Bertrand Duperrin's personal annotations on this page
Bertrandduperrin bookmarked
on 2009-01-09
The bomb that has blown up the heart of the world's financial system was not primarily financial. It's true that finance provided the high explosive in the shape of the structured vehicles, collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) and derivatives devised by the rocket scientists of Wall Street and the City. But it needed a detonator to set them off: the unfit-for-purpose management model that has governed the way our companies work for the last 40 years.
-
This is the challenge for Management 2.0: reorienting management from
compliance to creativity, from flogging efficiencies out of existing
resources to generating new ones, from zero-sum to positive-sum by
recognising, as Hamel says, the commonsense proposition that in the long
term the corporation can only prosper if employees, suppliers, the
community and indeed the planet do too. -
First, many of the 'grand challenges' put forward in the discussions -
the need for companies to articulate a purpose beyond making money (a
conference near-consensus), distributed leadership and strategy- making,
the fostering of community and citizenship, building trust - are not new
at all. It's more that they have been driven to the periphery of
management concerns by the treadmill of Management 1.0. -
There are
plenty of others. The granddaddy of Management 2.0 firms is Toyota, the
exactly reversed image of GM: employing market pull rather than
marketing push, economies of scope rather than scale, putting workers
rather than computers in control of the work. -
What do such companies have in common? First, incorporation of broader
societal concerns. -
Second, they have a determination to make their own rules.
-
Third, governance for them is based on strong internal values rather
than an external rulebook. -
Fourth is trust - an abused word, but without which no lasting
relationship is possible. -
Finally, there's a preference for intrinsic reward - the work itself -
over extrinsic reward. -
This list is not exclusive: finding ways to break the dead hand of
conventional budgeting and performance management is high on the
Management 2.0 agenda.
This link has been bookmarked by 1 people . It was first bookmarked on 09 Jan 2009, by Bertrand Duperrin.
-
Bertrand Duperrin
The bomb that has blown up the heart of the world's financial system was not primarily financial. It's true that finance provided the high explosive in the shape of the structured vehicles, collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) and derivatives devised by the rocket scientists of Wall Street and the City. But it needed a detonator to set them off: the unfit-for-purpose management model that has governed the way our companies work for the last 40 years.
-
This is the challenge for Management 2.0: reorienting management from
compliance to creativity, from flogging efficiencies out of existing
resources to generating new ones, from zero-sum to positive-sum by
recognising, as Hamel says, the commonsense proposition that in the long
term the corporation can only prosper if employees, suppliers, the
community and indeed the planet do too. -
First, many of the 'grand challenges' put forward in the discussions -
the need for companies to articulate a purpose beyond making money (a
conference near-consensus), distributed leadership and strategy- making,
the fostering of community and citizenship, building trust - are not new
at all. It's more that they have been driven to the periphery of
management concerns by the treadmill of Management 1.0. - 7 more annotations...
-
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.