
      larger and larger audiences as the technology gets more and more capable. It's
      not about the cost of the equipment in the racks at the data center; it's about
      what that equipment can do. And every year, like some sort of magic clockwork,
      it does more and more for less and less, bringing the marginal costs of
      technology in the units that we individuals consume closer to zero.

      • 

        Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25

        Okay, all this is Yiddish to me. Are the saying the "free" purpose is to allow the users to see how useful the services are and eventually make them pay in the future?
      • 

        kaeanne on 2008-03-29

        I agree...no matter how many times i re-read this, i fail to comprehend what is going on.
    • As much as we complain about how expensive things are getting, we're surrounded
      by forces that are making them cheaper.

      • 

        Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25

        This is so true!!
      • 

        kaeanne on 2008-03-29

        i found that ironically valid as well!
    • The Web has become the land of the free.

      • 

        Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25

        "free" as far as money is concerned, but we pay in other ways such as viruses, pop ups, spyware, being spyed on by the government, and a source other other "issues" that I am not even aware of.
    • From the consumer's perspective, though, there is a huge difference between
      cheap and free. Give a product away and it can go viral. Charge a single cent
      for it and you're in an entirely different business, one of clawing and
      scratching for every customer. The psychology of "free" is powerful indeed, as
      any marketer will tell you.

      • 

        Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25

        I don't understand how we can continue to allow an openly deceiving word such as "free" to entice and seduce us into meaningless crap. NOTHING IS FREE!!
      • 

        kaeanne on 2008-03-29

        nothing may be free, but they do a great job of convincing us it is. by having us believe and buy into their ploys they make more money and their bussiness grows.
      • 2 more sticky notes...
      • • 

          Kamil Szot on 2008-04-25

          Actually most free software is really free, noone tries to market anything with it. Authors just give it away because they want and can.
        • 

          eduardo chavez on 2008-05-05

          Wikipedia is free. And no adds either!
    • The most common of the economies built around free is the three-party system.
      Here a third party pays to participate in a market created by a free exchange
      between the first two parties. Sound complicated? You're probably experiencing
      it right now. It's the basis of virtually all media.
• 22 Mar 08
  

  Lino Oliveira

  web2.0 marketing trends business Free

• 14 Mar 08
  

  losamorales g

  quickd

• 12 Mar 08
  

  Britt Watwood

  longtail opensource business trends

• 11 Mar 08
  

  Jim Jee

  acca article free gilette price pricing

  • One day, while he was shaving with a straight razor that was so worn it could no longer be sharpened, the idea came to him. What if the blade could be made of a thin metal strip? Rather than spending time maintaining the blades, men could simply discard them when they became dull.
  • In its first year, 1903, Gillette sold a total of 51 razors and 168 blades.
  • 15 more annotations...
  • • The freebies helped to sell those products, but the tactic helped Gillette even more. By giving away the razors, which were useless by themselves, he was creating demand for disposable blades. A few billion blades later, this business model is now the foundation of entire industries: Give away the cell phone, sell the monthly plan; make the videogame console cheap and sell expensive games; install fancy coffeemakers in offices at no charge so you can sell managers expensive coffee sachets.
    • Over the past decade, however, a different sort of free has emerged. The new model is based not on cross-subsidies — the shifting of costs from one product to another — but on the fact that the cost of products themselves is falling fast.
    • "Information wants to be free. Information also wants to be expensive ... That tension will not go away."
    • Which is to say, the trend lines that determine the cost of doing business online all point the same way: to zero.
    • Last year, Yahoo announced that Yahoo Mail, its free webmail service, would provide unlimited storage. Just in case that wasn't totally clear, that's "unlimited" as in "infinite."
    • So the market price of online storage, at least for email, has now fallen to zero
    • In economics, the parallel is this: If the unitary cost of technology ("per megabyte" or "per megabit per second" or "per thousand floating-point operations per second") is halving every 18 months, when does it come close enough to zero to say that you've arrived and can safely round down to nothing? The answer: almost always sooner than you think.
    • This difference between cheap and free is what venture capitalist Josh Kopelman calls the "penny gap." People think demand is elastic and that volume falls in a straight line as price rises, but the truth is that zero is one market and any other price is another. In many cases, that's the difference between a great market and none at all.
    • Just because products are free doesn't mean that someone, somewhere, isn't making huge gobs of money. Google is the prime example of this. The monetary benefits of craigslist are enormous as well, but they're distributed among its tens of thousands of users rather than funneled straight to Craig Newmark Inc. To follow the money, you have to shift from a basic view of a market as a matching of two parties — buyers and sellers — to a broader sense of an ecosystem with many parties, only some of which exchange cash.
    • A typical online site follows the 1 Percent Rule — 1 percent of users support all the rest. In the freemium model, that means for every user who pays for the premium version of the site, 99 others get the basic free version.
    • When Wal-Mart charges $15 for a new hit DVD, it's a loss leader. The company is offering the DVD below cost to lure you into the store, where it hopes to sell you a washing machine at a profit.
    • Between digital reproduction and peer-to-peer distribution, the real cost of distributing music has truly hit bottom.

