This link has been bookmarked by 214 people . It was first bookmarked on 01 Jun 2008, by Clay Burell.
-
02 Jan 15
-
From Degrading to De-Grading
By Alfie Kohn
-
-
27 Dec 14
-
22 Dec 14
-
Anyone who has heard the term “authentic assessment” knows that abolishing grades doesn’t mean eliminating the process of gathering information about student performance – and communicating that information to students and parents. Rather, abolishing grades opens up possibilities that are far more meaningful and constructive. These include narratives (written comments), portfolios (carefully chosen collections of students’ writings and projects that demonstrate their interests, achievement, and improvement over time), student-led parent-teacher conferences, exhibitions and other opportunities for students to show what they can do.
-
-
16 Dec 14
Dave MorganAlphie Kohn IMpact of grades and why they should be changed
-
-
Grades tend to reduce students’ interest in the learning itself. One of the most well-researched findings in the field of motivational psychology is that the more people are rewarded for doing something, the more they tend to lose interest in whatever they had to do to get the reward
-
students given numerical grades were significantly less creative than those who received qualitative feedback but no grades.
-
Grades waste a lot of time that could be spent on learning. Add up all the hours that teachers spend fussing with their grade books.
-
Grades encourage cheating
-
Grades spoil teachers’ relationships with students. Consider this lament, which could have been offered by a teacher in your district:
I’m getting tired of running a classroom in which everything we do revolves around grades. I’m tired of being suspicious when students give me compliments, wondering whether or not they are just trying to raise their grade. I’m tired of spending so much time and energy grading your papers, when there are probably a dozen more productive and enjoyable ways for all of us to handle the evaluation of papers. I’m tired of hearing you ask me ‘Does this count?’ And, heaven knows, I’m certainly tired of all those little arguments and disagreements we get into concerning marks which take so much fun out of the teaching and the learning. . . (Kirschenbaum et al., 1971, p. 115).
-
One might reply that “high schools have no responsibility to serve colleges by performing the sorting function for them” – particularly if that process undermines learning
-
traditional grades are not mandatory for admission to colleges and universities.
-
Another route to gradual change is to begin by eliminating only the most pernicious practices, such as grading on a curve or ranking students.
-
it’s harder for a teacher to do these kinds of assessments if he or she has 150 or more students and sees each of them for 45-55 minutes a day. But that’s not an argument for continuing to use traditional grades; it’s an argument for challenging these archaic remnants of a factory-oriented approach to instruction
-
Helping students forget about grades is the single best piece of advice for creating a learning-oriented classroom.
-
I could not
-
put a letter or number on anything they did during the term
-
I would, however, write a comment – or, better, sit down and talk with them – as often as possible to give them feedback.
-
An amazing thing happened: as the days went by, fewer and fewer students felt the need to ask me about grades. They began to be more involved with what we were learning because I had taken responsibility as a teacher to stop pushing grades into their faces
-
What I didn’t do very well, however, was to get students involved in devising the criteria for excellence (what makes a math solution elegant, an experiment well-designed, an essay persuasive, a story compelling) as well as deciding how well their projects met those criteria.
-
At the moment, plenty of admissions officers enjoy the convenience of class ranking, apparently because they have confused being better than one’s peers with being good at something; they’re looking for winners rather than learners.
-
A Letter for Colleges
We at ______________ High School believe our graduates are uniquely qualified to take advantage of what your institution of higher learning has to offer because they are interested in what they will be able to learn rather than in what grade they will be able to get. By the time they leave us, our students have grown into scholars, and that's due in large part to the absence of traditional ratings. Students in other schools spend much of their time and mental effort keeping track of their grade-point averages, figuring out what is required for an A and then doing only that and no more. At ___________, that time and energy are devoted exclusively to encountering great ideas and great literature, using the scientific method, thinking like an historian or a mathematician, and learning to speak and write with precision. Our students not only think clearly - they take joy in doing so . . . precisely because their efforts have not been reduced to letters or numbers.
The enclosed transcript includes a wealth of other information about the applicant - a descriptive list of the courses s/he has completed and the special projects and extracurricular activities s/he has undertaken, as well as what selected members of our staff have to say about the student as a thinker and as a person. We believe that these data, together with the personal essay you may request and the interview we hope you will conduct, will give you a rich and complete portrait of this applicant such that a list of grades would add little in any case.
