This link has been bookmarked by 72 people . It was first bookmarked on 04 Mar 2008, by amy monaghan.
-
14 Nov 11
-
In 2004, the founder of a large technology publishing house, open source software proponent and multi–millionaire Tim O’Reilly coined the phrase Web 2.0, together with a colleague. The event producers needed a catchy title for an upcoming conference. Later, the event title was expanded into a concept that proposed a separation of various versions of the Web. “The Internet was back! This shiny new version of the Internet, the dream of a fully networked, always–connected society was finally going to be realized. The Internet would democratize Big Media, Big Business, Big Government
-
Mr. O’Reilly characterized Web 1.0 through a set of static, one–way browser–based applications like personal Web sites and the encyclopedia Britannica Online, publishing, content management systems, and taxonomies.
-
Web 2.0 is the network as platform, spanning all connected devices; Web 2.0 applications & [are] delivering software as a continually–updated service that gets better the more people use it, consuming and remixing data from multiple sources, including individual users, while providing their own data and services in a form that allows remixing by others, creating network effects through an ‘architecture of participation,’ and & deliver rich user experiences. [9]
-
the building on the efforts of others
-
decentralization of authority, the freedom to share, and re–use [11].
-
Web 2.0 was a pretty crappy name for what’s happening (Microsoft’s name, Live Software, is probably the best term I’ve seen)... Web 2.0 is not about front–end technologies. It’s precisely about back–end, and it’s about meaning and intelligence in the back–end. [15]
-
Which technologies are commonly collected under the Web 2.0 umbrella? Evangelists of the phrase huddle technologies like the Web development technique Ajax [16], the Ruby programming language, CSS, RSS, OpenAPIs [17], wikis, blogs, mashups (digital media works that draw from already existing texts or audio), and podcasts (media files that are distributed over the Internet to be played back on portable media players) under its roof
-
They highlight user–friendly interfaces, activities like tagging, social networking and microformats as Web 2.0 descriptors [18].
-
born–again Web.
-
You will be hard–pressed to
-
-
10 Apr 10
ian mcdonaldThe desires and needs of young users seem to match neatly with the needs of corporaties. There is, to be sure, a difference between the needs of users and the rhetoric of marketers who claim to cater to their desires.
-
20 Nov 09
-
10 Feb 09
-
11 Dec 08
-
20 Nov 08
-
26 Aug 08
-
23 Aug 08
Kristina Hoeppner"Market Ideology and the Myths of Web 2.0"; Abstract: This essay debunks the myths of the Web 2.0 brand and argues that the popularized phrase limits public media discourse and the imagination of a future World Wide Web.
-
10 Aug 08
-
08 Aug 08
-
05 Aug 08
-
18 Jun 08
-
18 May 08
-
12 May 08
-
05 May 08
-
25 Apr 08
-
18 Apr 08
Francisco Arlindo AlvesThis essay debunks the myths of the Web 2.0 brand and argues that the popularized phrase limits public media discourse and the imagination of a future World Wide Web.
-
01 Apr 08
-
28 Mar 08
Robyn JayThis essay debunks the myths of the Web 2.0 brand and argues
that the popularized phrase limits public media discourse and the
imagination of a future World Wide Web. -
26 Mar 08
-
24 Mar 08
-
23 Mar 08
-
19 Mar 08
-
17 Mar 08
Todd SuomelaThis essay debunks the myths of the Web 2.0 brand and argues that the popularized phrase limits public media discourse and the imagination of a future World Wide Web.
web2.0 markets ideology mythology propaganda import-delicious
-
georgiakharpermust read for the backstory on the pervasive market driven sense of what's happening on the Web today. it's not about us -- it's about the same few media giants who it has always been about.
-
15 Mar 08
-
14 Mar 08
monkeywatcher"This essay debunks the myths of the Web 2.0 brand and argues that the popularized phrase limits public media discourse and the imagination of a future World Wide Web."
-
12 Mar 08
-
11 Mar 08
-
10 Mar 08
-
09 Mar 08
-
08 Mar 08
Don LaVangeThis is an article that raises concerns about the notion of "web 2.0" and the future of the net.
Web2.0 technology socialnetworking theory research networks ideology delicious
-
Tom MurphyIn 2004, the founder of a large technology publishing house, open source software proponent and multi–millionaire Tim O’Reilly coined the phrase Web 2.0, together with a colleague. The event producers needed a catchy title for an upcoming conference.
-
07 Mar 08
-
Lisa Spiro"This essay debunks the myths of the Web 2.0 brand and argues that the popularized phrase limits public media discourse and the imagination of a future World Wide Web."
-
Sarah BraxtonFirst Monday article covering the history of the social web...and how it really has been all about commerce.
-
06 Mar 08
-
Josephine Dorado"This essay debunks the myths of the Web 2.0 brand and argues that the popularized phrase limits public media discourse and the imagination of a future World Wide Web."
web2.0 theory socialnetworks socialmedia ParticipatoryCulture collaboration
-
05 Mar 08
-
Howard RheingoldThis essay debunks the myths of the Web 2.0 brand and argues that the popularized phrase limits public media discourse and the imagination of a future World Wide Web.
-
-
The Web 2.0 Ideology, however, goes far beyond the confines of these recent phenomena. It does not solely embrace “a series of ethical assumptions about media, culture, and technology” that worships the creative amateur [5]. This ideology is a framing device of professional elites that define what enters the public discourse about the impact of the Internet on society.
-
-
04 Mar 08
Mark RabnettThis essay debunks the myths of the Web 2.0 brand and argues that the popularized phrase limits public media discourse and the imagination of a future World Wide Web.
-
Ratcatcher"The Web 2.0 épistémè will not just go away. Therefore, it is important to have a clear understanding of its false claims, its ideological embedment, reinforced by professional elites"
-
-
Christian KreutzThis essay debunks the myths of the Web 2.0 brand and argues that the popularized phrase limits public media discourse and the imagination of a future World Wide Web.
Page Comments
source software proponent and multi–millionaire Tim O’Reilly coined the
phrase Web 2.0, together with a colleague. The event producers needed a
catchy title for an upcoming conference. Later, the event title was
expanded into a concept that proposed a separation of various versions
of the Web. “The Internet was back! This shiny new version of the
Internet, the dream of a fully networked, always–connected society was
finally going to be realized. The Internet would democratize Big Media, Big Business, Big Government.”
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.