This link has been bookmarked by 95 people . It was first bookmarked on 29 Mar 2008, by Joel Liu.
-
-
Most intellectual dishonesty is
unintentional. Someone arguing against the tone of something he
disagrees with may believe he's really saying something. Zooming
out and seeing his current position on the disagreement hierarchy
may inspire him to try moving up to counterargument or refutation.
-
-
Jonathan TepperAn essay that gives tips on how to structure online debate to avoid lack of etiquette.
-
The web is turning writing into a conversation. Twenty years ago,
writers wrote and readers read. The web lets readers respond, and
increasingly they do—in comment threads, on forums, and in their
own blog posts. -
Now we have a way of classifying forms of disagreement. What good
is it? One thing the disagreement hierarchy doesn't give us is
a way of picking a winner. DH levels merely describe the form of
a statement, not whether it's correct. A DH6 response could still
be completely mistaken.
-
-
Simon BricoloLes différentes manières de ne pas être d'accord avec quelqu'un (par écrit, mais également valable oralement)
-
J RiceAn essay about the hierarchy of forms of disagreement.
-
arllennium arllenniumTitle self-explanatory
-
David Feld"If we're all going to be disagreeing more, we should be careful to do it well. ... Most readers can tell the difference between mere name-calling and a carefully reasoned refutation, but I think it would help to put names on the intermediate stages."
-
richbro61Discusses a hierarchy of ways to disagree, e.g., on the internet in blog conversations -- and argues that choosing methods higher up on the hierarchy makes everyone happier....
-
Art GelwicksDiscusses a hierarchy of ways to disagree, e.g., on the internet in blog conversations -- and argues that choosing methods higher up on the hierarchy makes everyone happier....
-
March 2008
The web is turning writing into a conversation. Twenty years ago,
writers wrote and readers read. The web lets readers respond, and
increasingly they do—in comment threads, on forums, and in their
own blog posts. -
The result is there's a lot more disagreeing going on, especially
measured by the word. - 9 more annotations...
-
-
pearl tDiscusses a hierarchy of ways to disagree, e.g., on the internet in blog conversations -- and argues that choosing methods higher up on the hierarchy makes everyone happier....
-
March 2008
The web is turning writing into a conversation. Twenty years ago,
writers wrote and readers read. The web lets readers respond, and
increasingly they do—in comment threads, on forums, and in their
own blog posts. -
The result is there's a lot more disagreeing going on, especially
measured by the word. - 9 more annotations...
-
-
Katie DayDiscusses a hierarchy of ways to disagree, e.g., on the internet in blog conversations -- and argues that choosing methods higher up on the hierarchy makes everyone happier....
-
March 2008
The web is turning writing into a conversation. Twenty years ago,
writers wrote and readers read. The web lets readers respond, and
increasingly they do—in comment threads, on forums, and in their
own blog posts. -
The result is there's a lot more disagreeing going on, especially
measured by the word. - 9 more annotations...
-
-
-
name-calling
-
-
-
The force of a refutation depends on what you refute. The most
powerful form of disagreement is to refute someone's central point -
Truly refuting something requires one to refute its central point,
or at least one of them - 1 more annotations...
-
-
Owen MathewsA neat treatise on web discourse and how to argue intellectually. Defines a hierarchy of disagreement from name-calling attacks to identifying the central point of an argument and refuting it with evidence.
-
-
DH0. Name-calling.
-
DH1. Ad Hominem.
- 1 more annotations...
-
-
Steven KayeCondescending, but still useful
-
rampionclassification of various levels of disagreement
-
Jeff WassermanNifty article on a hierarchy of the different ways to disagree!
-
Bill HIn presenting an argument there are three ore elements: the author; the written/oral argument; the idea or concept being argued. In presenting an argument against the point there are 7 forms of attack.
On the author:
1. question the author's ability
2. question the author's motivation (conflict of interest)
On the written/oral form:
3. question to the tone, style, literacy of the writting
On the concept:
4. state a conflicting point (unsubstanciated)
5. state a counter argument
6. refute a tangential point
7. refute the central point of the argument-
DH0. Name-calling.
-
DH1. Ad Hominem
- 5 more annotations...
-
-
Sarah Puglisihierarchy of different ways to disagree
-
Jeremy Brownhierarchy of different ways to disagree
-
Clay BurellGood "disagreement heirarchy" to share with students re: commenting and netiquette (and critical thinking).
-
Paul RussellAn essay on they forms and effectiveness of different types of written disagreement. I found this an interesting tool for analyzing and preparing online debate.
-
FruFru FourOne"What does it mean to disagree well? Most readers can tell the difference between mere name-calling and a carefully reasoned refutation, but I think it would help to put names on the intermediate stages. So here's an attempt at a disagreement hierarchy"
-
Nishant MehtaNifty article on a hierarchy of the different ways to disagree!
-
Will BoltonAn attempt to classify forms of disagreement. Could be utilised for some kind of blog comment user rating system.
-
Miriam SchwabThe blogosphere is about reacting to what other people say. A lot of the time, those reactions are in the form of disagreements. This article explains how to disagree in a polite and civil manner. Very important.
-
Roger ChenThe web is turning writing into a conversation. Twenty years ago, writers wrote and readers read. The web lets readers respond, and increasingly they do—in comment threads, on forums, and in their own blog posts.
-
When you disagree you're entering
territory he may not have explored.
-
-
paul reidThe web is turning writing into a conversation. Twenty years ago, writers wrote and readers read. The web lets readers respond, and increasingly they do—in comment threads, on forums, and in their own blog posts.
-
-
This is the lowest form of disagreement, and probably also the most
common. We've all seen comments like this:
u r a fag!!!!!!!!!!
-
-
Jay DuggerA hierarchy of disagreement types (DH0-DH6): name-calling, ad hominem. responding to tone, contradiction, counterargument, refutation, and refuting the central point.
-
-
The author is a self-important dilettante.
is really nothing more than a pretentious version of "u r a fag." -
because
good ideas often come from outsiders - 6 more annotations...
-
Page Comments
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.