This link has been bookmarked by 11 people . It was first bookmarked on 04 May 2007, by Mara Linaberger.
-
12 Jan 10
-
07 Oct 09
-
13 Dec 08
-
Lagging far behind our international peers in educational outcomes--and with one of the most unequal educational systems in the industrialized world--we need, I believe, something much more than and much different from what NCLB offers. We badly need a national policy that enables schools to meet the intellectual demands of the twenty-first century.
-
Critics claim that the law's focus on complicated tallies of multiple-choice-test scores has dumbed down the curriculum, fostered a "drill and kill" approach to teaching, mistakenly labeled successful schools as failing, driven teachers and middle-class students out of public schools and harmed special education students and English-language learners through inappropriate assessments and efforts to push out low-scoring students in order to boost scores.
-
-
05 Aug 08
-
17 Mar 08
-
15 May 07
-
07 May 07
Sarah PuglisiI have yet to read this...let me guess...the panel included teachers from throughout the nation especially those who are vocal opponents
-
06 May 07
James Miscavish. What happened? Most discussions focus on the details of the more than 1,000-page law, which has provoked widespread criticism for the myriad issues it has raised. All of its flaws deserve scrutiny in the reauthorization debate, but it's also worth takin
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.