This link has been bookmarked by 73 people . It was first bookmarked on 07 Aug 2007, by Mario a núñez.
-
Sheri Trapp-CordovaInteresting discussion...context is rubrics in writing but issues spill into assessment in general.
-
The fatal flaw in this logic is revealed by a line of research in educational psychology showing that students
whose attention is relentlessly focused on how well they’re doing often become less engaged with what they're doing. -
What’s our reason for trying to evaluate the
quality of students’ efforts? It matters whether the objective is to (1) rank kids against one another, (2) provide an extrinsic inducement
for them to try harder, or (3) offer feedback that will help them become more adept at, and excited about, what they’re doing. - 1 more annotations...
-
-
-
Now some observers criticize rubrics because they can never deliver the promised
precision; judgments ultimately turn on adjectives that are murky and end up
being left to the teacher’s discretion -
In boiling “a messy process down to 4-6 rows of nice, neat, organized little
boxes,” she argues, assessment is “stripped of the complexity that breathes life
into good writing.”
-
-
Victor Hugo Rojas B.“rubrics make assessing student work quick and efficient, and they help teachers to justify to parents and others the grades that they assign to students.” To which the only appropriate response is: Uh-oh.
-
-
Thus, the dilemma: Either
our instruction and our assessment remain “out of synch” or the instruction gets worse in order that students’ writing can be easily judged
with the help of rubrics.
-
-
-
For starters, I realized that it’s hardly sufficient to recommend a given approach on the basis of its being better than
old-fashioned report cards. By that criterion, just about anything would look good -
I eventually came to understand that not
all alternative assessments are authentic. - 16 more annotations...
-
-
Sarah HanawaldAlfie Kohn on why rubrics are dangerous. I think he's right, but I'm not sure what to do about it.
-
Ben WKohn describing why rubrics can hurt student learning.
-
Brad Ovenell-CarterAlfie Kohn
-
Once we check our judgment at the
door, we can all learn to give a 4 to exactly the same things. -
This attempt to deny the subjectivity of human judgment is objectionable in its own right.
- 7 more annotations...
-
-
Dennis Richardshttp://www.alfiekohn.org/teaching/rubrics.htm downloaded on 7.15.09
*...research shows three reliable effects when students are graded: They tend to think less deeply, avoid taking risks, and lose interest in the learning itself.
*Rubrics are, above all, a tool to promote standardization, to turn teachers into grading machines or at least allow them to pretend that what they’re doing is exact and objective.
*As long as the rubric is only one of several sources, as long as it doesn’t drive the instruction, it could conceivably play a constructive role.
*students whose attention is relentlessly focused on how well they’re doing often become less engaged with what they're doing.
*What all this means is that improving the design of rubrics, or inventing our own, won’t solve the problem because the problem is inherent to the very idea of rubrics and the goals they serve.
*Neither we nor our assessment strategies can be simultaneously devoted to helping all students improve and to sorting them into winners and losers.
*We have to reassess the whole enterprise of assessment, the goal being to make sure it’s consistent with the reason we decided to go into teaching in the first place. -
Patrick HigginsKohn makes some interesting points in this piece from 2006. This would be a great article for a discussion, or a diigo annotation session.
-
Ty YostTrouble with Rubrics
-
-
“gotcha” justification.
-
Studies have shown that too much attention to the quality of one’s performance
is associated with more superficial thinking, less interest in whatever one is doing, less perseverance in the face of failure, and a
tendency to attribute the outcome to innate ability and other factors thought to be beyond one’s control.[7] To that extent, more detailed
and frequent evaluations of a student’s accomplishments may be downright counterproductive.
-
-
Chris ChampionFrom @lthumann in response to a conversation at the NJEA conference with @dancallahan and @kjarrett
-
-
The fatal flaw in this logic is revealed by a line of
research in educational psychology showing that students whose attention is
relentlessly focused on how well they’re doing often become less engaged with
what they're doing.
-
-
-
But it’s
also harmful in a very practical sense.
In an important article published in 1999, Linda Mabry, now at
Washington State University, pointed out that rubrics “are designed to
function as scoring guidelines, but they also serve as arbiters of quality
and agents of control” over what is taught and valued. Because “agreement among scorers is more
easily achieved with regard to such matters as spelling and organization,” these
are the characteristics that will likely find favor in a rubricized classroom. Mabry cites research showing that
“compliance with the rubric tended to yield higher scores but produced ‘vacuous’
writing.”[3] -
This attempt to deny the subjectivity of human judgment is
objectionable in its own right. - 8 more annotations...
-
-
Kerry JohnsonAre rubrics a brave new world of assessment? Or are they merely a way for educators to justify the grades they give? And what effect do grades have on learning?
-
Gregory LouieThe Trouble with Rubrics
By Alfie Kohn
Once upon a time I vaguely thought of assessment in dichotomous terms: The old approach, which consisted mostly of letter grades, was crude and uninformative, while the new approach, which included things like portfolios and rubrics, was detailed and authentic. Only much later did I look more carefully at the individual floats rolling by in the alternative assessment parade -- and stop cheering. -
-
Studies have shown that too much attention
to the quality of one’s performance is associated with more superficial
thinking, less interest in whatever one is doing, less perseverance in the
face of failure, and a tendency to attribute the outcome to innate ability
and other factors thought to be beyond one’s control.
-
-
Ms. RowleyEssay written in 2006 by Alfie Kohn. Discusses the use of rubrics in schools, esp.writing class.
-
Cindy MarstonAlfie Kohn article about the problems with rubrics
-
Studies have shown that too much attention
to the quality of one’s performance is associated with more superficial
thinking, less interest in whatever one is doing, less perseverance in the
face of failure, and a tendency to attribute the outcome to innate ability
and other factors thought to be beyond one’s control.[7] -
Any form
of assessment that encourages students to keep asking, “How am I doing?” is
likely to change how they look at themselves and at what they’re learning,
usually for the worse. - 1 more annotations...
-
-
Ezra FRubrics are, above all, a tool to promote standardization, to turn teachers into grading machines or at least allow them to pretend that what they’re doing is exact and objective. Frankly, I’m amazed by the number of educators whose opposition to standardized tests and standardized curricula mysteriously fails to extend to standardized in-class assessments.
-
Michael WackerThe ultimate goal of authentic assessment must be the elimination of grades. But rubrics actually help to legitimate grades by offering a new way to derive them. They do nothing to address the terrible reality of students who have been led to focus on g
-
Tony Searlarticles by alfie kohn
-
-
So let’s shine a light over
there and ask: What’s our reason for trying to evaluate the
quality of students’ efforts? It matters
whether the objective is to (1) rank kids against one another, (2) provide an
extrinsic inducement for them to try harder, or (3) offer feedback that will
help them become more adept at, and excited about, what they’re doing. Devising more efficient rating techniques –
and imparting a scientific luster to those ratings – may make it even easier
to avoid asking this question. In any
case, it’s certainly not going to shift our rationale away from (1) or (2)
and toward (3).
-
-
Tania Shekothe trouble with grading rubrics - article by Alfie Kohn
-
Jeff UtechtWhat all this means is that improving the design of rubrics, or inventing our own, won’t solve the problem because the problem is inherent to the very idea of rubrics and the goals they serve.
-
Dean Shareskihe ultimate goal of authentic assessment must be the elimination of grades. But rubrics actually help to legitimate grades by offering a new way to derive them. They do nothing to address the terrible reality of students who have been led to focus on ge
Page Comments
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.