Skip to main content

Close
Get the best research tool on the web today,and free!
Connect with people with common interests!

saved by11 people, first byKellie 80 on 2008-05-21, last byKim Cofino on 2008-06-28

  • Here are five rules for varying your teaching methods to help students learn more.
  • The Metiri Group's report disputes the widely debated Cone of Experience theory, which says each of us learns 10 percent of what we read, 20 percent of what we hear, 30 percent of what we see, 50 percent of what we hear and see, 70 percent of what we say or write, and 90 percent of what we say as we do a thing. (The rampant misrepresentation of researcher Edgar Dale's valid model of classifying learning styles is discussed in this entry in the blog of educational consultant Will Thalheimer.) After an extensive search, the report's authors were unable to find any empirical evidence supporting this breakdown. Contrary to popular opinion, research shows that lessons in which students interact with material, rather than passively absorb it, are not always better.
  • "As it turns out, doing is not always more efficient than seeing," the report
    concludes. "The reality is that for the novice student engaged in basic skill
    building, such as learning chemical symbols, individual learning through reading
    or simple drill and practice might be the optimal learning design. Yet, for a
    different learning objective -- for instance, understanding the cause and effect
    of a specific chemical reaction -- involving that same student in collaborative
    problem solving might be the most effective learning approach."

  • Charles Fadel, Cisco's global lead for education, suggests that educators
    devote their multimedia resources and interactive lessons to teaching complex
    subjects, rather than wasting them on building students' basic skills. Teachers
    developing interactive lessons for more advanced concepts, however, should keep
    in mind that Cisco's report doesn't distinguish between lessons in which
    students interact with prepared material and those in which they collaborate
    with peers. Fadel says more research is necessary to determine the efficacy of
    different types of interactivity.

  • Related words and pictures should appear at the same time and near each other on
    the page, the whiteboard, or the screen. Presenting them one after another, or
    separated by large spaces, reduces their effect.