This link has been bookmarked by 42 people . It was first bookmarked on 20 Jan 2008, by Deborah Fitchett.
-
21 Oct 08
Davis Mediadiscussion of Library 2.0 and web 2.0 tools.
web2.0 tools newmedia community media critique discussion socialnetworking blogs library2.0 criticism
-
23 Aug 08
-
10 Jun 08
-
09 Jun 08
-
17 Apr 08
sarah haymangood thoughtful post, comments on tagging in public library catalogue (his project at Ann Arbor) not the success he had hoped
-
26 Mar 08
-
21 Mar 08
-
01 Mar 08
mark vantechnology ... should be transparent, intuitive, and a natural extension of the patron experience. If it can’t be transparent, then it should be so overwhelmingly beneficial to the user that it is canonized not by the techies, but the users themselves.
-
07 Feb 08
-
31 Jan 08
-
30 Jan 08
-
29 Jan 08
-
27 Jan 08
-
26 Jan 08
-
25 Jan 08
-
24 Jan 08
-
22 Jan 08
-
20 Jan 08
-
19 Jan 08
-
Judy O'ConnellPerhaps the most significant area of neglect is our failure to recognize that Library 2.0 is a delicate ecology. Like Web 2.0, it represents technology that is inherently disruptive on many levels.
-
gccconlineAn interesting post reflecting on the coopting of the term
Library 2.0. This is a good post and a must read. It's getting a lot of
press in the biblioblogosphere. -
18 Jan 08
Jill ONeillThe point is not that Web 2 has failed in the context of the library but that communication requirements within a library setting require adaptation of those tools in order to be effective (IMHO)
-
17 Jan 08
-
Ratcatcher"I’ll even turn the tables on myself and admit that I was wrong about local tagging in the OPAC. SOPAC was by-and-large a success, but its use of user-contributed tags is a failure"
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.