saved by11 people, first byKellie 80 on 2008-05-21, last byKim Cofino on 2008-06-28
"As it turns out, doing is not always more efficient than seeing," the report
concludes. "The reality is that for the novice student engaged in basic skill
building, such as learning chemical symbols, individual learning through reading
or simple drill and practice might be the optimal learning design. Yet, for a
different learning objective -- for instance, understanding the cause and effect
of a specific chemical reaction -- involving that same student in collaborative
problem solving might be the most effective learning approach."
Charles Fadel, Cisco's global lead for education, suggests that educators
devote their multimedia resources and interactive lessons to teaching complex
subjects, rather than wasting them on building students' basic skills. Teachers
developing interactive lessons for more advanced concepts, however, should keep
in mind that Cisco's report doesn't distinguish between lessons in which
students interact with prepared material and those in which they collaborate
with peers. Fadel says more research is necessary to determine the efficacy of
different types of interactivity.