    • Milton Friedman himself reminded us time and time again that "there's no such thing as a free lunch.
      
      

      
      "But Friedman was wrong in two ways. First, a free lunch doesn't necessarily mean the food is being given away or that you'll pay for it later — it could just mean someone else is picking up the tab. Second, in the digital realm, as we've seen, the main feedstocks of the information economy — storage, processing power, and bandwidth — are getting cheaper by the day. Two of the main scarcity functions of traditional economics — the marginal costs of manufacturing and distribution — are rushing headlong to zip. It's as if the restaurant suddenly didn't have to pay any food or labor costs for that lunch.

      
      

      Surely economics has something to say about that?

      • 

        Jim Jee on 2008-03-11

        Perhaps the core idea of the article...

    • Thanks to Google, we now have a handy way to convert from reputation (PageRank) to attention (traffic) to money (ads). Anything you can consistently convert to cash is a form of currency itself, and Google plays the role of central banker for these new economies.

      
      

      There is, presumably, a limited supply of reputation and attention in the world at any point in time.

    • Chris Anderson (canderson@wired.com) is the editor in chief of Wired and author of The Long Tail. His next book, FREE, will be published in 2009 by Hyperion.

      • 

        Jim Jee on 2008-03-11

        A cool illustration of the discussed concepts - a paid book based on a free article :o)
      • 

        kaeanne on 2008-03-26

        i thought that was funny!
• 10 Mar 08
  

  lauren pressley

  business free economics marketing Wired trends strategy

• 

  Jaap Walhout

  businessmodel strategy

• 06 Mar 08
  

  David Wayne

  King Gillette's 1895 disposable blades made good freebies to help sell other products. Companies use his business model today to create demand for their goods: Give away the cell phone, sell the monthly plan; make the videogame console cheap and sell expe

  business free

• 05 Mar 08
  

  Marian Steinbach

  free excerpt of Chris Anderson's new book "FREE"

  business

• 04 Mar 08
  

  emmaline hill

  web free business

• 

  Ramón Suárez

  Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business By Chris Anderson

  advertising article blogs business computer free economics marketing wired trends strategy internet technology online pricing

• 03 Mar 08
  

  yingeli Fischer

  ae_08

• 

  articles business models toread

• 

  vincenz DaVz
  • The Web is all about scale, finding ways to attract the most users for centralized resources, spreading those costs over larger and larger audiences as the technology gets more and more capable. It's not about the cost of the equipment in the racks at the data center; it's about what that equipment can do. And every year, like some sort of magic clockwork, it does more and more for less and less, bringing the marginal costs of technology in the units that we individuals consume closer to zero.
  • It's now clear that practically everything Web technology touches starts down the path to gratis, at least as far as we consumers are concerned. Storage now joins bandwidth (YouTube: free) and processing power (Google: free) in the race to the bottom.
  • 22 more annotations...
  • • Basic economics tells us that in a competitive market, price falls to the marginal cost. There's never been a more competitive market than the Internet, and every day the marginal cost of digital information comes closer to nothing.
    • Technology is giving companies greater flexibility in how broadly they can define their markets, allowing them more freedom to give away products or services to one set of customers while selling to another set
    • anything that touches digital networks quickly feels the effect of falling costs.
    • There's nothing new about technology's deflationary force, but what is new is the speed at which industries of all sorts are becoming digital businesses and thus able to exploit those economics.
    • What's interesting is that transistors (or storage, or bandwidth) don't have to be completely free to invoke this effect. At a certain point, they're cheap enough to be safely disregarded
    • f the unitary cost of technology ("per megabyte" or "per megabit per second" or "per thousand floating-point operations per second") is halving every 18 months, when does it come close enough to zero to say that you've arrived and can safely round down to nothing? The answer: almost always sooner than you think.
    • From the consumer's perspective, though, there is a huge difference between cheap and free.
    • This difference between cheap and free is what venture capitalist Josh Kopelman calls the "penny gap." People think demand is elastic and that volume falls in a straight line as price rises, but the truth is that zero is one market and any other price is another. In many cases, that's the difference between a great market and none at all.
    • The huge psychological gap between "almost zero" and "zero" is why micropayments failed.
    • Traditionalists wring their hands about the "vaporization of value" and "demonetization" of entire industries.
    • To follow the money, you have to shift from a basic view of a market as a matching of two parties — buyers and sellers — to a broader sense of an ecosystem with many parties, only some of which exchange cash.
    • In the traditional media model, a publisher provides a product free (or nearly free) to consumers, and advertisers pay to ride along.
    • hey're selling readers to advertisers.
    • what the Web represents is the extension of the media business model to industries of all sorts
    • This is not simply the notion that advertising will pay for everything. There are dozens of ways that media companies make money around free content, from selling information about consumers to brand licensing, "value-added" subscriptions, and direct ecommerce (see How-To Wiki for a complete list). Now an entire ecosystem of Web companies is growing up around the same set of models.
    • "Freemium"
      
