Skip to main content

Diigo Home

Ch 24 Page 175: Sustainable Energy - without the hot air - The Diigo Meta page

www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/...page_175.shtml - Cached - Annotated View

Group annotations on this page

od energy group read
  • The nuclear decommissioning authority has an annual budget of £2 billion. In fact, this clean-up budget seems to rise

    and rise. The latest figure for the total cost of decommissioning is £73 billion. news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7215688.stm
    • casaba
      Casaba on 2009-08-21
      Now why is this nearly 50% increase over the value quoted in the text tucked into the endnotes? If the text were emphasizing how great a cost this was, the end notes might be appropriate. However, the text main point is that it is a smaller 'subsidy' than that given wind generation.
    • djcmackay
      Djcmackay on 2009-08-24
      I added an erratum to the book trying to improve the accuracy of my discussion of the cost of nuclear decommissioning: my error was that I attributed the nuclear decomm. cost to civilian electricity generation, but in fact the lion's share of the clean-up cost is for military mess. C.Duro then posted a comment disputing this fact and accusing me of dishonest presentation. I stand by the fact: I got this same erratum twice from two independent sources, then checked it, and I don't think that the Telegraph article cited by C.Duro disproves the erratum. The lion's share (ie more than half) of the cost is for military clean-up.

Public Stiky Notes

  • casaba
    Ché Duro on 2009-08-14
    Now why is this nearly 50% increase over the value quoted in the text tucked into the endnotes? If the text were emphasizing how great a cost this was, the end notes might be appropriate. However, the text main point is that it is a smaller 'subsidy' than that given wind generation.

    Would you like to comment?

    Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.