-
-
15 Dec 14
-
19 Nov 14
-
16 Nov 14
-
12 Nov 14
-
10 Sep 14
-
25 Apr 14
-
17 Apr 14
-
Helping students forget about grades is the single best piece of advice for creating a learning-oriented classroom.
-
-
15 Mar 14
-
07 Mar 14
-
22 Feb 14
-
05 Feb 14
-
31 Jan 14
-
Another objection: it is sometimes argued that students must be given grades because colleges demand them. One might reply that “high schools have no responsibility to serve colleges by performing the sorting function for them” – particularly if that process undermines learning (Krumboltz and Yeh, 1996, p. 325). But in any case the premise of this argument is erroneous: traditional grades are not mandatory for admission to colleges and universities. (See Sidebar A.)
-
It is not widely known, for example, that at least 280 colleges and universities don’t require applicants to take either the SAT or the ACT. [By 2010, that number had grown to nearly 850, representing almost 40 percent of all accredited four-year institutions in the U.S.]
-
t I have heard of high schools approaching the admissions directors of nearby universities and saying, in effect, “We’d like to improve our school by getting rid of grades. Here’s why. Will you work with us to make sure our seniors aren’t penalized?” This strategy may well be successful for the simple reason that not many high schools are requesting this at present and the added inconvenience for admissions offices is likely to be negligible. Of course, if more and more high schools abandon traditional grades, then the universities will have no choice but to adapt. This is a change that high schools will have to initiate rather than waiting for colleges to signal their readiness.
-
Carolina Friends School, Durham, NC -- www.cfsnc.org
Eagle Rock School, Estes Park, CO -- www.eaglerockschool.org
Jefferson County Open School, Lakewood, CO -- http://bit.ly/2arSEL
Lehman Alternative Community School, Ithaca, NY -- www.icsd.k12.ny.us/legacy/acs/info.htm
Metropolitan Learning Center, Portland, OR -- www.mlc-k12.com
Poughkeepsie Day School, Poughkeepsie, NY -- www.poughkeepsieday.org
Saint Ann’s School, Brooklyn, NY -- www.saintanns.k12.ny.us
Waring School, Beverly, MA -- www.waringschool.org
-
-
24 Jan 14
-
11 Jan 14
-
17 Dec 13
-
16 Nov 13
-
13 Nov 13
-
05 Nov 13
-
-
Grades tend to reduce students’ interest in the learning itself.
-
Students of all ages who have been led to concentrate on getting a good grade are likely to pick the easiest possible assignment if given a choice
-
Grades distort the curriculum
-
-
15 Oct 13
-
Many teachers are loath to give up what is essentially an instrument of control.
-
suggests a willful refusal to examine one’s classroom practices and assumptions about teaching and learning
-
A friend of mine likes to say that people don’t resist change – they resist being changed.
-
The first step for an administrator, therefore, is to open up a conversation – to spend perhaps a full year just encouraging people to think and talk about the effects of (and alternatives to) traditional grades.
-
parental concerns
-
whether schools exist for the purpose of competitive credentialing or for the purpose of helping everyone to learn
-
the demonstrated harm of traditional grading on the quality of students’ learning and their interest in exploring ideas
-
-
06 Oct 13
David RamosThe more the task required creative thinking, in fact, the worse the performance of students who knew they were going to be graded
-
Frankly, we ought to be worried for these teachers’ students. In my experience, the most impressive teachers are those who despise the whole process of giving grades. Their aversion, as it turns out, is supported by solid evidence that raises questions about the very idea of traditional grading.
-
Grades tend to reduce students’ interest in the learning itself
-
While it’s not impossible for a student to be concerned about getting high marks and also to like what he or she is doing, the practical reality is that these two ways of thinking generally pull in opposite directions
-
study after study has found that students -- from elementary school to graduate school, and across cultures – demonstrate less interest in learning as a result of being graded
-
The more pressure to get an A, the less inclination to truly challenge oneself
-
they are adapting to an environment where good grades, not intellectual exploration, are what count
-
One series of studies, for example, found that students given numerical grades were significantly less creative than those who received qualitative feedback but no grades
-
The more the task required creative thinking, in fact, the worse the performance of students who knew they were going to be graded
-
Providing students with comments in addition to a grade didn’t help: the highest achievement occurred only when comments were given instead of numerical scores
-
In short, what grades offer is spurious precision – a subjective rating masquerading as an objective evaluation.
