This link has been bookmarked by 50 people and liked by 1 people. It was first bookmarked on 02 Aug 2006, by Jason Fleming.
-
06 Jan 17
-
an attitude not a technology.'
-
Web 2.0 is the network as platform, spanning all connected devices; Web 2.0 applications are those that make the most of the intrinsic advantages of that platform: delivering software as a continually-updated service that gets better the more people use it, consuming and remixing data from multiple sources, including individual users, while providing their own data and services in a form that allows remixing by others, creating network effects through an "architecture of participation," and going beyond the page metaphor of Web 1.0 to deliver rich user experiences.'
-
point of need,
-
direct access to Web-visible resources
-
freeing of data
-
permits the building of virtual applications
-
participative
-
work for the user
-
modular,
-
sharing
-
communication and facilitating community
-
remix
-
smart
-
Trust
-
Leveraging the approaches typified by Web 2.0's principles and technology offers libraries many opportunities to serve their existing audiences better, and to reach out beyond the walls and Web sites of the institution to reach potential beneficiaries where they happen to be, and in association with the task that they happen to be undertaking.
-
-
10 Dec 16
-
21 Jun 16
luisdavid95'Web 2.0' is a hot story out on the blogosphere right now, with an army of advocates facing off against those who argue that it is nothing new, and their allies with painful memories of Dot Com hysteria in the 1990s. Even respectable media outlets such as Business Week are getting excited, and an expensive conference in San Francisco at the start of October had to turn people away as it passed over 800 registrations.
-
12 Mar 16
-
28 Mar 15
-
24 Mar 15
-
10 Dec 14
-
Web 2.0: A State of Mind?
-
n attitude not a technology
-
Tim O'Reilly
-
define the concepts behind Web 2.0,
-
diagram
-
definition
-
applications
-
s the network as platform, spanning all connected devices
-
continually-updated
-
make the most of the intrinsic advantages of that platform
-
software
-
gets better the more people use it
-
multiple sources,
-
remixing
-
consuming
-
wn data and services
-
llows remixing b
-
ncluding individual users
-
creating network effects through an "architecture of participation,"
-
deliver rich user experiences.
-
significant degree of hype around Web 2.0
-
important principles
-
deliver value to users, when, where and in the form that they require it
-
ad hoc relationships
-
for these services at the point of need
-
disaggregation of content and services in
-
previously passive recipients of content beginning to engage,
-
combine and recombine
-
Figure 1 - Tim O'Reilly's Web 2.0 'meme map'
-
Paul's Principles of Web 2.0
-
freeing of data
-
permits the building of virtual applications,
-
participative
-
work for the user,
-
modular
-
sharing
-
ommunication and facilitating community
-
remix
-
smart
-
he Long Tail
-
Trust
-
Web 2.0 + Library = Library 2.0?
-
Leveraging the approaches typified by Web 2.0's principles and technology offers libraries many opportunities to serve their existing audiences better, and to reach out beyond the walls and Web sites of the institution to reach potential beneficiaries where they happen to be, and in association with the task that they happen to be undertaking
-
take our existing wealth of data, and we make it work much harder.
-
break down the internal silos of the separate systems within a single library
-
connect those components to one another, and to related components and services far beyond the building.
-
possible for searchers to be presented with choices to view online, borrow locally, request from afar, buy or sell as appropriate to their needs and circumstance
-
technical
-
level
-
we are doing it with standards and specifications shared across a range of sectors, rather than inventing our own library-specific standards
-
Can our institutional procedures, and our antiquated notions of 'membership' keep up?
-
With the rise of Google, Amazon, Wikipedia and more, there is an oft-stated fear that many users, much of the time, will bypass processes and institutions that they perceive to be slow, unresponsive, unappealing and irrelevant in favour of a more direct approach to services offered by others that just might be 'good enough' for what they need to do.
-
Libraries should be seizing every opportunity to challenge these perceptions, and to push their genuinely valuable content, services and expertise out to places where people might stand to benefit from them;
-
Web 2.0 could be seen as comprising equal parts of evolution and revolution.
-
hallenges outdated attitudes towards the rights of the user, customer choice and empowerment.
-
participative
-
For libraries and associated organisations, though, there is equal scope for participation. We need to work together
-
None of us can do all of this alon
-
-
15 Dec 13
-
Libraries should be seizing every opportunity to challenge these perceptions, and to push their genuinely valuable content, services and expertise out to places where people might stand to benefit from them; places where a user would rarely consider drawing upon a library for support.
-
-
19 Sep 13
-
25 Mar 13
-
14 Sep 12
-
12 Sep 12
Deborah MarksConsideration of how Web 2.0 can impact libraries and services to users.
-
11 Sep 12
-
07 Sep 12
-
06 Sep 12
-
05 Sep 12
-
30 Aug 12
-
22 Aug 12
-
28 Feb 09
-
25 Mar 08
-
13 Mar 08
-
05 Sep 07
-
10 Jul 07
-
26 Feb 07
Cinzia BocchiArticolo su come può influire il web 2.0 per l'organizzazione della conoscenza.
-
31 Aug 06
-
02 Aug 06
-
10 May 06
-
27 Apr 06
-
21 Apr 06
Rachel CAriadne article by Paul Miller. Issue 45, October 2005.
web2.0 library information architecture socialsoftware collaboration classification Ariadne article Internet
-
22 Dec 05
Matthiasslow, unresponsive, unappealing and irrelevant, or genuinely valuable content, services and expertise
-
11 Nov 05
Page Comments
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.