Skip to main content

Diigo Home

Op-Ed Contributors - How to Repair a Broken Financial World - NYTimes.com - The Diigo Meta page

www.nytimes.com/...04lewiseinhornb.html - Cached - Annotated View

Sorry, this URL cannot be previewed here. Visit the URL directly.

Frank Colcord's personal annotations on this page

colcord
Colcord bookmarked on 2009-01-21 System Dynamics Cui bono Economics
  • How to Repair a Broken Financial World

This link has been bookmarked by 10 people . It was first bookmarked on 04 Jan 2009, by raman srinivasan.

  • 31 Mar 09
  • 21 Jan 09
    • How to Repair a Broken Financial World
  • 10 Jan 09
  • 06 Jan 09
    marccharpentier
    Marc Charpentier

    By MICHAEL LEWIS and DAVID EINHORN

    Economics Society

    • In its latest push to compel confidence, for instance, the authorities are placing enormous pressure on the Financial Accounting Standards Board to suspend “mark-to-market” accounting. Basically, this means that the banks will not have to account for the actual value of the assets on their books but can claim instead that they are worth whatever they paid for them.
    • reducing transparency and increasing self-delusion
  • 05 Jan 09
  • 04 Jan 09
    • This is more plausible than it may sound. Sweden, of all places, did it
      successfully in 1992. And remember, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury have
      already accepted, on behalf of the taxpayer, just about all of the downside risk
      of owning the bigger financial firms. The Treasury and the Federal Reserve would
      both no doubt argue that if you don’t prop up these banks you risk an enormous
      credit contraction — if they aren’t in business who will be left to lend money?
      But something like the reverse seems more true: propping up failed banks and
      extending them huge amounts of credit has made business more difficult for the
      people and companies that had nothing to do with creating the mess. Perfectly
      solvent companies are being squeezed out of business by their creditors
      precisely because they are not in the Treasury’s fold. With so much lending
      effectively federally guaranteed, lenders are fleeing anything that is not.


      Rather than tackle the source of the problem, the people running the bailout
      desperately want to reinflate the credit bubble, prop up the stock market and
      head off a recession. Their efforts are clearly failing: 2008 was a historically
      bad year for the stock market, and we’ll be in recession for some time to come.
      Our leaders have framed the problem as a “crisis of confidence” but what they
      actually seem to mean is “please pay no attention to the problems we are failing
      to address.”


      In its latest push to compel confidence, for instance, the authorities are
      placing enormous pressure on the Financial Accounting Standards Board to suspend
      “mark-to-market” accounting. Basically, this means that the banks will not have
      to account for the actual value of the assets on their books but can claim
      instead that they are worth whatever they paid for them.


      This will have the double effect of reducing transparency and increasing
      self-delusion (gorge yourself for months, but refuse to step on a scale, and
      maybe no one will realize you gained weight). And it will fool no one. When you
      shout at people “be confident,” you shouldn’t expect them to be anything but
      terrified.

    • But keep the door open the other way. If the S.E.C.
      is to restore its credibility as an investor protection agency, it should have
      some experienced, respected investors (which is not the same thing as investment
      bankers) as commissioners. President-elect Barack Obama should nominate at least
      one with a notable career investing capital, and another with experience
      uncovering corporate misconduct. As it happens, the most critical job, chief of
      enforcement, now has a perfect candidate, a civic-minded former investor with
      firsthand experience of the S.E.C.’s ineptitude: Harry Markopolos.


      The funny thing is, there’s nothing all that radical about most of these
      changes. A disinterested person would probably wonder why many of them had not
      been made long ago. A committee of people whose financial interests are somehow
      bound up with Wall Street is a different matter.