      What's free: Web software and services, some content. Free to whom: users of the basic version.
    • Advertising
      
      What's free: content, services, software, and more. Free to whom: everyone.
    • · Cross-subsidies
      
      What's free: any product that entices you to pay for something else. Free to whom: everyone willing to pay eventually, one way or another.
    • Zero marginal cost
      
      What's free: things that can be distributed without an appreciable cost to anyone. Free to whom: everyone.
    • · Labor exchange
      
      What's free: Web sites and services. Free to whom: all users, since the act of using these sites and services actually creates something of value.
    • · Gift economy
      
      What's free: the whole enchilada, be it open source software or user-generated content. Free to whom: everyone.
    • Today it's digital technologies, not electricity, that have become too cheap to meter. It took decades to shake off the assumption that computing was supposed to be rationed for the few, and we're only now starting to liberate bandwidth and storage from the same poverty of imagination. But a generation raised on the free Web is coming of age, and they will find entirely new ways to embrace waste, transforming the world in the process. Because free is what you want — and free, increasingly, is what you're going to get.
• 

  folasm

  article good

  • s why Google doesn't show up on your credit card. It's why modern Web companies don't charge their users anything. And it's why Yahoo gives away disk drive space. The question of infinite storage was not if but when. The winners made their stuff free first.
• 

  alfred westerveld

  quickd toread

• 

  Emanuele Quintarelli

  2008 business models chris anderson free freeconomics wired

  • Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business
    >
• 02 Mar 08
  

  Mario A Núñez

  g40

• 

  efender

  economía internet modelos tendencias web

  • Business
• 

  Frances Rosàs

  interesting

• 

  John Short

  Advertising Marketing etc.

• 01 Mar 08
  

  André Felipe

  marketing articles

• 

  viv zhang

  business economic internet wired

• 

  Hans Wobbe

  $

  • Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business

    • 

      Hans Wobbe on 2008-03-01

      Worth hi-liting...
    • 

      Hans Wobbe on 2008-03-01

      Annotate each of the 6 basic models.
• 

  FruFru FourOne

  a Wired article written by Chris Anderson

  advertising article articles attention book business computing digital ebook economics economy fablog inspiration interesting Internet marketing music network newmedia news opensource publishing research software startup strategy tech to_read toread trend

• 29 Feb 08
  

  sborowski

  strategy Ideas innovation

  • Once a marketing gimmick, free has emerged as a full-fledged economy. Offering free music proved successful for Radiohead, Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails, and a swarm of other bands on MySpace that grasped the audience-building merits of zero. The fastest-growing parts of the gaming industry are ad-supported casual games online and free-to-try massively multiplayer online games. Virtually everything Google does is free to consumers, from Gmail to Picasa to GOOG-411.
    The rise of "freeconomics" is being driven by the underlying technologies that power the Web. Just as Moore's law dictates that a unit of processing power halves in price every 18 months, the price of bandwidth and storage is dropping even faster. Which is to say, the trend lines that determine the cost of doing business online all point the same way: to zero.
• 

