No True "mod_ruby" Is Damaging Ruby's Viability On The Web - The Diigo Meta page

• 21 Jan 08
  

  harry

  quickd

  • he reason is that applications built around these frameworks tend to expose themselves directly via HTTP daemons, using libraries such as Mongrel or WEBrick, and then requests from Web servers like Apache need to be proxied through to them, but this feels like a hackish workaround to the fact we lack a proper "mod_ruby."

  • ) Is there / why isn't there a version of mod_ruby that doesn't have the "class sharing" issue? What is the technical impediment?

     

    2) Is there any immutable reason that Ruby apps couldn't, in the future, be deployed in a PHP-esque fashion?
• 18 Jan 08
  

  ratbeard

  rails ruby web

• 11 Jan 08
  

  Bruce Healy

  litespeed rails rubyonrails shared hosting deployment web Server webserver apache

Page Comments

• 
  ratbeard on 2008-01-18
  Great comments about how to deploy rails applications.  The shared hosting situation sounds pretty grim :/
  
  
  

Would you like to comment?

Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.