-
Researchers have found that the more students are led to focus on getting good grades, the more likely they are to cheat, even if they themselves regard cheating as wrong
-
I’m getting tired of running a classroom in which everything we do revolves around grades. I’m tired of being suspicious when students give me compliments, wondering whether or not they are just trying to raise their grade. I’m tired of spending so much time and energy grading your papers, when there are probably a dozen more productive and enjoyable ways for all of us to handle the evaluation of papers. I’m tired of hearing you ask me ‘Does this count?’ And, heaven knows, I’m certainly tired of all those little arguments and disagreements we get into concerning marks which take so much fun out of the teaching and the learning. . .
-
The quality of students’ thinking has been shown to depend partly on the extent to which they are permitted to learn cooperatively
-
Perhaps because of this training, grades can succeed in getting students to show up on time, hand in their work, and otherwise do what they’re told
-
when the curriculum is engaging – for example, when it involves hands-on, interactive learning activities -- students who aren’t graded at all perform just as well as those who are graded (Moeller and Reschke, 1993).
-
Anyone who has heard the term “authentic assessment” knows that abolishing grades doesn’t mean eliminating the process of gathering information about student performance – and communicating that information to students and parents
-
These include narratives (written comments), portfolios (carefully chosen collections of students’ writings and projects that demonstrate their interests, achievement, and improvement over time), student-led parent-teacher conferences, exhibitions
-
learning more about schools that have arranged things so each teacher can spend more time with fewer students (e.g., Meier, 1995).
-
The real problem is that almost all kids (including yours) will come to focus on grades and, as a result, their learning will be hurt.
-
The short answer is that they should do everything within their power to make grades as invisible as possible for as long as possible
-
-
23 Sep 13
-
erhaps because of this training, grades can succeed in getting students to show up on time, hand in their work, and otherwise do what they’re told. Many teachers are loath to give up what is essentially an instrument of control. But even to the extent this instrument works (which is not always), we are obliged to reflect on whether mindless compliance is really our goal. The teacher who exclaims, “These kids would blow off my course in a minute if they weren’t getting a grade for it!” may be issuing a powerful indictment of his or her course. Who would be more reluctant to give up grades than a teacher who spends the period slapping transparencies on the overhead projector and lecturing endlessly at students about Romantic poets or genetic codes? Without bribes (A’s) and threats (F’s), students would have no reason to do such assignments. To maintain that this proves something is wrong with the kids – or that grades are simply “necessary” – suggests a willful refusal to examine one’s classroom practices and assumptions about teaching and learning.
-
-
05 Sep 13
-
04 Jul 13
-
One of the most well-researched findings in the field of motivational psychology is that the more people are rewarded for doing something, the more they tend to lose interest in whatever they had to do to get the reward (Kohn, 1993).
-
-
28 Jun 13
-
24 Jun 13
-
19 Feb 13
-
15 Feb 13
-
30 Dec 12
-
28 Dec 12
-
14 Dec 12
-
04 Nov 12
-
09 Oct 12
-
the more they tend to lose interest in whatever they had to do to get the reward (Kohn, 1993)
-
“grade orientation” and a “learning orientation
-
A “B” in English says nothing about what a student can do, what she understands, where she needs help. Moreover, the basis for that grade is as subjective as the result is uninformative.
-
-
26 Sep 12
Terry WaggonerArticle on the effects of grading
assessment grading education grades AlfieKohn alfie kohn kohn motivation extrinsic intrinsic
-
One of the most well-researched findings in the field of motivational psychology is that the more people are rewarded for doing something, the more they tend to lose interest in whatever they had to do to get the reward (Kohn, 1993).
-
Grades tend to reduce students’ interest in the learning itself.
-
they are likely to come to view that task (or book or idea) as a chore.
-
Some research has explicitly demonstrated that a “grade orientation” and a “learning orientation” are inversely related (Beck et al., 1991; Milton et al., 1986)
-
Thus, anyone who wants to see students get hooked on words and numbers and ideas already has reason to look for other ways of assessing and describing their achievement.
