This link has been bookmarked by 14 people . It was first bookmarked on 16 Jun 2008, by Nancy Hancock.
-
23 Feb 09
-
Is there something special about "carriers" and infrastructure—roads, canals, electric grids, trains, the Internet—that mandates special treatment?
-
it should be neutral in what it carries.
-
to prevent centralized control over the future of the Internet.
-
-
-
When who you know matters more than anything, the market is no longer meritocratic and consequently becomes less efficient. At the extreme, a market where centralized actors pick favorites isn't a market at all, but a planned economy.
-
If allowing network discrimination means being stuck with AT&T's long-term vision of the Internet, it won't be worth it.
-
-
22 Feb 09
-
Rather than try to make the best product, they would battle to make deals with highways.
-
-
21 Feb 09
-
meritocratic
-
to one where deal-making rules
-
lanned economy
-
-
15 Jan 09
-
07 Jul 08
-
16 Jun 08
-
07 Jun 08
Owen Blacker"Would it be a problem if AT&T makes it slower and harder to reach Gmail and quicker and easier to reach Yahoo! mail?". Good introduction to Net Neturality
NetNeutrality reference from:pmog for:openrightsgroup for:becky_hogge for:irisdigital from:delicious
-
11 Jan 07
-
18 Nov 06
alex de carvalhoNone of this is to say that a good network-neutrality rule must be absolute, or even close to absolute. It's an open secret that AT&T and Verizon want to become more like cable television companies. If Verizon wants to build a private network to sell TV,
-
27 May 06
-
04 May 06
flyingkumquatDate: May 1, 2006<br>
By: Tim Wu<br>
Source: Slate
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.