So if it makes you more conformist to identify with your group, does a strong identification result in more productive collaboration or cooperative work? Can mavericks work effectively in groups (for short time periods?)
This link has been bookmarked by 6 people . It was first bookmarked on 06 Dec 2007, by Yukon syl.
-
10 Oct 11
-
25 Feb 11
-
that is, being a
-
social identification.
-
Wilder (1990) manipulated in-group and out-group social identity (1) by having subjects wear badges with the group's name and (2) by putting subjects in a room labeled with the group's name.
-
team and individual.
-
group identity
-
nterdependence
-
individual
-
thinking of self as part of a group and thinking of self as a partner with the computer
-
eam subjects perceived themselves to be affiliated with the computer more than individual subjects did,
-
uccessfully manipulated the subjects' perceptions of social identity.
-
significant behavioral conformity.
-
-
06 Dec 07
-
1982 edited volume Social Identity and Intergroup Behavior
-
Add Sticky Notepeople with group social identity (1) perceive themselves to be more similar to each other (Allen & Wilder, 1975, 1979; Mackie, 1986); (2) are more likely to act cooperatively (Abrams et al., 1990; Back, 1951); (3) feel a stronger need to agree with group opinion (Deutsch & Gerard, 1955; Mackie et al., 1992; Wilder 1990); (4) perceive in-group messages to be of higher quality (Brock, 1965; Mackie et al., 1990); and (5) conform more in both behavior and attitude
-
-
Add Sticky NoteComputers Are Social Actors paradigm (Nass, Steuer & Tauber, 1994
-
Never heard of this - something to pursue for the NewMedia stuff?
-
-
team subjects perceived themselves to be more similar to the computer than did the individual subjects,
-
Add Sticky Noteteam subjects perceived themselves to be more open to influence from the computer than were the individual subjects
-
awareness of social identity?
would have been interesting to know what they thought of their being influenced by the computer
-
-
team subjects perceived the computer's information to be of higher quality than did individual subjects
-
team subjects perceived the information on the computer to be friendlier
-
Add Sticky Notemanipulating human affiliation with a computer is surprisingly easy
-
wow, does that statement trigger alarm bells.
-
-
Public Stiky Notes
would have been interesting to know what they thought of their being influenced by the computer
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.