Mike McIlveen on 2009-05-08
A strong argument indicating where the ed market may end up, i.e. with technology embedded whether teachers and parents prefer that or not.
This link has been bookmarked by 50 people . It was first bookmarked on 08 May 2008, by Suzan Brandt.
Stanford ed. magazine Education Next. Page with projection of on-line credits by 2019. Coauthors of Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns (McGraw-Hill, 2008).
leadership pd technology blog stanford learning education future reform elearning
Mike McIlveen on 2009-05-08
A strong argument indicating where the ed market may end up, i.e. with technology embedded whether teachers and parents prefer that or not.
That schools have gotten little back from their investment in technology should come as no surprise. Virtually every organization does the same thing schools have done when implementing an innovation. An organization’s natural instinct is to cram the innovation into its existing operating model to sustain what it already does. This is the predictable course, the logical course—and the wrong course.
Article about the future of schools
2019 about 50 percent of courses will be delivered online. In other words, after a long period of incubation, the world will be poised to begin adopting computer-based learning at a much more rapid pace.
essay summarizing Clayton Christensen (!), Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns (2008). - Compare this story to Web 2.0 in Enterprises & Institutions: "A few years later, in 1955, Sony introduced the first batte
Use technologies that compete against nothing
imported education innovation technology k-12 virtualschool teaching online_learning
Apex Learning
The way to implement an innovation so that it will transform an organization is to implement it disruptively—not by using it to compete against the existing paradigm and serve existing customers, but to let it compete against “non-consumption,” where the
Computers do not deliver instruction. The teacher is still at the center of the classroom. And research shows that students who have access to computers in school don’t necessarily perform better on standardized exams.
Technology education disruptive innovation HigherEd Teaching learning research ROI article
Why technology shows little impact when it is used in a traditional context. Technology is a disruptive technology, and will only show its potential when it is used to do things fundamentally differently. Not new tools for the same purposes, but new tools
school reform online_learning disruptive virtualschool k-12 technology ateam education edtech virtual teaching change for:dan1056 for:Keith.Gillette for:mikewesch for:shoes5860 for:vel.vet
Use technologies that compete against nothing; interesting discussion of disruptive innovation...all innovation is disruptive, because all innovation is change and the very act of changing is synonymous with disruption. interesting tack
education Technology Disruptive Innovation schools transformation students teachers community
This article discusses the notion of disruptive innovation and what it means. Includes examples.
technology elearning education innovation for:patrickstoddart for:angelus7 for:atsc for:giedre
nt and the industry leaders’ customers cannot use the product, those companies have a difficult time implementing disruptive innovations.
Little by little, the disruption predictably improves. New companies introduce products that for them are sustaining innovations along their trajectory. And at some point, disruptive innovations become good enough to handle more complicated problems and take over, and the once-leading companies with old-line products go out of business. A few examples illustrate how this has happened time and again.
The Tale of the Transistor, a
Annotated link http://www.diigo.com/bookmark/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hoover.org%2Fpublications%2Fednext%2F18575969.html
Kellie 80 on 2008-05-17
Great point about why we must do things differently if we want different results.
Jon Tanner on 2008-12-12
Trying to do the same thing with different tools may allow incremental change, but technology provides us with the opportunity to do things qualitatively different.
Kellie 80 on 2008-05-17
I think this ties into the idea that we should be pushing computer companies to design for us what we need rather than tell us what existing product we need.
Kellie 80 on 2008-05-17
Why is this? Is it because this approach is not new but "fit into" our existing learning model? If students are not achieving with the way we currently teach, why would adding technology make a difference? If we change how we teach, maybe we would reach those who aren't succeeding.
Mike McIlveen on 2009-05-08
Technology makes a difference because that's where students are and where they will be. Agreed that we should teach with maximum effectiveness, both face-to-face and on-line. Moving into technolgy is not a choice for all teachers since the students will go there anyway.
Projected impact of computer-based/online learning on schools
The way to implement an innovation so that it will transform an organization is to implement it disruptively—not by using it to compete against the existing paradigm and serve existing customers, but to let it compete against “non-consumption,” where the alternative is nothing at all.
Public Stiky Notes
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.