Bench Marks » Blog Archive » Why Web 2.0 is failing in Biology - The Diigo Meta page

• 21 Sep 09
  

  Michel Roland

  web 2.0 biology Science 2.0

• 22 May 09
  

  Angela Alexander

  biology science web2.0 collaboration networking

• 02 May 09
  

  Bill Hooker

  import090501 openscience

• 20 Mar 09
  

  Neil Kirby

  web2.0 science

• 16 Jan 09
  

  mohammad bahawe

  ba7ith web2.0

• 03 Sep 08
  

  Ben Godfrey

  A look at the first wave of Web 2.0 software for researchers and scientists and some of the lessons learned.

  science research

• 12 Aug 08
  

  Brian Appleby

  academics internet

• 25 Jul 08
  

  Michel Bauwens

  I’ve been conducting an informal poll for the last four months, asking every scientist I know what science blogs they read or social networking science websites they use.

  P2P-Science P2P-Biology P2P

• 18 Jul 08
  

  Jack Pincus

  Articles on Web 2.0 in biology.

  collaboration science web2.0 biology socialnetworking lifesciences

• 08 Jul 08
  

  Pristis pristis

  academia Blogs social_networking science Blog_Posts_News_Articles Blog_Posts

• 17 May 08
  

  Bibliofusion Pierre Chicoine

  web2.0 science2.0 publications_savantes polemique

• 09 May 08
  

  Thomas Lemberger

  web2.0 biology publishing

• 05 May 08
  

  cwc-media delicious

• 31 Mar 08
  

  malin cantwell

  web2.0 collaboration criticism socialsoftware toread

• 

  an unflinching explanation why scientists do not participate in social networking sites. Anonymous postdoc: "I can barely keep up iwth the literature in my field and with what my labmates are doing. Who has time to spend reading some grad student's blog?"

  via:mamamusings social_networks participation_&_interaction david_crotty linkingthinking engaging delicious_import

• 30 Mar 08
  

  Ricardo Vidal

  web2.0 science biology blogs publishing web_2.0 presentation

• 28 Mar 08
  

  Can you tell a good article from a bad based on the abstract and the title alone?

  blogs web2.0 publishing

• 27 Mar 08
  

  Mario A Núñez

  ciencia_2.0

• 

  Seb Paquet

  when you step away from the enthusiasts and speak with the majority of scientists, you find out that they don’t have much interest in using many of these new technologies. The whole situation reminds me quite a bit of what one saw online regarding the L

  science web20 InnovationDiffusion

• 11 Mar 08
  

  Konrad .

  web_2.0 science biology

• 

  chemblaics

  web2.0 science biology blogs publishing toblog

• 

  dullhunk

  web2.0

• 

  Christina Pikas

  meta_science_blogging delicious

• 

  Neil Saunders

  I’ve been conducting an informal poll for the last four months, asking every scientist I know what science blogs they read or social networking science websites they use. I’ve spoken with undergraduates, graduate students, postdocs, PI’s and departm

  web2.0 blogs networking science publishing social

• 10 Mar 08
  

  Lisa Spiro

  David Crotty describes obstacles to Web 2.0, including lack of awareness, time, etc.

  web_2.0 digital_scholarship publishing science scholarly_communication

• 19 Feb 08
  

  Pierre L

  web2.0 science

• 

  Richard Akerman
  • I tried to be a bit more practical, taking more of a hard look at what’s currently being tried, whether it’s succeeding and the reasons behind that success/failure. I’m posting my talk below, in hopes of receiving further feedback. This talk was delivered to a room full of publishers, so it’s directed with that audience in mind. In a few months, I’m giving a similar talk to a meeting of scientists, the users of these sites rather than the creators. So I’d love to hear from users as to your thoughts on how Web 2.0 is serving your needs.
• 18 Feb 08
  

  Chris Lasher

  bioinformatics biology coldspringharbor computational presentation science web2.0

Would you like to comment?

Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.