  Tom Sepp
• 

  Ivan Ičin

  Business

  • Once a marketing gimmick, free has emerged as a full-fledged economy. Offering free music proved successful for Radiohead, Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails, and a swarm of other bands on MySpace that grasped the audience-building merits of zero. The fastest-growing parts of the gaming industry are ad-supported casual games online and free-to-try massively multiplayer online games. Virtually everything Google does is free to consumers, from Gmail to Picasa to GOOG-411.
• 28 Feb 08
  

  Howard Dunlavy

  Miscellaneous

• 

  Harold Carey

  marketing free

• 

  Miguel guhlin

  research

• 

  Christian Tobogan

  business

  • Anything you can consistently convert to cash is a form of currency itself,
• 

  giorgosn N
• 27 Feb 08
  

  Guillaume FRAT
• 

  maarten cannaerts
  • Today it's digital technologies, not electricity, that have become too cheap to meter. It took decades to shake off the assumption that computing was supposed to be rationed for the few, and we're only now starting to liberate bandwidth and storage from the same poverty of imagination. But a generation raised on the free Web is coming of age, and they will find entirely new ways to embrace waste, transforming the world in the process. Because free is what you want — and free, increasingly, is what you're going to get
  • Today it's digital technologies, not electricity, that have become too cheap to meter. It took decades to shake off the assumption that computing was supposed to be rationed for the few, and we're only now starting to liberate bandwidth and storage from the same poverty of imagination. But a generation raised on the free Web is coming of age, and they will find entirely new ways to embrace waste, transforming the world in the process. Because free is what you want — and free, increasingly, is what you're going to get
• 

  Muhammad Ulinnuha

  entrepreneur

• 26 Feb 08
  

  mjklin

  Business future

• 

  Martin Menu
• 

  Owen Mathews

  toconsume technology business free intellectualproperty

• 

  Joel Liu

  business economics pattern

  • A few billion blades later, this business model is now the foundation of entire industries: Give away the cell phone, sell the monthly plan; make the videogame console cheap and sell expensive games; install fancy coffeemakers in offices at no charge so you can sell managers expensive coffee sachets.
  • But until recently, practically everything "free" was really just the result of what economists would call a cross-subsidy: You'd get one thing free if you bought another, or you'd get a product free only if you paid for a service.
  • 17 more annotations...
  • • You know this freaky land of free as the Web. A decade and a half into the great online experiment, the last debates over free versus pay online are ending. In 2007 The New York Times went free; this year, so will much of The Wall Street Journal. (The remaining fee-based parts, new owner Rupert Murdoch announced, will be "really special ... and, sorry to tell you, probably more expensive." This calls to mind one version of Stewart Brand's original aphorism from 1984: "Information wants to be free. Information also wants to be expensive ... That tension will not go away.")
    • The rise of "freeconomics" is being driven by the underlying technologies that power the Web. Just as Moore's law dictates that a unit of processing power halves in price every 18 months, the price of bandwidth and storage is dropping even faster. Which is to say, the trend lines that determine the cost of doing business online all point the same way: to zero.
    • The Web is all about scale, finding ways to attract the most users for centralized resources, spreading those costs over larger and larger audiences as the technology gets more and more capable. It's not about the cost of the equipment in the racks at the data center; it's about what that equipment can do. And every year, like some sort of magic clockwork, it does more and more for less and less, bringing the marginal costs of technology in the units that we individuals consume closer to zero.
    • Digital technology benefits from these dynamics and from something else even more powerful: the 20th-century shift from Newtonian to quantum machines. We're still just beginning to exploit atomic-scale effects in revolutionary new materials — semiconductors (processing power), ferromagnetic compounds (storage), and fiber optics (bandwidth). In the arc of history, all three substances are still new, and we have a lot to learn about them. We are just a few decades into the discovery of a new world.
    • For good reason: It's now clear that practically everything Web technology touches starts down the path to gratis, at least as far as we consumers are concerned. Storage now joins bandwidth (YouTube: free) and processing power (Google: free) in the race to the bottom. Basic economics tells us that in a competitive market, price falls to the marginal cost. There's never been a more competitive market than the Internet, and every day the marginal cost of digital information comes closer to nothing.
    • The second trend is simply that anything that touches digital networks quickly feels the effect of falling costs. There's nothing new about technology's deflationary force, but what is new is the speed at which industries of all sorts are becoming digital businesses and thus able to exploit those economics. When Google turned advertising into a software application, a classic services business formerly based on human economics (things get more expensive each year) switched to software economics (things get cheaper). So, too, for everything from banking to gambling. The moment a company's primary expenses become things based in silicon, free becomes not just an option but the inevitable destination.
    • Their role was to conserve transistors, and they not only decided what was worthy but also encouraged programmers to make the most economical use of their computer time. As a result, early developers devoted as much code as possible to running their core algorithms efficiently and gave little thought to user interface. This was the era of the command line, and the only conceivable reason someone might have wanted to use a computer at home was to organize recipe files. In fact, the world's first personal computer, a stylish kitchen appliance offered by Honeywell in 1969, came with integrated counter space.
    • The purpose of this profligate eye candy? Ease of use for regular folks, including children. Kay's work on the graphical user interface became the inspiration for the Xerox Alto, and then the Apple Macintosh, which changed the world by opening computing to the rest of us. (We, in turn, found no shortage of things to do with it; tellingly, organizing recipes was not high on the list.)

