Skip to main content

Diigo Home

Petraeus had Bush's ear. Will Mike Mullen have Obama's? | csmonitor.com - The Diigo Meta page

www.csmonitor.com/...p01s03-usmi.html - Cached - Annotated View

TransTracker 's personal annotations on this page

TransTracker
Transtracker bookmarked on 2008-11-20 gwot coin

So, soothing hurt feelings, following protocol, and listening to those who tell you what you want to hear will be Obama priorities in trying to figure out what to do in Afghanistan? Great.

  • Defense officials are conducting no fewer than three separate strategy assessments to help Mr. Obama decide on a new approach
    to confront the radical Islamic forces sowing unrest in the region. One report will come from Gen. David Petraeus, who came
    to represent the voice of the Bush administration on Iraq and who now oversees the wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Another
    due in coming days is from Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute, the "war czar" at the National Security Council.


    <!--startclickprintexclude-->
    <!--endclickprintexclude-->

    But the one that may count the most, say sources in and outside the Pentagon, is the assessment by Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman
    of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. For months, the chairman has said the US must do more to reverse deteriorating security in Afghanistan
    – a view Obama is known to share.

  • many expect
    Admiral Mullen to assert his position as top military adviser. General Petraeus's views held sway during the latter years
    of the Bush presidency, when the administration was desperate for a turnaround in Iraq. But Petraeus is now aligned in public
    thought with Bush policies, and Obama may feel he needs a new face to represent US military endeavors. This could well be
    Mullen, who is keen to restore the authority of his post, which had eroded under President Bush.

  • The connection Petraeus had to the White House, which was encouraged by Mr. Bush, irked some senior officers at the Pentagon
    who believed they were put at a disadvantage when they tried to provide advice on the "surge" of American troops in Iraq.


    Obama, whose advisers are attuned to that friction, shows signs of wanting to also restore the advisory authority of the chairman.

    • TransTracker
      Transtracker on 2008-11-20
      Of course. Everyone knows that it's more important to stick to the org. chart so that feelings don't get hurt rather than take advice from a successful, combat-tested commander. Propriety, protocol, and feelings are more important than success.
  • "I've said during this campaign, and I stick to this commitment, that as soon as I take office I will call in the Joint Chiefs
    of Staff, my national security apparatus, and we will start executing a plan that draws down our troops, particularly in light
    of the problems that we're having in Afghanistan, which has continued to worsen," Obama said on a "60 Minutes" interview shown
    Sunday.
    • TransTracker
      Transtracker on 2008-11-20
      Translation: "We're going to fight the plan not the enemy. I'm going to listen to advisers in Washington, not advisers in theater."

  • Mullen appears to be quietly asserting himself. Noting this week that there will be differences among the reports, he said
    it will be his job to provide the new president with conclusions that take the other assessments into account.


    "While there is a level of independence in each of those, which I think is healthy, I expect ... to take the outputs of those
    [reports] and integrate them from my perspective as chairman, in terms of my recommendation for future strategy with respect
    to Afghanistan," Mullen told reporters Tuesday.

    • TransTracker
      Transtracker on 2008-11-20
      And that will certainly make Obama's "decision-making" and "leadership" easier, won't it? In fact, by sticking to the org. chart, he won't have to decide or lead at all! He'll have a perfect cover for not deciding among three alternative recommendations. Instead, he can just say, "Well, that's the the CJCS recommended, so that's what we'll do! After all, he's my official military adviser!"

This link has been bookmarked by 1 people . It was first bookmarked on 20 Nov 2008, by TransTracker.

  • 20 Nov 08
    TransTracker
    TransTracker

    So, soothing hurt feelings, following protocol, and listening to those who tell you what you want to hear will be Obama priorities in trying to figure out what to do in Afghanistan? Great.

    gwot coin

    • Defense officials are conducting no fewer than three separate strategy assessments to help Mr. Obama decide on a new approach
      to confront the radical Islamic forces sowing unrest in the region. One report will come from Gen. David Petraeus, who came
      to represent the voice of the Bush administration on Iraq and who now oversees the wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Another
      due in coming days is from Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute, the "war czar" at the National Security Council.


      <!--startclickprintexclude-->
      <!--endclickprintexclude-->

      But the one that may count the most, say sources in and outside the Pentagon, is the assessment by Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman
      of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. For months, the chairman has said the US must do more to reverse deteriorating security in Afghanistan
      – a view Obama is known to share.

    • many expect
      Admiral Mullen to assert his position as top military adviser. General Petraeus's views held sway during the latter years
      of the Bush presidency, when the administration was desperate for a turnaround in Iraq. But Petraeus is now aligned in public
      thought with Bush policies, and Obama may feel he needs a new face to represent US military endeavors. This could well be
      Mullen, who is keen to restore the authority of his post, which had eroded under President Bush.
    • 3 more annotations...