This link has been bookmarked by 14 people . It was first bookmarked on 08 Mar 2007, by Robert A Gagnon.
-
29 Mar 09
-
01 May 07
-
Do the Impossible: Know Thyself by Theodore Dalrymple (March 2007) I attended a fascinating conference on neuropsychiatry recently. Neuroscience, it seems to me, is the current most hopeful candidate for the role of putative but delusory answer to all Mankind's deepest questions: what is Man's place in Nature, and how should he live. What is the good life, at least in the western world?
-
Do the Impossible: Know Thyself by Theodore Dalrymple (March 2007) I attended a fascinating conference on neuropsychiatry recently. Neuroscience, it seems to me, is the current most hopeful candidate for the role of putative but delusory answer to all Mankind's deepest questions: what is Man's place in Nature, and how should he live. What is the good life, at least in the western world?
-
-
27 Apr 07
-
15 Mar 07
-
Nothing is important or significant but conscious thinking makes it so: the type of thinking, moreover, that employs moral categories that are inherently non-natural.
-
How does one develop a universal law that explains an infinite number of unique events that are infused with meaning and intentionality?
-
difficult even to conceive of what a scientific self-understanding would actually be like
-
Two main questions arose in my mind during the neuropsychiatric conference. The first was whether any scientific self-understanding was possible. The second was whether, if possible, it was desirable. My answer to both questions was, and is, no.
-
already been answered
-
The fact is that, however many factors you examine, you cannot fully explain behaviour, not even relatively simple behaviour.
-
-
11 Mar 07
Daniel PoynterRespected neuroscientist doubts neuroscience advances will lead to "enlightenment" on the self question
-
10 Mar 07
Alberto FernandezI attended a fascinating conference on neuropsychiatry recently. Neuroscience, it seems to me, is the current most hopeful candidate for the role of putative but delusory answer to all Mankind's deepest questions: what is Man's place in Nature, and how sh
-
09 Mar 07
diigodeli dunbarA neuroscientist might reply that he is not trying to develop a theory that explains everything in detail, but only in general: that is to say, to explain the important and significant generalities of human thought, feeling and conduct. But on a purely sc
article neuroscience interesting philosophy psychology knowledge
-
08 Mar 07
Jason Campbell"Two main questions arose in my mind during the neuropsychiatric conference. The first was whether any scientific self-understanding was possible. The second was whether, if possible, it was desirable. My answer to both questions was, and is, no."
-
-
In my opinion, the great philosopher David Hume understood why human self-understanding was forever beyond our reach. It is not a coincidence that he always expressed himself with irony, for the deepest irony possible is that of the existence of a creature, Man, who forever seeks something that is beyond his understanding.
Hume was simultaneously a figure of the enlightenment and the anti-enlightenment. He saw that reason and consideration of the evidence are all that a rational man can rely upon, yet they are eternally insufficient for Man as he is situated. In short, there cannot be such a thing as the wholly rational man. Reason, he said, is the slave of the passions; and in addition, no statement of value follows logically from any statement of fact. But we cannot live without evaluations.
Ergo, self-understanding is not around the corner and never will be. We shall never be able seamlessly to join knowledge and action. To which I add, not in any religious sense: thank God.
-
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.