    • From the consumer's perspective, though, there is a huge difference between cheap and free. Give a product away and it can go viral. Charge a single cent for it and you're in an entirely different business, one of clawing and scratching for every customer. The psychology of "free" is powerful indeed, as any marketer will tell you.

      
      

      This difference between cheap and free is what venture capitalist Josh Kopelman calls the "penny gap." People think demand is elastic and that volume falls in a straight line as price rises, but the truth is that zero is one market and any other price is another. In many cases, that's the difference between a great market and none at all.

    • But free is not quite as simple — or as stupid — as it sounds. Just because products are free doesn't mean that someone, somewhere, isn't making huge gobs of money. Google is the prime example of this. The monetary benefits of craigslist are enormous as well, but they're distributed among its tens of thousands of users rather than funneled straight to Craig Newmark Inc. To follow the money, you have to shift from a basic view of a market as a matching of two parties — buyers and sellers — to a broader sense of an ecosystem with many parties, only some of which exchange cash.
    • In the traditional media model, a publisher provides a product free (or nearly free) to consumers, and advertisers pay to ride along. Radio is "free to air," and so is much of television. Likewise, newspaper and magazine publishers don't charge readers anything close to the actual cost of creating, printing, and distributing their products. They're not selling papers and magazines to readers, they're selling readers to advertisers. It's a three-way market.
    • But for digital products, this ratio of free to paid is reversed. A typical online site follows the 1 Percent Rule — 1 percent of users support all the rest. In the freemium model, that means for every user who pays for the premium version of the site, 99 others get the basic free version. The reason this works is that the cost of serving the 99 percent is close enough to zero to call it nothing.
    • In any package of products and services, from banking to mobile calling plans, the price of each individual component is often determined by psychology, not cost. Your cell phone company may not make money on your monthly minutes — it keeps that fee low because it knows that's the first thing you look at when picking a carrier — but your monthly voicemail fee is pure profit.

    • Labor exchange
      
      What's free: Web sites and services. Free to whom: all users, since the act of using these sites and services actually creates something of value.

      
      

      You can get free porn if you solve a few captchas, those scrambled text boxes used to block bots. What you're actually doing is giving answers to a bot used by spammers to gain access to other sites — which is worth more to them than the bandwidth you'll consume browsing images. Likewise for rating stories on Digg, voting on Yahoo Answers, or using Google's 411 service (see "How Can Directory Assistance Be Free?"). In each case, the act of using the service creates something of value, either improving the service itself or creating information that can be useful somewhere else.

    • It does. The word is externalities, a concept that holds that money is not the only scarcity in the world. Chief among the others are your time and respect, two factors that we've always known about but have only recently been able to measure properly. The "attention economy" and "reputation economy" are too fuzzy to merit an academic department, but there's something real at the heart of both. Thanks to Google, we now have a handy way to convert from reputation (PageRank) to attention (traffic) to money (ads). Anything you can consistently convert to cash is a form of currency itself, and Google plays the role of central banker for these new economies.

      
      

      There is, presumably, a limited supply of reputation and attention in the world at any point in time. These are the new scarcities — and the world of free exists mostly to acquire these valuable assets for the sake of a business model to be identified later. Free shifts the economy from a focus on only that which can be quantified in dollars and cents to a more realistic accounting of all the things we truly value today.

