Collaborative Writing - The Diigo Meta page

• 12 Apr 15
  

  pgottsch

  Collaboration DGL Vocab definition

  • What is collaborative authoring or writing? One definition is: activities involved in the production of a document by more than one author, then pre-draft discussions and arguments as well as post-draft analyses and debates are collaborative components. [1] Based on this definition, the collaborative authoring process includes the writing activity as well as group dynamics. Another definition is "...any piece of writing, published or unpublished, ascribed or anonymous, to which more than one person has contributed, whether or not they grasped a pen, tapped a keyboard, or shuffled a mouse." [61] This definition alludes to the complexity of identifying and acknowledging contributions and their contributors.
• 11 Apr 15
  

  miss_min

  collaborative DGL Vocab

  • ...any piece of writing, published or unpublished, ascribed or anonymous, to which more than one person has contributed, whether or not they grasped a pen, tapped a keyboard, or shuffled a mouse." [
• 28 Nov 14
  

  omaldonado96

  definition collaboration vocabulary

  • two or more individuals who work together to produce a single document
• 28 Apr 12
  

  Shannon Ridgeway

  Examples of some of the advantages of collaborative writing

  writing collaboration

• 06 Mar 12
  

  Nicole Carnal

  This site gives examples of how to effectively collaborate with your team. It shows the different roles of each person and how to manage tasks.

  team writing part 1 collaboration

• 26 Feb 12
  

  Nicole Graham

  Definition of collaborative writing

  collaboration writing

  • One definition is: activities involved in the production of a document by more than one author, then pre-draft discussions and arguments as well as post-draft analyses and debates are collaborative components.
  • Based on this definition, the collaborative authoring process includes the writing activity as well as group dynamics

  • The acts of collaboration and writing as they relate to collaborative authoring include: establishing an agenda or goal of the collaboration effort, identifying writing tasks and dividing those tasks among group members, tracking individual idea generation, defining rules for document management, identifying roles for group members, communicating ideas, and managing conflict. Collaborative authoring, therefore, requires effective communication between members of the writing group. 

  1 more annotation...

• 

  Victoria Mintz
• 22 Feb 12
  

  Kate Sloane

  I thought this article was helpful in our group projects.  It's a good start to what we have to write about

• 06 Oct 11
  

  Leah Mosher

  7 organizational patterns for collaborative authoring

  collaboration

• 14 Sep 11
  

  Graidi Ainsworth

  collaboration writing web2.0

• 01 Jul 11
  

  Gregory Wood

  collaboration writing collaborative writing roles tasks process

• 19 Jan 10
  

  Kyle Murley

  web20 collaboration wiki education writing

• 23 May 09
  

  Ruth Okoye

  collaboration writing inservice_planning collaborativewriting

• 16 Apr 09
  

  Celeste Hopkins

  web2.0 education collaboration wiki writing

• 15 Apr 09
  

  Sharon Ellner

  collaboration web2.0 wiki writing

• 

  lloutback

  collaboration web2.0 writing wiki research

• 03 Nov 08
  

  Jon Orech

  education wiki collaboration writing WEb2.0

• 24 Apr 07
  

  collaboration writing education nite_writing

• 25 Mar 07
  
  • Collaborative Writing
• 

  Clay Burell

  wiki web2.0 education writing writing_process collaboration

  •  Survey one, which was administered to a large group of writers (approximately 800), provides information on the amount of time spent on the various phases of the writing process. The results show that generating ideas (14%), note-taking (13%), organizational planning (13%), drafting (32%), revising (15%), editing (13%) contribute to the total writing process. Ede and Lunsford [39] also examined co 

     llaborative authoring and the results  indicates that the level of satisfaction in the group writing process is influenced by eight items: 

     
    • the degree to which goals are articulated and shared;  
    • the degree of openness and mutual respect; 
    • the degree of control the writers have over the text;  
    • the degree to which writers can respond to others who modify the text;  
    • the way in which credit (directly or indirectly) is acknowledged; 
    • the presence of an agreed upon procedure for managing conflicts and  resolving disputes; 
    • the number and types of (bureaucratic) constraints imposed on the authors-- deadlines, technical/legal requirements, etc., and; 
    • the status of the project within the organization.

    • Again, interesting for wiki-based projects.&nbsp; The percentages of total project time taken by each phase of the writing process is especially relevant to the student-created wiki textbook project I'm launching in my history class this week.<br>
    Add Sticky Note

  •  Based on the results of the study conducted by Ede and Lunsford [39], seven organizational patterns for collaborative authoring were identified. These patterns are:

    1. the team plans and outlines the task, then each writer prepares his/her part and the group compiles the individual parts, and revises the whole document as needed; 
    2. the team plans and outlines the writing task, then one member prepares a draft, the team edits and revises the draft;
    3. one member of the team plans and writes a draft, the group revises the draft;
    4. one person plans and writes the draft, then one or more members revises the draft without consulting the original authors;
    5. the group plans and writes  the draft, one or more members revise the draft without consulting the original authors;
    6. one person assigns the tasks, each member completes the individual task, one person compiles and revises the document;
    7.  one dictates, another transcribes and edits. Results from the study indicated that the percentage of writing groups that use these methods often or very often range from 3% (method 5) to 31% (method 3).

    • Interesting research on collaborative writing models.&nbsp; Obvious relevance to classroom wiki workshop designs and roles.<br>
    Add Sticky Note

Public Stiky Notes

• 
  Clay Burell on 2007-03-25
  Again, interesting for wiki-based projects.  The percentages of total project time taken by each phase of the writing process is especially relevant to the student-created wiki textbook project I'm launching in my history class this week.
  
• 
  Clay Burell on 2007-03-25
  Interesting research on collaborative writing models.  Obvious relevance to classroom wiki workshop designs and roles.
  

Would you like to comment?

Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.