Skip to main content

Diigo Home

"Rich Jerk Watch," by Knute Berger (Crosscut Seattle) - The Diigo Meta page

www.crosscut.com/...Rich+Jerk+Watch - Cached - Annotated View

Yule Heibel's personal annotations on this page

lampertina
Lampertina bookmarked on 2008-05-19 crosscut knute_berger trendwatch transumerism

Berger is on another tear here (and being inconsistent, as the first comment points out), but I'm totally intrigued by his illustration of the "transumer" trend. It makes so much sense, when you think about it, even though it's almost creepy at some level. (I'm not impressed by Berger's rants against transumers, though; those diatribes fail to ring my bells.)

Years ago, I recall learning that Mick Jagger never traveled with luggage because he just "acquired" whatever he needed wherever he was. He didn't need to trail a score of cases of possessions when he hopped from place to place. In a sense, the wealthy people that Berger describes here exemplify a kind of Jaggerism-trickle-down effect. You don't need to be a rolling stone anymore to be "free" of possessions (and fashion mistakes). You just rent the appropriate materials for brief moments of time. You become an occasion, occasionally dipping into things, and just as quickly escaping their hold again.

The really really important thing about capital, after all, is that it circulates. Of course people will be the site of that circulation, not just the site of accumulation.

  • Then I stumbled on a piece with a word I hadn't heard (though I'm sure Crosscut readers are way ahead of me on this). It was in a story about a Seattle company called Bag Borrow or Steal that rents high-end fashion accessories online, mostly to women who want to try out the latest Sex in the City-style shoes or purses. Here's the explanation:
  • Because fashion trends come and go so quickly, women want to have over-the-top luxury accessories for special occasions without suffering buyer’s remorse or over-cluttered closets, [chief marketing officer Jodi] Watson says. Once customers have finished with their fashion statements, they can exchange them for the next things on their lists for a monthly fee, à la Netflix.

    Women also use the company as a way to try the items out before sinking a few grand on the newest Gucci. The “steal” option in the company’s title allows customers to purchase any accessories, sometimes at discounted rates, depending on the make and condition of the item.

  • So it's a business that doesn't promote consumption, but in a way restrains it: instead of buying wardrobes with quick expire dates, you rent and return them. Sort of high-end fashion recycling.

    So who rents this stuff? "Transumers." No, these aren't spendy trans-sexuals or transvestites, they're "people who want to experience luxury without the hassle of ownership."

  • Transumers are consumers driven by experiences instead of the 'fixed', by entertainment, by discovery, by fighting boredom, who increasingly live a transient lifestyle, freeing themselves from the hassles of permanent ownership and possessions. The fixed is replaced by an obsession with the here and now, an ever-shorter satisfaction span, and a lust to collect as many experiences and stories as possible. Hey, the past is, well, over, and the future is uncertain, so all that remains is the present, living for the 'now'.

This link has been bookmarked by 1 people . It was first bookmarked on 19 May 2008, by Yule Heibel.

  • 19 May 08
    lampertina
    Yule Heibel

    Berger is on another tear here (and being inconsistent, as the first comment points out), but I'm totally intrigued by his illustration of the "transumer" trend. It makes so much sense, when you think about it, even though it's almost creepy at some level. (I'm not impressed by Berger's rants against transumers, though; those diatribes fail to ring my bells.)

    Years ago, I recall learning that Mick Jagger never traveled with luggage because he just "acquired" whatever he needed wherever he was. He didn't need to trail a score of cases of possessions when he hopped from place to place. In a sense, the wealthy people that Berger describes here exemplify a kind of Jaggerism-trickle-down effect. You don't need to be a rolling stone anymore to be "free" of possessions (and fashion mistakes). You just rent the appropriate materials for brief moments of time. You become an occasion, occasionally dipping into things, and just as quickly escaping their hold again.

    The really really important thing about capital, after all, is that it circulates. Of course people will be the site of that circulation, not just the site of accumulation.

    crosscut knute_berger trendwatch transumerism

    • Then I stumbled on a piece with a word I hadn't heard (though I'm sure Crosscut readers are way ahead of me on this). It was in a story about a Seattle company called Bag Borrow or Steal that rents high-end fashion accessories online, mostly to women who want to try out the latest Sex in the City-style shoes or purses. Here's the explanation:
    • Because fashion trends come and go so quickly, women want to have over-the-top luxury accessories for special occasions without suffering buyer’s remorse or over-cluttered closets, [chief marketing officer Jodi] Watson says. Once customers have finished with their fashion statements, they can exchange them for the next things on their lists for a monthly fee, à la Netflix.

      Women also use the company as a way to try the items out before sinking a few grand on the newest Gucci. The “steal” option in the company’s title allows customers to purchase any accessories, sometimes at discounted rates, depending on the make and condition of the item.

    • 2 more annotations...