"Benches easy on city's bottom line - and ours," by Christopher Hume (T.O. Star) - The Diigo Meta page

• 02 Sep 08
  

  Yule Heibel

  Brief article on the benefits of public benches on city sidewalks, and that T.O. has too few of them. Interestingly, this is something that has been bugging me for a while about Victoria, too. Too often, there is literally NO WHERE to sit, even on d/t streets with broad sidewalks. As soon as the street is out of the tourist district or off Government, no more benches. No benches on Fort or on Yates, two streets that are wide and generous in other respects (and the sidewalks are wide enough on Yates, although mingy on Fort). The comments on this article are useful, too.

  thestar christopher_hume toronto cities amenities public_space street_appeal street_usage sidewalks

  • David Miller first got elected mayor all those years ago was his insistence on the public realm, everything from sidewalks and parks to subways and community centres.
  • Miller's argument was that we must create not just a livable city, but one we can fully inhabit. Livability, with overtones of convenience, isn't quite the same as inhabitability, a more all-encompassing term.
  • 6 more annotations...
  • • The inhabitable city is one that can accommodate large numbers of people but which also engages residents at the most personal level. It is the city designed for the individual, not the masses, a dangerous and abstract concept at the best of times.

      • 

        Yule Heibel on 2008-09-02

        I like that distinction between inhabitability for the individual, not the masses...
    • As it turns out, of course, doing one means doing the other. Take care of the individual; take care of the community.
    • In hard-working Toronto, benches – public benches – are for the homeless, the indigent, the addicted, or worse still, the skateboarders. Thus they are a problem to be avoided, provided sparingly and with much disapproval.

    • Most of Toronto's outdoor seating is in cafes and restaurants, but they are private and, therefore, controlled.

      For residents to feel the city belongs to them in a meaningful way, however, they must feel comfortable within it. They must believe themselves safe and secure, not just in the city but of it.

      We must remember that streets aren't simply ways to get from A to B, but are themselves destinations.

      True, our sidewalks tend to be narrow and mean, but we love them anyway and need more ways to enjoy them. The answer, obviously, is benches, benches and more benches. Planners should demand that all buildings of a certain size and use must have benches. All public facilities should have benches, as should corners.

      • 

        Yule Heibel on 2008-09-02

        Yes, corners should have benches.

    • Then the city should focus on trees, which once defined Toronto, and drinking fountains, which used to be ubiquitous. After that, let's look at clocks.

      In these ways, we could enhance our relationship with the city at relatively low cost. Even if Toronto doesn't change, the experience would.

    • We have no benches because our municipal leaders fear the homeless will take them over.
      
      Homelessness must be solved in realistic, humane ways. But denying everyone an attractive city where its people have a place in it, shows the failure of our leadership.

Public Stiky Notes

• 
  Yule Heibel on 2008-09-02
  I like that distinction between inhabitability for the individual, not the masses...
• 
  Yule Heibel on 2008-09-02
  Yes, corners should have benches.

Would you like to comment?

Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.