-
tasks
-
Grades tend to reduce students’ preference for challenging
-
Grades tend to reduce the quality of students’ thinking.
-
the highest achievement occurred only when comments were given instead of numerical scores
-
Grades aren’t valid, reliable, or objective.
-
Grades distort the curriculum.
-
Grades waste a lot of time that could be spent on learning.
-
Grades encourage cheating.
-
Grades spoil teachers’ relationships with students.
-
Grades spoil students’ relationships with each other.
-
The most destructive form of grading by far is that which is done “on a curve,” such that the number of top grades is artificially limited: no matter how well all the students do, not all of them can get an A.
-
(Wise educators realize that it doesn’t matter how motivated students are; what matters is how students are motivated. It is the type of motivation that counts, not the amount.
-
oo many students have accepted that getting A’s is the point of going to school.
-
“If I can’t give a child a better reason for studying than a grade on a report card, I ought to lock my desk and go home and stay there.” So wrote Dorothy De Zouche, a Missouri teacher, in an article published in February . . . of 1945.
-
bolishing grades doesn’t mean eliminating the process of gathering information about student performance
-
and communicating that information to students and parents.
-
block scheduling, team teaching, interdisciplinary courses – and learning more about schools that have arranged things so each teacher can spend more time with fewer students
-
-
16 Aug 12
-
15 Aug 12
-
14 Aug 12
-
-
Grade Inflation . . . and Other Distractions
-
-
13 Aug 12
-
-
You can tell a lot about a teacher’s values and personality just by asking how he or she feels about giving grades
-
In my experience, the most impressive teachers are those who despise the whole process of giving grades.
-
Grades tend to reduce students’ interest in the learning itself.
-
Some research has explicitly demonstrated that a “grade orientation” and a “learning orientation” are inversely related (Beck et al., 1991; Milton et al., 1986).
-
Grades tend to reduce students’ preference for challenging tasks.
-
Grades tend to reduce the quality of students’ thinking.
-
One series of studies, for example, found that students given numerical grades were significantly less creative than those who received qualitative feedback but no grades.
-
Grades aren’t valid, reliable, or objective.
-
any given assignment may well be given two different grades by two equally qualified teachers.
-
Grades distort the curriculum.
-
Grades waste a lot of time that could be spent on learning.
-
Grades encourage cheating.
-
Grades spoil teachers’ relationships with students.
-
Grades spoil students’ relationships with each other.
-
The competition that turns schooling into a quest for triumph and ruptures relationships among students doesn’t just happen within classrooms, of course. The same effect is witnessed at a schoolwide level when kids are not just rated but ranked, sending the message that the point isn’t to learn, or even to perform well, but to defeat others.
-
It is also striking how many educators never get beyond relatively insignificant questions, such as how many tests to give, or how often to send home grade reports, or what grade should be given for a specified level of achievement (e.g., what constitutes “B” work), or what number corresponds to what letter.
-
Let’s consider the most frequently heard responses to the above arguments – which is to say, the most common objections to getting rid of grades.
-
First, it is said that students expect to receive grades and even seem addicted to them. This is often true;
-
Perhaps because of this training, grades can succeed in getting students to show up on time, hand in their work, and otherwise do what they’re told.
-
Another objection: it is sometimes argued that students must be given grades because colleges demand them. One might reply that “high schools have no responsibility to serve colleges by performing the sorting function for them”
-
people don’t resist change – they resist being changed.
-
The actual process of “de-grading” can be done in stages.
-
eliminating only the most pernicious practices, such as grading on a curve or ranking students
-
I knew that my refusal to rate their learning might only cause some students to worry about their marks all the more, or to create suspense about what would appear on their final grade reports, which of course would defeat the whole purpose. So I said that anyone who absolutely had to know what grade a given paper would get could come see me and we would figure it out together.
-
But I have seen teachers who were more willing to give up control, more committed to helping students participate in assessment and turn that into part of the learning.
-
-
12 Jul 12
-
22 Jun 12
Amy MA controversial view on not using grades.
-
17 Jun 12
-
04 Jun 12
-
22 May 12
-
12 Apr 12
-
You can tell a lot about a teacher’s values and personality just by asking how he or she feels about giving grades. Some defend the practice, claiming that grades are necessary to “motivate” students.
