Skip to main content

Diigo Home

Mob Rule! How Users Took Over Twitter | Magazine - The Diigo Meta page

www.wired.com/...ff_twitter - Cached

This link has been bookmarked by 14 people . It was first bookmarked on 19 Oct 2009, by Phil Liff-Grieff.

  • 21 Nov 09
    shanta
    Shanta Rohse

    Corporate culture at Twitter: “If there are three sentences I’d use to describe Twitter,” Stone says, “one of them would be ‘I don’t know.’”"

    twitter mob_rule biz_stone wired corporate_culture

  • 03 Nov 09
  • 02 Nov 09
    • Last August, the people who putatively run Twitter — the small crew that three years ago launched the world’s fastest-growing communications medium — announced a relatively minor change in the way the site functions. The tweak would have a small effect on retweeting, the convention by which Twitter users repost someone else’s informative or amusing message to their own Twitter followers. Retweets start with RT, for “retweet,” and usually cite the first author by user ID. And, importantly, retweeters often add a word or two of commentary about the repeated content.


      But there was a problem: Twitter itself didn’t invent retweeting; it was created by Twitter users. In a blog post explaining the changes to retweets, the company’s second-in-command, Biz Stone, called them “a great example of Twitter teaching us what it wants to be.” The good news, he said, was that Twitter was building retweets right into the site’s architecture. The bad news was that Project Retweet didn’t make any provision for the commentary that users might like to add.


      It didn’t take long for Twitter users to respond: How dare Twitter mess with … Twitter. A self-described “social, search, and viral marketing scientist” named Dan Zarrella posted a passionate cri de coeur, writing that Twitter was about to “completely eviscerate most of the value out of retweets.” That night, Zarrella created a Twitter hashtag — another grassroots Twitter convention, which lets users group their conversations — called #saveretweets. A few tweeters liked the plan, but the general consensus was summed up by one user skilled in Twitter’s uncompromising brevity: “Very bad plan we hates it.”

  • socialspacestation
    Andrew Long

    Headline article at Wired looking into the ongoing retweets saga at Twitter.

    twitter users microblogging mob news

  • 27 Oct 09
  • 26 Oct 09
  • 21 Oct 09
  • ileane
    Ileane Smith

    Last August, the people who putatively run Twitter — the small crew that three years ago launched the world's fastest-growing communications medium

    retweet #SaveReTweets

  • 20 Oct 09
    ampedstatus
    Amped Status

    "Last August, the people who putatively run Twitter announced a relatively minor change in the way the site functions. The tweak would have a small effect on retweeting, the convention by which Twitter users repost someone else's informative or amusing message to their own Twitter followers. Retweets start with RT, for "retweet," and usually cite the first author by user ID. And, importantly, retweeters often add a word or two of commentary about the repeated content. But there was a problem: Twitter itself didn't invent retweeting; it was created by Twitter users. In a blog post explaining the changes to retweets, the company's second-in-command, Biz Stone, called them "a great example of Twitter teaching us what it wants to be." The good news, he said, was that Twitter was building retweets right into the site's architecture. The bad news was that Project Retweet didn't make any provision for the commentary that users might like to add."

    Twitter Social Media

  • 19 Oct 09