Educational Leadership:Multiple Measures:Teaching with Interactive Whiteboards

This link has been bookmarked by 51 people . It was first bookmarked on 31 Oct 2009, by TamL17 Tammy.

02 Dec 09

Tony Richards
whiteboards iwb research teaching educational leadership article
30 Nov 09

Barbara McLaughlin
marzano
29 Nov 09

Joao Alves
whiteboards iwb research teaching
28 Nov 09

Andrea Richmond
White boards
26 Nov 09

Samantha Morra
interactivewhiteboards marzano smartboard
21 Nov 09

jennifer verschoor
whiteboards iwb teaching marzano smartboard educational leadership
- using interactive whiteboards was associated with a 16 percentile point gain in student achievement.
John Turner
Teaching with Interactive Whiteboards

Robert J. Marzano

"Interactive whiteboards have become popular over the last few years, and it appears that their use will continue to grow exponentially. Indeed, books like The Interactive Whiteboard Revolution (Betcher & Lee, 2009) attest to the depth and breadth of change that this tool can promote in classroom practice."

jturner56 jturner56edtech
17 Nov 09

Marsha Ratzel
whiteboards clickers marzano
16 Nov 09

Reynold Redekopp
Marzano research about effective abd ineffective ways of using IWB

education whiteboards iwb research teaching smartboard ICT
15 Nov 09

Kristin Gleason
whiteboards smartboard leadership teaching marzano resources technology education
13 Nov 09

David Sladkey
marzano smartboard iwb
12 Nov 09

Pamela Mackowski
IWB whiteboards educational research teaching
Bonnie Blagojevic
whiteboards ascd research techeducators
John Maschak
iwb whiteboards research teaching leadership marzano smartboard educational
Diane Quirk
Marzano research into use of IWB's in classrooms

smartboard research
11 Nov 09

Maureen Tumenas
iwb
Cyndi Danner-Kuhn
whiteboards smartboard leadership teaching marzano resources technology education
Jennifer Earl
Marzano's article on IWB researching findings on IWB and student achievement

smartboards articles profresearch studentachievement pedagogy
09 Nov 09

Jim Daly
"What the Research Found

The study results indicated that, in general, using interactive whiteboards was associated with a 16 percentile point gain in student achievement. This means that we can expect a student at the 50th percentile in a classroom without the technology to increase to the 66th percentile in a classroom using whiteboards."

whiteboards marzano research Smartboard
colin davitt
whiteboards iwb
Stephanie Affield
08 Nov 09

Ken Butta
06 Nov 09

Phil Taylor
iwb research whiteboards teaching leadership marzano educational
- The study results indicated that, in general, using interactive whiteboards was associated with a 16 percentile point gain in student achievement. This means that we can expect a student at the 50th percentile in a classroom without the technology to increase to the 66th percentile in a classroom using whiteboards.
Siu Connor
This article reaffirms my belief that the IWB can be an extremely effective and powerful educational tool IF it is used correctly.
- 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  <script language="javascript">
  
  // how long to wait before pane open
  function GetTimeout()
  {
  return 350; // in milliseconds
  }
  /// Set selected index
  function Openpane(paneIndex){
  
  var behavior = $get("dnn_ctr896_ViewVCMNavigationModule_SiteNavi").AccordionBehavior;
  
  // doClose();
  
  behavior.set_SelectedIndex(paneIndex);
  }
  
  // function doClose()
  // {
  // alert($get("dnn_ctr896_ViewVCMNavigationModule_SiteNavi").get_SelectedIndex);
  // //$find("cpe")._doClose();
  // }
  
  /// mouseOn
  function mouseOn(nav,BGColor){
  document.getElementById(nav).style.background = BGColor;
  document.getElementById(nav).style.color='#ffffff';
  reSetActiveColor();
  }
  
  /// mouseOff
  function mouseOff(nav,BGColor){
  document.getElementById(nav).style.background = BGColor;
  document.getElementById(nav).style.color='#000000';
  }
  
  /// reSetActiveColor
  function reSetActiveColor(){
  
  }
  
  // header click redirect
  function RedirectURL(href)
  {
  window.location = href;
  
  }
  // function setActiveLink(test)
  // {
  // }
  // function setActiveColor()
  // {
  // }
  </script>
  
  About ASCD
  
  Affiliates
  Annual Report
  Careers at ASCD
  Corporate Sponsorship
  Governance
  Connected Communities
  Student Chapters
  Networks
  
  Join / Membership
  
  Community
  Join (Individual)
  Join (Institutional)
  Learn More / Benefits
  Renew
  
  Research A Topic
  
  21st Century Learning
  Differentiating Instruction
  English Language Learners
  H1N1 Flu Virus
  Response to Intervention (RTI)
  Understanding by Design
  What Works in Schools
  More
  
  Publications
  
  Blog
  Books
  Educational Leadership
  E-Publications
  Lexicon of Learning
  Newsletters
  Past ASCD Publications
  SmartBrief
  
  Professional Development
  
  Conferences
  Institutes
  On-Site Capacity Building
  PD Online Courses
  PD In Focus
  