-
the most impressive teachers are those who despise the whole process of giving grades. Their aversion, as it turns out, is supported by solid evidence that raises questions about the very idea of traditional grading.
-
1. Grades tend to reduce students’ interest in the learning itself
-
they are likely to come to view that task (or book or idea) as a chore.
-
these two ways of thinking generally pull in opposite directions
-
2. Grades tend to reduce students’ preference for challenging tasks
-
Students of all ages who have been led to concentrate on getting a good grade are likely to pick the easiest possible assignment if given a choice
-
The more pressure to get an A, the less inclination to truly challenge oneself.
-
3. Grades tend to reduce the quality of students’ thinking.
-
students who tended to think about current events in terms of what they’d need to know for a grade were less knowledgeable than their peers
-
4. Grades aren’t valid, reliable, or objective.
-
what grades offer is spurious precision – a subjective rating masquerading as an objective evaluation
-
5. Grades distort the curriculum.
-
6. Grades waste a lot of time that could be spent on learning
-
7. Grades encourage cheating
-
9. Grades spoil students’ relationships with each other.
-
"It is not a symbol of rigor to have grades fall into a 'normal' distribution; rather, it is a symbol of failure -- failure to teach well, failure to test well, and failure to have any influence at all on the intellectual lives of students” (Milton et al., 1986, p. 225).
-
The competition that turns schooling into a quest for triumph and ruptures relationships among students doesn’t just happen within classrooms, of course.
-
I’ve taught high school students who reacted to the absence of grades with what I can only describe as existential vertigo.
-
high schools point the finger at colleges
-
It’s more an indictment of what has happened to them in the past than an argument to keep doing it in the future
-
Many teachers are loath to give up what is essentially an instrument of control. But even to the extent this instrument works (which is not always), we are obliged to reflect on whether mindless compliance is really our goal.
-
bribes (A’s) and threats (F’s)
-
“If I can’t give a child a better reason for studying than a grade on a report card, I ought to lock my desk and go home and stay there.” So wrote Dorothy De Zouche, a Missouri teacher, in an article published in February . . . of 1945.
-
traditional grades are not mandatory for admission to colleges and universities.
-
people don’t resist change – they resist being changed.
-
The first step for an administrator, therefore, is to open up a conversation – to spend perhaps a full year just encouraging people to think and talk about the effects of (and alternatives to) traditional grades.
-
Anyone who has heard the term “authentic assessment” knows that abolishing grades doesn’t mean eliminating the process of gathering information about student performance – and communicating that information to students and parents
-
portfolios
-
narratives
-
projects
-
conferences
-
exhibitions
-
it’s harder for a teacher to do these kinds of assessments if he or she has 150 or more students and sees each of them for 45-55 minutes a day. But that’s not an argument for continuing to use traditional grades; it’s an argument for challenging these archaic remnants of a factory-oriented approach to instruction,
-
It’s an argument for looking into block scheduling, team teaching, interdisciplinary courses
-
whether schools exist for the purpose of competitive credentialing or for the purpose of helping everyone to learn
-
traditional grading undermines excellence
-
they should do everything within their power to make grades as invisible as possible for as long as possible.
-
Helping students forget about grades is the single best piece of advice for creating a learning-oriented classroom.
-
as the days went by, fewer and fewer students felt the need to ask me about grades
-
get students involved in devising the criteria for excellence (what makes a math solution elegant, an experiment well-designed, an essay persuasive, a story compelling) as well as deciding how well their projects met those criteria.
-
give up control
-
helping students participate in assessment and turn that into part of the learning
-
powerful alternatives to letter grades
-
plenty of admissions officers enjoy the convenience of class ranking, apparently because they have confused being better than one’s peers with being good at something; they’re looking for winners rather than learners.
-
-
19 Mar 12
-
17 Mar 12
Brian C. Smith#ceesa2012 The grade might be useful to the teacher but it's destructive for developing learner capacity: Alfie Kohn: http://t.co/8aDIZwq9
-
04 Mar 12
-
22 Feb 12
-
17 Feb 12
-
1. Grades tend to reduce students’ interest in the learning itself.
-
2. Grades tend to reduce students’ preference for challenging tasks.
-
3. Grades tend to reduce the quality of students’ thinking.
-
4. Grades aren’t valid, reliable, or objective.
-
5. Grades distort the curriculum.
-
6. Grades waste a lot of time that could be spent on learning.
-
. Grades encourage cheating.
