This link has been bookmarked by 72 people . It was first bookmarked on 02 Mar 2006, by Torsten Rox-Edling.
-
15 Mar 14
-
27 Nov 12
-
18 Jun 08
-
15 Jun 08
-
28 Feb 08
-
22 Jan 08
-
taxonomy is the first ingredient of success
-
Feedback
-
Feedback
-
Feedback
-
-
11 Dec 07
-
13 Aug 07
-
05 Jun 07
-
05 Dec 06
-
06 Nov 06
-
25 Oct 06
-
02 Aug 06
-
31 Jul 06
-
25 Jul 06
-
31 Mar 06
-
26 Mar 06
-
Lambert Heller"these systems bind the assignment of tags to their use — in a tight feedback loop (...). Feedback is immediate. As soon as you assign a tag to an item, you see the cluster of items carrying the same tag."
! hivemind knowledgemanagement socialbookmarking folksonomies feedback_loop intranet lang:en year:2004 gbv2013
-
22 Mar 06
-
04 Mar 06
-
20 Dec 05
Chris ChesherAugust 2004 article by Jon Udell referring (in passing) to 'knowledge gardening'.
del.icio.us flickr knowledge gardening SSHERI presentation 05
-
It’s easy to perform queries that combine tags. Armed with such powerful tools, people can collectively enrich shared data. But will they? The success of Flickr and del.icio.us won’t necessarily translate to the intranet. You can import the global-hive mind, but you can’t export the local-hive mind. That asymmetry defines the challenge we face as enterprise knowledge gardeners.
-
-
linkmess| InfoWorld | Column | 2004-08-20 | By Jon Udell. The "gardening" word hints at a sort of emergent payback to an initial input. I'm not sure tagging and creating folksonomies leverages anywhere near enough emergence to live up to the idea of gardening. Tr
-
17 Nov 05
-
28 Sep 05
-
01 Aug 05
-
16 Jun 05
-
31 May 05
-
collaborative systems for building a shared database of items, developing a metadata vocabulary about the items, performing metadata-driven queries, and monitoring change in areas of interest.
-
-
17 May 05
-
26 Feb 05
-
10 Feb 05
-
20 Jan 05
-
12 Jan 05
-
11 Jan 05
-
04 Jan 05
Artem SNext month I’ll be giving a talk on social software to an audience of CTOs. To prime the pump, I’ve been spending some time with two of the newer services in the space: Flickr and del.icio.us. Neither focuses primarily on the six-degrees-of-separation
-
01 Jan 05
-
Collaborative knowledge gardening With Flickr and del.icio.us, social networking goes beyond sharing contacts and connections
-
Collaborative knowledge gardening With Flickr and del.icio.us, social networking goes beyond sharing contacts and connections
-
Collaborative knowledge gardening With Flickr and del.icio.us, social networking goes beyond sharing contacts and connections
-
-
23 Dec 04
-
14 Dec 04
-
With Flickr and del.icio.us, social networking goes beyond sharing contacts and connections
-
With Flickr and del.icio.us, social networking goes beyond sharing contacts and connections
-
With Flickr and del.icio.us, social networking goes beyond sharing contacts and connections
-
-
10 Dec 04
-
21 Oct 04
-
12 Oct 04
-
09 Oct 04
-
07 Oct 04
Alan LevineInfoWorld: August 20, 2004: By Jon Udell
del.icio.us semanticweb social software tagging wikipedia hznmc hz07 user_content
-
01 Oct 04
Seb Paquetthese systems bind the assignment of tags to their use — in a tight feedback loop
-
10 Sep 04
Are Halland"With Flickr and del.icio.us, social networking goes beyond sharing contacts and connections"
-
08 Sep 04
-
06 Sep 04
-
luistxoWith Flickr and del.icio.us, social networking goes beyond sharing contacts and connections
-
04 Sep 04
-
The success of Flickr and del.icio.us won’t necessarily translate to the intranet. You can import the global-hive mind, but you can’t export the local-hive mind.
-
The success of Flickr and del.icio.us won’t necessarily translate to the intranet. You can import the global-hive mind, but you can’t export the local-hive mind.
-
The success of Flickr and del.icio.us won’t necessarily translate to the intranet. You can import the global-hive mind, but you can’t export the local-hive mind.
-
-
30 Aug 04
-
26 Aug 04
-
-
I’d say that both are collaborative systems for building a shared database of items, developing a metadata vocabulary about the items, performing metadata-driven queries, and monitoring change in areas of interest. In the case of Flickr, an item is a photo; in the case of del.icio.us, it’s a URL. But the same methods could apply to any of the shared digital artifacts that we create, find, and use in the course of our daily work. ... (Somehow), users of Flickr and del.icio.us do routinely tag content, and those tags open new dimensions of navigation and search. It’s worth pondering how and why this works. Abandoning taxonomy is the first ingredient of success. These systems just use bags of keywords that draw from — and extend — a flat namespace. In other words, you tag an item with a list of existing and/or new keywords. Of course, that idea’s been around for decades, so what’s special about Flickr and del.icio.us? Sometimes a difference in degree becomes a difference in kind. The degree to which these systems bind the assignment of tags to their use — in a tight feedback loop — is that kind of difference. Feedback is immediate. As soon as you assign a tag to an item, you see the cluster of items carrying the same tag. If that’s not what you expected, you’re given incentive to change the tag or add another.
-
I’d say that both are collaborative systems for building a shared database of items, developing a metadata vocabulary about the items, performing metadata-driven queries, and monitoring change in areas of interest. In the case of Flickr, an item is a photo; in the case of del.icio.us, it’s a URL. But the same methods could apply to any of the shared digital artifacts that we create, find, and use in the course of our daily work. ... (Somehow), users of Flickr and del.icio.us do routinely tag content, and those tags open new dimensions of navigation and search. It’s worth pondering how and why this works. Abandoning taxonomy is the first ingredient of success. These systems just use bags of keywords that draw from — and extend — a flat namespace. In other words, you tag an item with a list of existing and/or new keywords. Of course, that idea’s been around for decades, so what’s special about Flickr and del.icio.us? Sometimes a difference in degree becomes a difference in kind. The degree to which these systems bind the assignment of tags to their use — in a tight feedback loop — is that kind of difference. Feedback is immediate. As soon as you assign a tag to an item, you see the cluster of items carrying the same tag. If that’s not what you expected, you’re given incentive to change the tag or add another.
-
-
25 Aug 04
-
As soon as you assign a tag to an item, you see the cluster of items carrying the same tag. If that’s not what you expected, you’re given incentive to change the tag or add another. If your items aren’t confidential and online-only access is sufficient, this can be a great way to manage personal information. But the real power emerges when you expand the scope to include all items, from all users, that match your tag. Again, that view might not be what you expected. In that case, you can adapt to the group norm, keep your tag in a bid to influence the group norm, or both.
-
-
24 Aug 04
-
23 Aug 04
-
21 Aug 04
-
SibiPoortmanNext month I’ll be giving a talk on social software to an audience of CTOs. To prime the pump, I’ve been spending some time with two of the newer services in the space: Flickr and del.icio.us. Neither focuses primarily on the six-degrees-of-separation
-
Feedback is immediate. As soon as you assign a tag to an item, you see the cluster of items carrying the same tag. If that’s not what you expected, you’re given incentive to change the tag or add another.
-
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.