Skip to main content

Diigo Home

Op-Contributor - End the University as We Know It - Op-Ed - NYTimes.com - The Diigo Meta page

www.nytimes.com/...27taylor.html - Cached - Annotated View

Sorry, this URL cannot be previewed here. Visit the URL directly.

Carlos Santos's personal annotations on this page

carlos_santos
  • The dirty secret of higher education is that without underpaid graduate students to help in laboratories and with teaching, universities couldn’t conduct research or even instruct their growing undergraduate populations. That’s one of the main reasons we still encourage people to enroll in doctoral programs. It is simply cheaper to provide graduate students with modest stipends and adjuncts with as little as $5,000 a course — with no benefits — than it is to hire full-time professors.

    In other words, young people enroll in graduate programs, work hard for subsistence pay and assume huge debt burdens, all because of the illusory promise of faculty appointments. But their economical presence, coupled with the intransigence of tenure, ensures that there will always be too many candidates for too few openings.

This link has been bookmarked by 9 people . It was first bookmarked on 27 Apr 2009, by Carlos Santos.

  • 24 Aug 09
  • 21 Jul 09
    • The dirty secret of higher education is that without underpaid graduate students to help in laboratories and with teaching, universities couldn’t conduct research or even instruct their growing undergraduate populations.
  • 01 May 09
  • 29 Apr 09
    dougpete
    Doug Peterson

    Most graduate programs in American universities produce a product for which there is no market (candidates for teaching positions that do not exist) and develop skills for which there is diminishing demand (research in subfields within subfields and publi

    education teaching research blog blogging blogs publishing socialmedia university

  • 28 Apr 09
  • 27 Apr 09
    • The dirty secret of higher education is that without underpaid graduate students to help in laboratories and with teaching, universities couldn’t conduct research or even instruct their growing undergraduate populations. That’s one of the main reasons we still encourage people to enroll in doctoral programs. It is simply cheaper to provide graduate students with modest stipends and adjuncts with as little as $5,000 a course — with no benefits — than it is to hire full-time professors.

      In other words, young people enroll in graduate programs, work hard for subsistence pay and assume huge debt burdens, all because of the illusory promise of faculty appointments. But their economical presence, coupled with the intransigence of tenure, ensures that there will always be too many candidates for too few openings.