-
8. Grades spoil teachers’ relationships with students.
-
9. Grades spoil students’ relationships with each other.
-
-
18 Jan 12
-
16 Jan 12
-
16 Dec 11
David WilliamsThis is pretty interesting. I want our school to get away from grades, but I have questions about how we then demonstrate their capabilities to colleges? Also, valedictorians get free rides to in-state institutions. So, how does that work?
-
13 Dec 11
-
Three Main Effects of Grading
-
1. Grades tend to reduce students’ interest in the learning itself.
-
ome research has explicitly demonstrated that a “grade orientation” and a “learning orientation” are inversely related (Beck et al., 1991; Milton et al., 1986).
-
less interest in learning as a result of being graded (Benware and Deci, 1984; Butler, 1987; Butler and Nisan, 1986; Grolnick and Ryan, 1987; Harter and Guzman, 1986; Hughes et al., 1985; Kage, 1991; Salili et al., 1976).
-
Grades tend to reduce students’ preference for challenging tasks.
-
easiest possible assignment if given a choice (Harter, 1978; Harter and Guzman, 1986; Kage, 1991; Milton et al., 1986).
-
Grades tend to reduce the quality of students’ thinking.
-
the highest achievement occurred only when comments were given instead of numerical scores
-
A brand-new study discovered that students who tended to think about current events in terms of what they’d need to know for a grade were less knowledgeable than their peers, even after taking other variables into account (Anderman and Johnston, 1998).
-
More Reasons to Just Say No to Grades
-
Grades aren’t valid, reliable, or objective.
-
Grades distort the curriculum.
-
Grades waste a lot of time that could be spent on learning.
-
Grades encourage cheating.
-
Grades spoil teachers’ relationships with students.
-
Grades spoil students’ relationships with each other
-
Grade Inflation . . . and Other Distractions
-
yet we continue to reduce students to letters or numbers on a regular basis.
-
Oddly, when educators are shown that it doesn’t have to be this way, some react with suspicion instead of relief. They want to know why you’re making trouble, or they assert that you’re exaggerating the negative effects of grades (it’s really not so bad – cough, cough), or they dismiss proven alternatives to grading on the grounds that our school could never do what others schools have done.
-
The proper occasion for outrage is not that too many students are getting A’s, but that too many students have accepted that getting A’s is the point of going to school.
-
A friend of mine likes to say that people don’t resist change – they resist being changed.
-
Although grades, per se, may continue for a while, at least the message will be sent from the beginning that all students can do well, and that the point is to succeed rather than to beat others.
-
Anyone who has heard the term “authentic assessment” knows that abolishing grades doesn’t mean eliminating the process of gathering information about student performance – and communicating that information to students and parents. Rather, abolishing grades opens up possibilities that are far more meaningful and constructive. These include narratives (written comments), portfolios (carefully chosen collections of students’ writings and projects that demonstrate their interests, achievement, and improvement over time), student-led parent-teacher conferences, exhibitions and other opportunities for students to show what they can do.
-
Of course, it’s harder for a teacher to do these kinds of assessments if he or she has 150 or more students and sees each of them for 45-55 minutes a day. But that’s not an argument for continuing to use traditional grades; it’s an argument for challenging these archaic remnants of a factory-oriented approach to instruction, structural aspects of high schools that are bad news for reasons that go well beyond the issue of assessment. It’s an argument for looking into block scheduling, team teaching, interdisciplinary courses – and learning more about schools that have arranged things so each teacher can spend more time with fewer students (e.g., Meier, 1995).
-
Above all, we need to make sure that objections and concerns about the details don’t obscure the main message, which is the demonstrated harm of traditional grading on the quality of students’ learning and their interest in exploring ideas.
-
-
21 Nov 11
-
31 Oct 11
-
06 Oct 11
-
30 Aug 11
-
18 Jul 11
Chris KervinaAlfie Kohn on grading purpose: are grades "competitive credentialing" or are grades learning centered? http://dft.ba/-grd
-
16 Jul 11
-
08 Jul 11
Alison HarperAlfie Kohn's take on grading is worth the read-- make you really evaluate your own beliefs http://t.co/taZk79C
-
07 Jul 11
-
13 May 11
Henning FjørtoftLeser igjen: Et kritisk blikk på karakterbasert vurdering http://bit.ly/2vq4a3 God artikkel!
