Leslie Raffelson on 2009-11-10
I would love to see people add notes to each piece on how they use this in their classes/lessons.
This link has been bookmarked by 316 people and liked by 2 people. It was first bookmarked on 15 May 2009, by Adalia Davis.
How Blooms fits in with technology web 2.0 tools
To use Bloom's taxonomy for 21st Century skills.
e digital additions and their explanations are as follows:
Understanding
The digital additions and their explanations are as follows:
Bloom's taxonomy as it relates to 21st century technology skills
Explanation of Bloom's Taxonomy revised for "digital additions and their justifications" - remembering, understanding, applying, analysing, evaluating, creating
Great article!
from Educators' eZine --> Introduction and Background:Bloom's TaxonomyIn the 1950's Benjamin Bloom developed his taxonomy of cognitive objectives, Bloom's
las categorias de bloom aplicadas a la enseñanza a distancia.
In the 1950's Benjamin Bloom developed his taxonomy of cognitive objectives, Bloom's Taxonomy. This categorized and ordered thinking skills and objectives. His taxonomy follows the thinking process. You can not understand a concept if you do not first rem
Set of Bloom's Taxonomy with digital spin.
21st century skills blooms taxonomy
"Bloom's Taxonomy
Blooms Digitally"
Leslie Raffelson on 2009-11-10
I would love to see people add notes to each piece on how they use this in their classes/lessons.
applying the cognitive thinking skills of Blooms Taxonomy to web2 actions
Bloom's Taxonomy Blooms Digitally
Bloom's Taxonomy is shown in some very nice diagrams. This form of Bloom's taxonomy gives verbs for each of the levels of thinking along with some technological verybs as well. There is a very useful graphic organizer of the levels of thinking connected to the verbs that should be used to describe the desired action.
In the 1950's Benjamin Bloom developed his taxonomy of cognitive objectives, Bloom's Taxonomy. This categorized and ordered thinking skills and objectives. His taxonomy follows the thinking process. You can not understand a concept if you do not first remember it, similarly you can not apply knowledge and concepts if you do not understand them. It is a continuum from Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) to Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Bloom labels each category with a gerund.
This site compares Bloom's original taxonomy with a new revised one. The levels are now verbs rather than gerunds and each level has digital examples.
Revision of Bloom's taxonomy
Churches, A. 2007, Educational Origami, Bloom's and ICT Tools
Anderson, L.W., and D. Krathwohl (Eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York.
Bloom's digital taxonomy map

Nice article about Bloom's - good list of skills associated at each level, as well
A useful description of Bloom's Taxonomy-- both the original and updated versions. Includes descriptions of technological skills that demonstrate competency at different levels.
bloom's taxonomy : order of cognitive thought utilized in a technology aspect
from Educators' eZine --> Introduction and Background:Bloom's TaxonomyIn the 1950's Benjamin Bloom developed his taxonomy of cognitive objectives, Bloom's
from Educators' eZine --> Introduction and Background:Bloom's TaxonomyIn the 1950's Benjamin Bloom developed his taxonomy of cognitive objectives, Bloom's
Bloom's Taxonomy - good graphic representation.
from Educators' eZine --> Introduction and Background:Bloom's TaxonomyIn the 1950's Benjamin Bloom developed his taxonomy of cognitive objectives, Bloom's
Blooms taxonomy of thinking skills, applied to digital information and communication technologies
Shows old and new with explanation
Digital elements & verbs are added to Bloom's Taxonomy
Andrew Church's analysis of Bloom's Digital taxonomy
Public Stiky Notes
1) First, Anderson and Krathwohl expressly designed the revised taxonomy to facilitate use by teachers or educators by using verbs, not gerunds (i.e., verbs ending with "ing").
2) Second, there is another layer to Anderson and Krathwohl's model: actually 3 more layers. For each of the remember to create levels, educators and designers can consider whether the work they are doing refers to a) factual knowledge, b) conceptual knowledge, c) procedural knowledge, or d) meta-cognitive knowledge.
Both of these elements of the their model are not presented here and are worth reading more about. Look for the original book: "A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing - A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives" by Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl, copyright 2001, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Page Comments
Would you like to comment?
Join Diigo for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.