  Conferences
  
  Annual Conference
  Summer Conference
  Fall Conference - Teaching & Learning
  Institutes / Regional Conferences
  Leader to Leader (L2L) Event
  LEAP Legislative Institute
  
  Initiatives & Programs
  
  ASPIRE Assessment System
  First Amendment Schools
  Emerging Leaders
  Healthy School Communities
  What Works in Schools Survey
  Outstanding Young Educator
  Understanding by Design Exchange
  The Whole Child
  
  News & Media
  
  ASCD Policy Positions
  Education Issues
  Is It Good for the Kids?
  Press Room
  Public Policy
  
  Public Policy
  
  Contact Lawmakers
  High School Reform
  Legislative Agenda
  LEAP Legislative Institute
  Research Legislation
  Sign Up / Educator Advocates
  
  ASCD Store
  
  Books
  Videos
  Multimedia
  Online Services
  Audio
  Magazines & Newsletters
  Downloads
  
  Site Map
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  MISSION: ASCD (formerly the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development) is a membership organization that develops programs, products, and services essential to the way educators learn, teach, and lead.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  We are here to help!
  
  1703 North Beauregard St.
  
  Alexandria, VA 22311-1714
  
  Tel: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723)
  
  Fax: 1-703-575-5400
  
  8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. EST Monday through Friday
  
  Local to the D.C. area:
  
  703-578-9600, press 1
  
  Toll-free from the U.S. and Canada: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723), press 1
  
  All other countries (International Access Code): +1-703-578-9600, press 1
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Permissions and Translations
  
  ASCD recognizes and respects intellectual property rights and adheres to copyright law. Learn about our rights and permissions policies.
  
  More
  
  
  
  
  
  
- 
  
  
  
  
  
  publications
  
  Home
  
  Current Issue
  
  Archives
  
  Search
  
  Buy
  
  Contact
  
  
  
  
- 1 more annotations...
- - Interactive whiteboards have great potential as a tool to enhance pedagogical practices in the classroom and ultimately improve student achievement. However, simply assuming that using this or any other technological tool can automatically enhance student achievement would be a mistake. As is the case with all powerful tools, teachers must use interactive whiteboards thoughtfully, in accordance with what we know about good classroom practic
05 Nov 09

Barbara Reid
iwb research teaching leadership IWBs
Chris Harkness
iwb research teaching student learning
Justin Medved
for:dharter for:jutecht for:mdil whiteboards iwb smartboard
antónio alves
diigo
04 Nov 09

sherryn moore
This may be useful if you are looking for a good article to stimulate some discussion around the use of interactive whiteboards

teaching research whiteboards tools
Tami Brass
iwb whiteboards teaching leadership send2blog
- The study results indicated that, in general, using interactive whiteboards was associated with a 16 percentile point gain in student achievement. This means that we can expect a student at the 50th percentile in a classroom without the technology to increase to the 66th percentile in a classroom using whiteboards.
- In addition, three features inherent in interactive whiteboards have a statistically significant relationship with student achievement.
- 15 more annotations...
- - learner-response device
  - use of graphics and other visuals to represent information
  - —applications that teachers can use to signal that an answer is correct or to present information in an unusual context.
  - the interactive whiteboard
    reinforcer
  - in 23 percent of the cases, teachers had better results without the interactive whiteboards
  - some potential pitfalls
  - Using the voting devices but doing little with the findings.
  - Not organizing or pacing the content well.
  - Using too many visuals.
  - Paying too much attention to reinforcing features.
  - They should group information into small, meaningful segments before they start developing the digital flipcharts.
  - Teachers should think through how they intend to organize information.
  - Digital flipcharts should contain visuals, but those visuals should clearly focus on the important information. Also, no single flipchart should contain too many visuals or too much written information.
  - After asking a question and getting student responses using voting devices, the teacher should typically discuss the correct answer along with the incorrect answers, making sure to elicit opinions from as many students as possible.
  - When using reinforcing features like virtual applause, teachers should make sure that students focus on why an answer is correct or incorrect. Although these features can produce high engagement and certainly enliven the atmosphere in a classroom, they can also be distracting if used without a clear focus on essential content.
deb kitchener
whiteboards marzano education research educational technology
- eneral, using interactive whiteboards was associated with a 16 percentile point gain in student achievement.
- learner-response device—handheld voting devices
- 15 more annotations...
- - graphics and other visuals to represent information.
  - nteractive whiteboard
    reinforcer
  - 31 percentile point gain in student achievement.
  - better results without the interactive whiteboards.
  - potential pitfalls
  - Using the voting devices but doing little with the findings.
  - Not organizing or pacing the content well.
  - too many visuals.
  - too much attention to reinforcing features
  - what we know about good teaching in general
  - Teachers should think through how they intend to organize information
  - visuals should clearly focus on the important informatio
  - no single flipchart should contain too many visuals or too much written information.
  - discuss the correct answer along with the incorrect
  - focus on why an answer is correct or incorrec
Jason Schmidt
iwb research whiteboards teaching marzano leadership educational multiple smartboard
mikecaulfield
The study results indicated that, in general, using interactive whiteboards was associated with a 16 percentile point gain in student achievement. This means that we can expect a student at the 50th percentile in a classroom without the technology to increase to the 66th percentile in a classroom using whiteboards.

