Basics: What animals are used for testing with.
This link has been bookmarked by 38 people . It was first bookmarked on 02 Jan 2008, by windhamms.
-
05 Apr 11
-
23 Mar 11
-
21 May 10
-
04 May 10
-
28 Apr 10
-
15 Apr 10
-
has provided a list of factsheets on the testing of chemicals, cosmetics, endocrine disruptors, food
-
-
14 Apr 10
Lifan FAnimal testing humane society of the united states 4/14/10- 11:10
-
A large number of laws and regulations have been enacted to control the marketing of drugs, cosmetics, pesticides, food additives, and other products that could prove to be hazardous to human health and/or the environment.
-
-
23 Mar 10
Melissa OlsommerThough consumer product testing accounts for about 10% of the animals used in research, the practice generates most of the controversy.
-
mdzkeyThough consumer product testing accounts for about 10% of the animals used in research, the practice generates most of the controversy.
-
22 Mar 10
-
15 Mar 10
savanah pizloThough consumer product testing accounts for about 10% of the animals used in research, the practice generates most of the controversy.
-
Government statistics, where available, indicate that product testing accounts for approximately 10 percent of all animal use for scientific purposes, which amounts to many millions of animals per year worldwide
-
Government statistics, where available, indicate that product testing accounts for approximately 10 percent of all animal use for scientific purposes, which amounts to many millions of animals per year worldwide
-
-
11 Mar 10
-
19 Feb 10
-
Inna RyumshinThough consumer product testing accounts for about 10% of the animals used in research, the practice generates most of the controversy.
-
15 Feb 10
-
29 Jan 10
-
Animal Testing
-
-
06 Jan 10
-
generate
-
regulators
-
-
10 Dec 09
-
A large number of laws and regulations have been enacted to control the marketing of drugs, cosmetics, pesticides, food additives, and other products that could prove to be hazardous to human health and/or the environment
-
o control the marketing of drugs, cosmetics, pesticides, food additives, and other products that
-
Such regulations often prescribe a specific regime of laboratory testing to generate information that will enable government regulators to determine whether the benefits of a particular substance outweigh its potential harms.
-
where available, indicate that product testing accounts for approximately 10 percent of all animal use for scientific purposes,
-
which amounts to many millions of animals per year worldwide
-
Such testing calls into question the ethics and humaneness of deliberately poisoning animals (sometimes to death),
-
the appropriateness of harming animals for the sake of marketing a new brand of mascara or moisturizer, the applicability of animal data to humans, and the possibility of sparing millions of animals by developing alternatives to a handful of widely used procedures.
-
We are working on a national and global level to promote greater reliance on available alternative testing methods, and are actively supporting a landmark call by the US National Research Council for fundamental changes to the way product testing is conducted—to move from animal tests that are decades old, costly, slow and of dubious relevance to people, to ultra-modern, efficient and human-relevant non-animal methods.
-
-
06 Nov 09
-
04 Nov 09
-
03 Jun 09
-
We are working on a national and global level to promote greater reliance on available alternative testing methods, and are actively supporting a landmark call by the US National Research Council for fundamental changes to the way product testing is conducted— to move from animal tests that are decades old, costly, slow and of dubious relevance to people, to ultra-modern, efficient and human-relevant non-animal methods.
-
-
25 Mar 09
-
move from animal tests that are decades old, costly, slow and of dubious relevance to people, to ultra-modern, efficient and human-relevant non-animal methods.
-
10 percent of all animal use for scientific purposes, which amounts to many millions of animals per year worldwide.
-
many millions of animals per year worldwide
-
deliberately poisoning animals (sometimes to death), the appropriateness of harming animals for the sake of marketing a new brand of mascara or moisturizer,
-
deliberately poisoning animals (sometimes to death)
-
harming animals for the sake of marketing a new brand of mascara or moisturizer, the applicability of animal data to humans, and the possibility of sparing millions of animals by developing alternatives to a handful of widely used procedures.
-
animal-based toxicity studies to be an ethically and scientifically questionable means of evaluating potential hazards to human beings
-
alternative testing methods
-
move from animal tests that are decades old, costly, slow and of dubious relevance to people, to ultra-modern, efficient and human-relevant non-animal methods.
-
-
06 Mar 09
Brady Anderson
A large number of laws and regulations have been enacted to control the marketing of drugs, cosmetics, pesticides, food additives, and other products that could prove to be hazardous to human health and/or the environment. Such regulations often prescribe a specific regime of laboratory testing to generate information that will enable government regulators to determine whether the benefits of a particular substance outweigh its potential harms.
Government statistics, where available, indicate that product testing accounts for approximately 10 percent of all animal use for scientific purposes, which amounts to many millions of animals per year worldwide. Such testing calls into question the ethics and humaneness of deliberately poisoning animals (sometimes to death), the appropriateness of harming animals for the sake of marketing a new brand of mascara or moisturizer, the applicability of animal data to humans, and the possibility of sparing millions of animals by developing alternatives to a handful of widely used procedures.
The HSUS considers animal-based toxicity studies to be an ethically and scientifically questionable means of evaluating potential hazards to human beings, wildlife, or the environment we all share. We are working on a national and global level to promote greater reliance on available alternative testing methods, and are actively supporting a landmark call by the US National Research Council for fundamental changes to the way product testing is conducted—to move from animal tests that are decades old, costly, slow and of dubious relevance to people, to ultra-modern, efficient and human-relevant non-animal methods. -
29 Apr 08
-
Add Sticky Noteof chemicals and products, including drugs, vaccines, cosmetics, household cleaners, pesticides, foodstuffs, and packing materials
-
-
Add Sticky NoteThree Rs": They replace the use of animals in a scientific procedure; they reduce the number of animals used in a procedure; and/or they refine a procedure so the animals experience less pain, suffering or discomfort.
-
Other side view to show to public that they are trying to reduce the number of animals
-
-
-
02 Jan 08
Public Stiky Notes
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.