-
07 May 11
-
14 Apr 11
-
1. Grades tend to reduce students’ interest in the learning itself.
-
2. Grades tend to reduce students’ preference for challenging tasks.
-
3. Grades tend to reduce the quality of students’ thinking.
-
4. Grades aren’t valid, reliable, or objective.
-
5. Grades distort the curriculum
-
6. Grades waste a lot of time that could be spent on learning.
-
7. Grades encourage cheating
-
8. Grades spoil teachers’ relationships with students
-
9. Grades spoil students’ relationships with each other.
-
Grade Inflation . . . and Other Distractions
-
Anyone who has heard the term “authentic assessment” knows that abolishing grades doesn’t mean eliminating the process of gathering information about student performance – and communicating that information to students and parents. Rather, abolishing grades opens up possibilities that are far more meaningful and constructive. These include narratives (written comments), portfolios (carefully chosen collections of students’ writings and projects that demonstrate their interests, achievement, and improvement over time), student-led parent-teacher conferences, exhibitions and other opportunities for students to show what they can do.
-
-
03 Apr 11
-
students who cut corners may not be lazy so much as rational; they are adapting to an environment where good grades, not intellectual exploration, are what count.
-
the highest achievement occurred only when comments were given instead of numerical scores
-
Even the score on a math test is largely a reflection of how the test was written: what skills the teacher decided to assess, what kinds of questions happened to be left out, and how many points each section was “worth.”
-
Researchers have found that the more students are led to focus on getting good grades, the more likely they are to cheat, even if they themselves regard cheating as wrong
-
I’m getting tired of running a classroom in which everything we do revolves around grades. I’m tired of being suspicious when students give me compliments, wondering whether or not they are just trying to raise their grade. I’m tired of spending so much time and energy grading your papers, when there are probably a dozen more productive and enjoyable ways for all of us to handle the evaluation of papers. I’m tired of hearing you ask me ‘Does this count?’ And, heaven knows, I’m certainly tired of all those little arguments and disagreements we get into concerning marks which take so much fun out of the teaching and the learning
-
its practical effect is to teach students that others are potential obstacles to their own success
-
sending the message that the point isn’t to learn, or even to perform well, but to defeat others.
-
reduce students to letters or numbers
-
Some even reserve their outrage for the possibility that too many students are ending up with good grades, a reaction that suggests stinginess with A’s is being confused with intellectual rigor.
-
too many students have accepted that getting A’s is the point of going to school.
-
Perhaps because of this training, grades can succeed in getting students to show up on time, hand in their work, and otherwise do what they’re told.
-
Many teachers are loath to give up what is essentially an instrument of control.
-
The teacher who exclaims, “These kids would blow off my course in a minute if they weren’t getting a grade for it!” may be issuing a powerful indictment of his or her course.
-
teachers who can give a child a better reason for studying don’t need grades
-
when the curriculum is engaging – for example, when it involves hands-on, interactive learning activities -- students who aren’t graded at all perform just as well as those who are graded
-
Another route to gradual change is to begin by eliminating only the most pernicious practices, such as grading on a curve or ranking students.
-
the point is to succeed rather than to beat others.
-
abolishing grades doesn’t mean eliminating the process of gathering information about student performance
-
narratives (written comments), portfolios (carefully chosen collections of students’ writings and projects that demonstrate their interests, achievement, and improvement over time), student-led parent-teacher conferences, exhibitions and other opportunities for students to show what they can do.
-
challenging these archaic remnants of a factory-oriented approach to instruction
-
spare the self-esteem of students who do poorly
-
I knew that my refusal to rate their learning might only cause some students to worry about their marks all the more, or to create suspense about what would appear on their final grade reports, which of course would defeat the whole purpose.
-
They began to be more involved with what we were learning because I had taken responsibility as a teacher to stop pushing grades into their faces, so to speak, whenever they completed an assignment.
-
-
09 Mar 11
-
08 Mar 11
-
20 Feb 11
-
16 Feb 11
-
11 Feb 11
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.