This link has been bookmarked by 17 people . It was first bookmarked on 22 May 2009, by someone privately.
-
20 Oct 09
-
18 Jun 09
-
03 Jun 09
-
02 Jun 09
-
If I was asked, "Why should we continue to use and pursue technology?" I'd start by saying we shouldn't. At least, we shouldn't pursue technology. Above all else, we should pursue learning.
-
-
28 May 09
Diane QuirkReally nice article to keep in your back pocket and help you develop your own thinking about why you do what you do as a staff developer, teacher, administrator...
-
26 May 09
-
23 May 09
-
-
"Shouldn't our students have access to the technologies that allow them to create, collaborate and share their thinking on subjects that matter to them?"
-
They truly understand and can see and hear the impact of their learning and the fact that they have access to technology and the difference it can make. These are kids I want leading in the future. To deny that would be denying the chance for our students to lead the way to better places and people."
-
-
22 May 09
-
Howard RheingoldIn a comment on the original post, Peter Pappas, a former Assistant Superintendent for Instruction, explores the possibility that perhaps our return on investment for technology does not take the form of increased standardized test scores. Peter expounds on what return technology does give us, and he closes his comments by stating, "Shouldn't our students have access to the technologies that allow them to create, collaborate and share their thinking on subjects that matter to them?" I couldn't agree more with Peter.
-
In a comment on the original post, Peter Pappas, a former Assistant Superintendent for Instruction, explores the possibility that perhaps our return on investment for technology does not take the form of increased standardized test scores. Peter expounds on what return technology does give us, and he closes his comments by stating, "Shouldn't our students have access to the technologies that allow them to create, collaborate and share their thinking on subjects that matter to them?" I couldn't agree more with Peter.
-
"One word: affordances. Technology should be adopted/integrated where it affords opportunities that were either not possible without it or where it affords "better"/more efficient ways."
- 1 more annotations...
-
-
Given the choice, would we teach pilots how to fly using a simulator built last year or one built 30 years ago? Would we want our doctors to still use thermometers filled with mercury?
-
-
-
Sarah SutterWhy Technology? Responses from the question Ben Grey asked his PLN/the world.
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.