Group annotations on this page
-
josephdunphy on 2009-03-28Situations posed, with no arguments offered for resolution.
Let's try one: "You are an inmate in a concentration camp. A sadistic guard is about to hang your son who tried to escape and wants you to pull the chair from underneath him. He says that if you don't he will not only kill your son but some other innocent inmate as well. You don't have any doubt that he means what he says. What should you do?"
How about: nothing? By complying with the guard's request, one reinforces the expectation that such a cruel effort to get the inmates to harm their own loved ones will succeed, encouraging the next such guard to hear of the idea to try it himself; the victim we don't know about remains a victim nevertheless. Let the father deny the guard his satisfaction in this.
This link has been bookmarked by 60 people . It was first bookmarked on 28 Jun 2006, by Cary.
-
25 Nov 09
-
17 Nov 09
-
06 Oct 09
-
29 Sep 09
-
In the judicial system of Imperial China, torture was technically illegal but tolerated because no one could be convicted without a confession. Torture could then be used with these provisions: (1) Questioning could only be done in open court. Since torture would then be administered in public, the public should agree, from the evidence, that the suspect is probably guilty. If it appeared that an innocent person was being tortured, a riot might result.
-
(3) if it turned out that an innocent person was convicted, the punishment he suffered could be imposed on the Judge.
-
-
16 Jul 09
-
10 Jul 09
-
23 Apr 09
-
09 Apr 09
-
07 Apr 09
-
03 Apr 09
-
29 Mar 09
-
22 Feb 09
-
14 Feb 09
The Ravine / Joseph Dunphy
Situations posed, with no arguments offered for resolution.
Let's try one: "You are an inmate in a concentration camp. A sadistic guard is about to hang your son who tried to escape and wants you to pull the chair from underneath him. He says that if you don't he will not only kill your son but some other innocent inmate as well. You don't have any doubt that he means what he says. What should you do?"
How about: nothing? By complying with the guard's request, one reinforces the expectation that such a cruel effort to get the inmates to harm their own loved ones will succeed, encouraging the next such guard to hear of the idea to try it himself; the victim we don't know about remains a victim nevertheless. Let the father deny the guard his satisfaction in this. -
07 Feb 09
-
07 Jan 09
-
The captain reasoned that the right thing to do in this situation was to force some individuals to go over the side and drown. Such an action, he reasoned, was not unjust to those thrown overboard, for they would have drowned anyway. If he did nothing, however, he would be responsible for the deaths of those whom he could have saved.
-
On the other hand, if the captain attempted to save some, he could do so only by killing others and their deaths would be his responsibility; this would be worse than doing nothing and letting all die.
- 2 more annotations...
-
-
Since the only possibility for rescue required great efforts of rowing, the captain decided that the weakest would have to be sacrificed.
-
You are an inmate in a concentration camp. A sadistic guard is about to hang your son who tried to escape and wants you to pull the chair from underneath him. He says that if you don't he will not only kill your son but some other innocent inmate as well. You don't have any doubt that he means what he says. What should you do?
-
-
-
01 Nov 08
-
18 Aug 08
-
14 Jul 08
-
17 Jun 08
-
14 Jun 08
-
01 Jun 08
-
21 Apr 08
-
You are an inmate in a concentration camp. A sadistic guard is about to hang your son who tried to escape and wants you to pull the chair from underneath him. He says that if you don't he will not only kill your son but some other innocent inmate as well. You don't have any doubt that he means what he says. What should you do?
-
-
21 Dec 07
-
26 Nov 07
-
15 Nov 07
-
14 Nov 07
-
02 Nov 07
-
The following is a list of some moral dilemmas, mostly adapted from Moral Reasoning, by Victor Grassian (Prentice Hall, 1981, 1992), with a couple additions. The question to consider with all of these is why they are dilemmas. Some, however, may not seem to be dilemmas at all. Discussion of the dilemmas can be found at The Generalized Structure of Ethical Dilemmas.
-
-
27 Jun 07
-
26 May 07
-
04 May 07
-
16 Apr 07
-
13 Nov 06
-
16 Sep 06
-
01 Jun 06
-
21 Apr 06
-
25 Oct 05
-
17 Jun 05
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.