This link has been bookmarked by 80 people . It was first bookmarked on 06 Jan 2009, by Cristian Vasile.
-
25 Oct 12
-
23 Dec 11
-
24 Oct 11
-
28 Sep 11
Sebastien WiertzI’m going to make a bold prediction. Long after you and I are gone, HTML will still be around. Not just in billions of archived pages from our era, but as a living, breathing entity. Too much effort, energy, and investment has gone into developing the web
-
26 Sep 11
-
25 Sep 11
-
20 Sep 11
-
05 Aug 11
-
23 Jun 11
-
19 Dec 10
-
05 Dec 10
-
06 Nov 10
-
06 Jul 10
-
12 May 10
-
07 Apr 10
-
01 Feb 10
-
03 Nov 09
-
02 Nov 09
-
23 Jun 09
-
04 Jun 09
-
01 May 09
-
19 Mar 09
-
This is not simply a theoretical problem. Hundreds of thousands of developers use the
classandidattributes of HTML to create more richly semantic markup.
-
-
29 Jan 09
-
22 Jan 09
Simone Economo"We don’t need to add specific terms to the vocabulary of HTML, we need to add a mechanism that allows semantic richness to be added to a document as required. In technical terms, we need to make HTML extensible. HTML 5 proposes no mechanism for extensibi
compatibility xhtml webdesign webdev webstandards w3c semantics forward html5 microformats attribute semanticweb vocabulary role crossbrowsing backward for:checkm for:tyrion.mx for:craiv
-
18 Jan 09
-
13 Jan 09
-
11 Jan 09
-
10 Jan 09
-
09 Jan 09
-
08 Jan 09
-
07 Jan 09
-
06 Jan 09
-
Chris JoblingDiscusses (or rather poses the problem) of how to provide extensibiliy hooks that will enable a restricted syntax such as HTML to grow to provide more semantics. Like a lot of these things, extensibility is hampered by the need to agree on a vocabulary! A
web html5 list.apart webdevelopment folksonomy microformats HTML semantic
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.