In addition, three features inherent in interactive whiteboards have a statistically significant relationship with student achievement. The first is the learner-response device—handheld voting devices that students use to enter their responses to questions. The percentage of students providing the correct answer is then immediately displayed on the board in a bar graph or pie chart. Using voting devices was associated with a 26 percentile point gain in student achievement.

A second feature is the use of graphics and other visuals to represent information. These include downloaded pictures and video clips from the Internet, sites such as Google Earth, and graphs and charts. Use of these aids was also associated with a 26 percentile point gain in student achievement.

A third feature is the interactive whiteboard reinforcer—applications that teachers can use to signal that an answer is correct or to present information in an unusual context.

whiteboards smartboard research assessment
Tim Sparacino
interactive iwb administration professionaldevelopment teachingwithiwb
- using interactive whiteboards was associated with a 16 percentile point gain in student achievement.
- In addition, three features inherent in interactive whiteboards have a statistically significant relationship with student achievement. The first is the learner-response device
- 21 more annotations...
- - A second feature is the use of graphics and other visuals to represent information. These include downloaded pictures and video clips from the Internet, sites such as Google Earth, and graphs and charts. Use of these aids was also associated with a 26 percentile point gain in student achievement.
  - A third feature is the interactive whiteboard
    reinforcer—applications that teachers can use to signal that an answer is correct or to present information in an unusual context. These applications include dragging and dropping correct answers into specific locations, acknowledging correct answers with virtual applause, and uncovering information hidden under objects. These practices were associated with a 31 percentile point gain in student achievement.
  - One of the more interesting findings from the study was that in 23 percent of the cases, teachers had better results without the interactive whiteboards. To determine why this occurred, we examined video-tapes of teachers using the boards. These disclosed some potential pitfalls in using the technology:
    Using the voting devices but doing little with the findings.
  - teachers simply noted how many students obtained the correct answer instead of probing into why one answer was more appropriate than another.
  - teachers incorporated video segments from the Internet or images intended to represent important information
  - Not organizing or pacing the content well.
  - However, they ran through the flipcharts so quickly that students,
  - did not have time to analyze and interact with one another about the content.
  - Using too many visuals.
  - hard to identify the important content.
  - Paying too much attention to reinforcing features
  - the emphasis seemed to be on eliciting the applause rather than on clarifying the content
  - Getting the Most Out of the Technology
  - Teachers should think through how they intend to organize information
  - group information into small, meaningful segments before they start developing the digital flipcharts.
  - To ensure that they don't run through the flipcharts too quickly, teachers can insert flipcharts that remind them to stop the presentation so students can process and analyze the new information.
  - visuals should clearly focus on the important information.
  - no single flipchart should contain too many visuals or too much written information.
  - After asking a question and getting student responses using voting devices, the teacher should typically discuss the correct answer along with the incorrect answers, making sure to elicit opinions from as many students as possible.
  - When using reinforcing features like virtual applause, teachers should make sure that students focus on why an answer is correct or incorrect.
  - simply assuming that using this or any other technological tool can automatically enhance student achievement would be a mistake. As is the case with all powerful tools, teachers must use interactive whiteboards thoughtfully, in accordance with what we know about good classroom practice.
Ashley Hurley
diigo whiteboards
- pears that their use will continue to grow exponentially. Indeed, books like The Interactive Whiteboard Revolution (Becker & Lee, 2009) attest to the depth and breadth of change that this tool can promote in classroom pr
- in general, using interactive whiteboards was associated with a 16 percentile point gain in student achievement. This means that we can expect a student at the 50th percentile in a classroom without the technology to increase to the 66th percentile in a classroom using whiteboards.
Dianne Krause
"The study results indicated that, in general, using interactive whiteboards was associated with a 16 percentile point gain in student achievement. This means that we can expect a student at the 50th percentile in a classroom without the technology to increase to the 66th percentile in a classroom using whiteboards."

iwb research teaching whiteboards smartboard
Isabelle Jones
research iwb teaching leadership training resources
John Evans
iwb research teaching marzano leadership educational
Mark Pilson
iwb whiteboards marzano research teaching pedagogy
03 Nov 09

Ben Wyatt
Article on the use of whiteboards in the classroom along with clickers or any student response system. Studies indicate higher student achievement.

whiteboards clickers technology best practices
Jeremy Brown
interactive whiteboards
Darcie Priester
smartboards iwb
Joy Walton
iwb article
Ilyssa Weiss
Marzano research on interactive whiteboard

education research Promethean
L Butler
Educational Leadership:Multiple Measures: Teaching with Interactive Whiteboards

iwb research
Steven Anderson
whiteboards marzano IWB favorite
Danny Nicholson
teaching project report multiple leadership whiteboards iwb educational marzano research
31 Oct 09

Steve Ransom
iwb research marzano
TamL17 Tammy
whiteboards smartboard