Group annotations on this page
-
research by Nate Kornell, Matthew Hays and Robert Bjork at U.C.L.A. that recently appeared in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition reveals that this worry is misplaced. In fact, they found, learning becomes better if conditions are arranged so that students make errors.
-
People remember things better, longer, if they are given very challenging tests on the material, tests at which they are bound to fail. In a series of experiments, they showed that if students make an unsuccessful attempt to retrieve information before receiving an answer, they remember the information better than in a control condition in which they simply study the information. Trying and failing to retrieve the answer is actually helpful to learning. It’s an idea that has obvious applications for education, but could be useful for anyone who is trying to learn new material of any kind.
-
teromakotero on 2009-10-25Research by Nate Kornell, Matthew Hays and Robert Bjork at U.C.L.A. that recently appeared in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition reveals that this worry is misplaced. In fact, they found, learning becomes better if conditions are arranged so that students make errors.
This link has been bookmarked by 48 people . It was first bookmarked on 20 Oct 2009, by Isk Aldur.
-
29 Nov 09
-
20 Nov 09
athena prestonNew research makes the case for hard tests, and suggests an unusual technique that anyone can use to learn
-
16 Nov 09
-
29 Oct 09
Lawrence SheltonThe latter part suggests simple strategies for increasing learning.
-
Bob Rowanshared by Kathy Walker/Magi Koch, 10/29/2009, "In light of several conversations we’ve had this year about encouraging kids to allow themselves to make mistakes, this article has a pretty interesting take on the value of mistake sin learning."
-
learning becomes better if conditions are arranged so that students make errors
-
-
28 Oct 09
-
26 Oct 09
Bonnie LeeNew research makes the case for hard tests, and suggests an unusual technique that anyone can use to learn
-
25 Oct 09
-
Tero ToivanenResearch by Nate Kornell, Matthew Hays and Robert Bjork at U.C.L.A. that recently appeared in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition reveals that this worry is misplaced. In fact, they found, learning becomes better if conditions are arranged so that students make errors.
-
research by Nate Kornell, Matthew Hays and Robert Bjork at U.C.L.A. that recently appeared in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition reveals that this worry is misplaced. In fact, they found, learning becomes better if conditions are arranged so that students make errors.
-
People remember things better, longer, if they are given very challenging tests on the material, tests at which they are bound to fail. In a series of experiments, they showed that if students make an unsuccessful attempt to retrieve information before receiving an answer, they remember the information better than in a control condition in which they simply study the information. Trying and failing to retrieve the answer is actually helpful to learning. It’s an idea that has obvious applications for education, but could be useful for anyone who is trying to learn new material of any kind.
-
-
24 Oct 09
-
-
People remember things better, longer, if they are given very challenging tests on the material, tests at which they are bound to fail. In a series of experiments, they showed that if students make an unsuccessful attempt to retrieve information before receiving an answer, they remember the information better than in a control condition in which they simply study the information. Trying and failing to retrieve the answer is actually helpful to learning.
-
-
23 Oct 09
Jon MarshallGreat article on learning through failure! Share with AP Psych students.
-
Arne van ElkJe onthoudt zaken beter wanneer je er eerst flink ZELF mee aan de slag gaat en fouten maakt, dan wanneer je het goede antwoord op een presenteerblaadje krijgt. Is dat nieuw?
-
The idea embedded in this approach is that if students make errors, they will learn the errors and be prevented (or slowed) in learning the correct information. But research by Nate Kornell, Matthew Hays and Robert Bjork at U.C.L.A. that recently appeared in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition reveals that this worry is misplaced. In fact, they found, learning becomes better if conditions are arranged so that students make errors.
People remember things better, longer, if they are given very challenging tests on the material, tests at which they are bound to fail. In a series of experiments, they showed that if students make an unsuccessful attempt to retrieve information before receiving an answer, they remember the information better than in a control condition in which they simply study the information. Trying and failing to retrieve the answer is actually helpful to learning. It’s an idea that has obvious applications for education, but could be useful for anyone who is trying to learn new material of any kind.
-
-
22 Oct 09
-
Carol FurchnerGet it wrong to get it right - trying to guess an answer before you study the material improves later retention, at least for some types of materials
-
In a series of experiments, they showed that if students make an unsuccessful attempt to retrieve information before receiving an answer, they remember the information better than in a control condition in which they simply study the information. Trying and failing to retrieve the answer is actually helpful to learning.
-
-
-
People remember things better, longer, if they are given very challenging tests on the material, tests at which they are bound to fail. In a series of experiments, they showed that if students make an unsuccessful attempt to retrieve information before receiving an answer, they remember the information better than in a control condition in which they simply study the information. Trying and failing to retrieve the answer is actually helpful to learning. It’s an idea that has obvious applications for education, but could be useful for anyone who is trying to learn new material of any kind.
-
-
LeoNew research makes the case for hard tests, and suggests an unusual technique that anyone can use to learn
-
-
Trying and failing to retrieve the answer is actually helpful to learning. It’s an idea that has obvious applications for education, but could be useful for anyone who is trying to learn new material of any kind.
-
-
-
But research by Nate Kornell, Matthew Hays and Robert Bjork at U.C.L.A. that recently appeared in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition reveals that this worry is misplaced. In fact, they found, learning becomes better if conditions are arranged so that students make errors.
-
In fact, they found, learning becomes better if conditions are arranged so that students make errors
- 1 more annotations...
-
-
People remember things better, longer, if they are given very challenging tests on the material, tests at which they are bound to fail.
-
-
-
21 Oct 09
-
Roger ZuidemaNew research makes the case for hard tests, and suggests an unusual technique that anyone can use to learn
-
20 Oct 09
barb dybwad"The idea embedded in this approach is that if students make errors, they will learn the errors and be prevented (or slowed) in learning the correct information. But research by Nate Kornell, Matthew Hays and Robert Bjork at U.C.L.A. that recently appeared in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition reveals that this worry is misplaced. In fact, they found, learning becomes better if conditions are arranged so that students make errors."
-
Shrutarshi Basu"New research makes the case for hard tests, and suggests an unusual technique that anyone can use to learn"
Page Comments
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.