To which, presumably, manga will adapt the way they adapted to the famous no-pubic-hair Article 175: by diving into every loophole. The childlike characters in pornographic manga originally surfaced because adult nudes, with pubic hair, could not be depicted. Drawings and virtual images do no reflect real persons in the vast majority of cases. If a creator says that the underage-looking character he's drawn is actually 22 years old, who can prove him wrong? Where's the line?
Public Stiky Notes
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.