This link has been bookmarked by 21 people . It was first bookmarked on 30 Jun 2009, by Clay Burell.
-
11 May 12
-
strategic state intervention, corporate long-term thinking, and insuppressible popular desire for material betterment,
-
owes a great deal to its strong fundamentals (high savings, urbanization, and demographics)
-
free trade, market reforms, and economic integration.
-
Asian countries have to grow faster because they're starting from a much lower base.
-
First, Asian states intervene more in the economy through industrial policy, infrastructural investment, and export promotion
-
Second, two types of companies-family-controlled conglomerates and giant, state-owned enterprises-dominate Asia's business landsc
-
short-termism of most American firms, they also shield them from shareholders and market pressures, making Asian firms less accountable, less transparent, and less innovative.
-
Asia is pouring money into higher education. But Asian universities will not become the world's leading centers of learning and research anytime soon. None of the world's top 10 universities is located in Asia, and only the University of Tokyo ranks among the world's top 20. In the last 30 years, only eight Asians, seven of them Japanese, have won a Nobel Prize in the sciences.
-
rote learning and test-taking will continue to hobble its efforts to clone the United States' finest research institutions.
-
10 percent of Chinese engineers and 25 percent of Indian engineers as even "employable," compared with 81 percent of American engineers.
-
dragon economies of South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Indonesia under Suharto, and now China experienced their fastest growth under nondemocratic regimes.
-
competitive politics can deliver economic goods better than a multiparty system tied down by too much democracy.
But Asia also ha
-
Obviously, India has many weaknesses: widespread poverty, poor infrastructure, and minimal social services. China appears to have done much better in these areas
-
roblems they create while democracy is good at advertising its defects.
-
-
04 Mar 10
-
28 Aug 09
-
15 Jul 09
-
Sustained, rapid economic growth since World War ii has undeniably boosted the region's economic output and military capabilities. But it's a gross exaggeration to say that Asia will emerge as the world's predominant power player. At most, Asia's rise will lead to the arrival of a multi-polar world, not another unipolar one.
-
Even Asia's much-touted numerical advantage is less than it seems. China supposedly graduates 600,000 engineering majors each year, India another 350,000. The United States trails with only 70,000 engineering graduates annually. Although these numbers suggest an Asian edge in generating brainpower, they are thoroughly misleading. Half of China's engineering graduates and two thirds of India's have associate degrees. Once quality is factored in, Asia's lead disappears altogether. A much-cited 2005 McKinsey Global Institute study reports that human resource managers in multinational companies consider only 10 percent of Chinese engineers and 25 percent of Indian engineers as even "employable," compared with 81 percent of American engineers.
-
Even when you look at autocracies credited with economic success, you find two interesting facts. First, their economic performance improved when they became less brutal and allowed greater personal and economic freedoms. Second, the keys to their successes were sensible economic policies, such as conservative macroeconomic management, infrastructural investment, promotion of savings, and pushing exports. Dictatorship really has no magic formula for economic development.
-
Dictatorships are good at concealing the problems they create while democracy is good at advertising its defects.
-
-
09 Jul 09
-
08 Jul 09
-
07 Jul 09
-
-
Asia is nowhere near closing its economic and military gap with the West.
-
More than 20 percent of Asians will be elderly by 2050. Aging is a principal cause of Japan's stagnation. China's elderly population will soar in the middle of the next decade. Its savings rate will fall while healthcare and pension costs explode. India is a lone exception to these trends-any one of which could help stall the region's growth.
-
Pollution is worsening Asia's shortage of fresh water while air pollution exacts a terrible toll on health (it kills almost 400,000 people each year in China alone). Without revolutionary advances in alternative energy, Asia could face a severe energy crunch. Climate change could devastate the region's agriculture.
-
The current economic crisis, moreover, will lead to huge overcapacity as Western demand evaporates.
-
Political instability could also throw Asia's economic locomotive off course. State collapse in Pakistan or a military conflict on the Korean Peninsula could wreak havoc. Rising inequality and endemic corruption in China could fuel social unrest and cause its economic growth to sputter.
-
-
dan maertens21ste eeuw, wordt mulitpolaire eeuw, niet die van Asië!
-
its per capita gdp is only $5,800, compared with $48,000 in the United States.
-
only a third that of the United States
-
it will take the average Asian 77 years to reach the income of the average American.
-
And Asia's combined military budget won't equal that of the United States for 72 years.
-
China's recent rise has pushed Japan and India closer together.
-
it does not seem to play an equally inspiring role as a thought leader.
-
and reward producers by subsidizing capital (typically through low bank lending rates).
-
The region's hierarchical culture, centralized bureaucracy, weak private universities, and emphasis on rote learning and test-taking will continue to hobble its efforts to clone the United States' finest research institutions.
-
that human resource managers in multinational companies consider only 10 percent of Chinese engineers and 25 percent of Indian engineers as even "employable," compared with 81 percent of American engineers.
-
Even when you look at autocracies credited with economic success, you find two interesting facts. First, their economic performance improved when they became less brutal and allowed greater personal and economic freedoms. Second, the keys to their successes were sensible economic policies, such as conservative macroeconomic management, infrastructural investment, promotion of savings, and pushing exports. Dictatorship really has no magic formula for economic development.
-
For complex reasons, China's rise has inspired fear and unease, not enthusiasm, among Asians. Only 10 percent of Japanese, 21 percent of South Koreans, and 27 percent of Indonesians surveyed by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs said they would be comfortable with China being the future leader of Asia.
-
Sixty-nine percent of Chinese, 75 percent of Indonesians, 76 percent of South Koreans, and 79 percent of Japanese in the Chicago Council's surveys said that U.S. influence in Asia had risen over the past decade.
-
Another, perhaps more important, reason for the enduring American preeminence in Asia is that most countries in the region welcome Washington as the guarantor of Asia's peace. Asian elites from New Delhi to Tokyo continue to count on Uncle Sam to keep a watchful eye on Beijing.
-
-
03 Jul 09
-
01 Jul 09
-
30 Jun 09
-
emphasis on rote learning and test-taking will continue to hobble its efforts to clone the United States' finest research institutions.
-
Although these numbers suggest an Asian edge in generating brainpower, they are thoroughly misleading. Half of China's engineering graduates and two thirds of India's have associate degrees. Once quality is factored in, Asia's lead disappears altogether.
-
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.