This link has been bookmarked by 24 people . It was first bookmarked on 27 Feb 2008, by Olivier Le Deuff.
-
02 May 11
-
24 Jun 09
-
26 Mar 09
-
January 2008
-
This article reports on research presented on a panel at
-
2007 annual conference
-
investigated the use of social tagging in communities and in context
-
users, consciously or unconsciously, take into account their communities of practice when assigning tags
-
a working prototype of a collaborative tool conceived for social tagging of specialised domains
-
There are three models of how tagging is used in China as metadata
-
the relationship of the user to the information, showing how the user perceives ('reads') that information object
-
users that are connected together through their use of tags
-
users are tagging to relate their concept of information to another user's concept of some piece of information
-
This type of tagging is also heavily misused
-
It may be used inconsistently
-
metadata to allow search engines to know which information is related to other information. This type of tagging is used greatly within ontologies
-
link banks of data (or information) to other information
-
in communities of practice the flat keywords space of user-generated tags
-
FaceTag is a collaborative tagging tool conceived for bookmarking resources in a given domain
-
improve the information architecture of a social tagging system
-
effectively mixed with a richer faceted classification scheme
-
Social Networking and Annotation
-
Social Networking and Annotation
-
the idea of a large, stable meta-structure containing a linguistically stable group of individuals can be discounted
-
seeing named social entities in a dataset may simply reflect our own preconceptions
-
diverse definitions and uses of the term ‘community’
-
Open questions abound
-
these present studies have only scratched the surface
-
an indexing resource
-
a central resource for community organisation and development
-
a channel for communication between members of a community
-
-
29 Oct 08
-
22 Oct 08
-
04 Sep 08
-
It has been suggested that once enough user-generated tags have been supplied, social tagging could lead to interesting folksonomies with benefits similar to a formal controlled vocabulary
-
However, people have varying motivators for tagging [5] and often use tags for purposes other than assigning subject terms.
-
He argued that associative trails better represented how users actually work with their documents: as a holistic process of association closely tied to themselves and their work rather than by categorisation.
-
This suggests that user tagging could provide additional access points to traditional controlled vocabularies and provide users with the associative classifications necessary to tie documents and articles to time, task and project relationships as well as other associations which are new and novel.
-
-
01 Jul 08
-
10 Jun 08
-
04 Apr 08
Dominique PapinAriadne Issue 54 jan 2008 "In these studies, the uses made of tags in several communities was examined." Emma Tonkin, Edward M. Corrado, Heather Lea Moulaison, Margaret E. I. Kipp, Andrea Resmini, Heather D. Pfeiffer and Qiping Zhang
-
21 Mar 08
-
14 Mar 08
-
01 Mar 08
zpinheadSocial tagging, which is also known as collaborative tagging, social classification, and social indexing, allows ordinary users to assign keywords, or tags, to items. Typically these items are Web-based resources and the tags become immediately available
classification folksonomy tagging web2.0 libraries del.icio.us
-
28 Feb 08
-
27 Feb 08
-
26 Feb 08
-
22 Feb 08
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.