    • Well, consider this analogy: In 1954, at the dawn of nuclear power, Lewis Strauss, head of the Atomic Energy Commission, promised that we were entering an age when electricity would be "too cheap to meter." Needless to say, that didn't happen, mostly because the risks of nuclear energy hugely increased its costs. But what if he'd been right? What if electricity had in fact become virtually free?The answer is that everything electricity touched — which is to say just about everything — would have been transformed. Rather than balance electricity against other energy sources, we'd use electricity for as many things as we could — we'd waste it, in fact, because it would be too cheap to worry about.
    • Today it's digital technologies, not electricity, that have become too cheap to meter. It took decades to shake off the assumption that computing was supposed to be rationed for the few, and we're only now starting to liberate bandwidth and storage from the same poverty of imagination. But a generation raised on the free Web is coming of age, and they will find entirely new ways to embrace waste, transforming the world in the process. Because free is what you want — and free, increasingly, is what you're going to get.
• 

  peterey

  Business Web

  • a
• 

  Elisabeth Nesheim

  Chris Anderson via Wired gives an introduction to freeconomics. From his new book Free!

  free economics freeconomics wired business_model

• 

  karelgnr8

  Businessmodels longtail ChrisAnderson free

• 

  Doug McCaughan

  free economics business Wired trends strategy marketing fordoug toread

• 

  Peter Lai

  Give away the razor, sell the blades.

  article(type_of_object) wired(source) Chris_Anderson(author) strategy(about) economics(about) marketing(about) trends(about) business(about) for:simile

• 

  KO -

  business

• 

  Thomas Jakubowski

  article economics free business trends wired marketing strategy internet innovation inspiration businessmodel book

Public Stiky Notes

• 
  Hans Wobbe on 2008-03-01
  Annotate each of the 6 basic models.
• 
  Hans Wobbe on 2008-03-01
  Worth hi-liting...
• 
  Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25
  This was a good idea. The public would get use to his product and want to purchase it on his or her own.
• 
  kaeanne on 2008-03-29
  i can completely relate to that! consumers are willing to pay whatever they have to so they could have state of the art merchandise, when it required a fraction of the cost to produce it!
• 
  Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25
  This is so true. I never looked the business quite like this, but it is true. Give away the main product and sell the "make-it-work" feature for a high price.
  
  For example, cell phones cost almost nothing to make - just like the Swatch - but they sell it for 10x times the price to the "cell junkies" like myself for an arm, leg, and possibly kidney (smile).
• 
  Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25
  I don't know how true this statement is in other product worlds, but it is still very popular with the cell phone companies.
• 
  kaeanne on 2008-03-26
  i agree, i use google several times a day and i know friends who depend on it!
• 
  Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25
  For this reason, Google is VERY popular.
• 
  kaeanne on 2008-03-29
  I agree...no matter how many times i re-read this, i fail to comprehend what is going on.
• 
  Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25
  Okay, all this is Yiddish to me. Are the saying the "free" purpose is to allow the users to see how useful the services are and eventually make them pay in the future?
• 
  kaeanne on 2008-03-29
  i found that ironically valid as well!
• 
  Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25
  This is so true!!
• 
  Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25
  "free" as far as money is concerned, but we pay in other ways such as viruses, pop ups, spyware, being spyed on by the government, and a source other other "issues" that I am not even aware of.
• 
  eduardo chavez on 2008-05-05
  Wikipedia is free. And no adds either!
• 
  Kamil Szot on 2008-04-25
  Actually most free software is really free, noone tries to market anything with it. Authors just give it away because they want and can.
• 
  kaeanne on 2008-03-29
  nothing may be free, but they do a great job of convincing us it is. by having us believe and buy into their ploys they make more money and their bussiness grows.
• 
  Ms Day38 on 2008-03-25
  I don't understand how we can continue to allow an openly deceiving word such as "free" to entice and seduce us into meaningless crap. NOTHING IS FREE!!
• 
  Jim Jee on 2008-03-11
  Perhaps the core idea of the article...
• 
  kaeanne on 2008-03-26
  i thought that was funny!
• 
  Jim Jee on 2008-03-11
  A cool illustration of the discussed concepts - a paid book based on a free article :o)

Page Comments

• 
  viv zhang on 2008-03-01
  《连线》三月号的重点文章，Chris Anderson的《免费经济学》的一部分。
• 
  Jim Jee on 2008-03-11
  Great article on pricing strategy of giving away items for free

Would you like to comment?

Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.