This link has been bookmarked by 82 people . It was first bookmarked on 13 Jul 2006, by Zhe sto.
-
24 Apr 09
-
24 Mar 08
-
29 Jan 08
-
15 Jan 07
-
12 Nov 06
-
07 Nov 06
-
01 Nov 06
-
24 Oct 06
-
07 Sep 06
-
03 Aug 06
-
25 Jul 06
-
10 Jun 06
-
18 May 06
-
28 Apr 06
-
25 Apr 06
-
06 Apr 06
-
01 Mar 06
David CorkingTim Bray sounds like an Atom apologist. He found more technical advantages for Atom than Ben Hammersley (XML.com) did (5 versus 2)
-
RSS 2.0 may contain either plain text or escaped HTML, with no way to indicate which of the two is provided. Escaped HTML is ugly (for example, the string AT&T can be provided as “AT&T”) and has been a source of difficulty for implementors. RSS 2.0 cannot contain actual well-formed XML markup, which reduces the re-usability of content.
-
-
28 Feb 06
-
23 Jan 06
-
18 Jan 06
retnakierdPeople who generate syndication feeds have a choice of feed formats. As of mid-2005, the two most likely candidates will be RSS 2.0 and Atom 1.0. The purpose of this page is to summarize, as clearly and simply as possible, the differences between the RSS
-
27 Dec 05
-
13 Dec 05
-
01 Dec 05
-
25 Aug 05
-
27 Jul 05
-
25 Jul 05
-
21 Jul 05
-
20 Jul 05
-
19 Jul 05
-
-
People who generate syndication feeds have a choice of feed formats. As of mid-2005, the two most likely candidates will be RSS 2.0 and Atom 1.0. The purpose of this page is to summarize, as clearly and simply as possible, the differences between the RSS 2.0 and Atom 1.0 syndication languages. This document is a snapshot of the live version on the Atom wiki.
-
-
18 Jul 05
-
People who generate syndication feeds have a choice of feed formats. As of mid-2005, the two most likely candidates will be RSS 2.0 and Atom 1.0. The purpose of this page is to summarize, as clearly and simply as possible, the differences between the RSS 2.0 and Atom 1.0 syndication languages.
-
-
Alexandre JunqueiraThe differences between the RSS 2.0 and Atom 1.0 syndication languages
-
17 Jul 05
-
16 Jul 05
-
-
-
-
People who generate syndication feeds have a choice of feed formats. As of mid-2005, the two most likely candidates will be RSS 2.0 and Atom 1.0. The purpose of this page is to summarize, as clearly and simply as possible, the differences between the RSS 2.0 and Atom 1.0 syndication languages.
-
-
15 Jul 05
-
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.